with a comfortable under pick in nawlins-milwaukee game, i am 20-4 with my PODs.
Today's pick:
CHARLOTTE-MINNESOTA UNDER 193
Defensive and slow tempo Charlotte team coming off a tough loss against Houston traveling to Minnesota team who has been having trouble scoring against good defensive teams and battling injuries. First game went to 190pts but i dont think this one will be that close since both teams are b2b and al jefferson is out for minny while randy foye is questionable. Both teams are also in bottom 10 in shooting and offensive efficiency.
BONUS PICK:NAWLINS-CHICAGO UNDER TBD
Nawlins is a defensive half court team while expect Chicago to rely on their half court offense since they lost many of their wing players via trade or injury. Only game in this matchup went up to 200 points but you wanna remember Chicago shot unreal 56% in that game and Peja, Nocioni and Deng which combined to score 50 points in that game, won't be availabe today. Salmons will make up some of that but it won't be enough. Also, both teams are coming off tough games from last night. Line isn't out yet but if it is in 196-197 range or more, pound it.
Best of Luck.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
with a comfortable under pick in nawlins-milwaukee game, i am 20-4 with my PODs.
Today's pick:
CHARLOTTE-MINNESOTA UNDER 193
Defensive and slow tempo Charlotte team coming off a tough loss against Houston traveling to Minnesota team who has been having trouble scoring against good defensive teams and battling injuries. First game went to 190pts but i dont think this one will be that close since both teams are b2b and al jefferson is out for minny while randy foye is questionable. Both teams are also in bottom 10 in shooting and offensive efficiency.
BONUS PICK:NAWLINS-CHICAGO UNDER TBD
Nawlins is a defensive half court team while expect Chicago to rely on their half court offense since they lost many of their wing players via trade or injury. Only game in this matchup went up to 200 points but you wanna remember Chicago shot unreal 56% in that game and Peja, Nocioni and Deng which combined to score 50 points in that game, won't be availabe today. Salmons will make up some of that but it won't be enough. Also, both teams are coming off tough games from last night. Line isn't out yet but if it is in 196-197 range or more, pound it.
i like the cha-min under, but can't pull the trigger, i dunno why
you are probably thinking even a mediocre offense like charlotte's should be able to smash bad minny defense. i would share the same belief if they this wasn't an away game for charlotte and they weren't playing yesterday. i just don't see enough firepower from charlotte to push this over.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lts41:
i like the cha-min under, but can't pull the trigger, i dunno why
you are probably thinking even a mediocre offense like charlotte's should be able to smash bad minny defense. i would share the same belief if they this wasn't an away game for charlotte and they weren't playing yesterday. i just don't see enough firepower from charlotte to push this over.
Really nice record man , Looks like you know your stuff. Haven't seen your posts before but you got my attention now. Hope you continue your winning ways.
0
Really nice record man , Looks like you know your stuff. Haven't seen your posts before but you got my attention now. Hope you continue your winning ways.
Axp, Turc, do you think there's still any value at 191?
Jlipp, IMHO..that number is approaching very minimum/no value. Most of the time, it won't come into play but as bad as these two teams are offensively, i question the MIN defense at home. Turc may be right on when he said this isn't going to come close to 190 but you know I have that 3 possession cushion rule. I didn't get in @193 and I can't buy @191. GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by jlippens:
Axp, Turc, do you think there's still any value at 191?
Jlipp, IMHO..that number is approaching very minimum/no value. Most of the time, it won't come into play but as bad as these two teams are offensively, i question the MIN defense at home. Turc may be right on when he said this isn't going to come close to 190 but you know I have that 3 possession cushion rule. I didn't get in @193 and I can't buy @191. GL
Jlipp, IMHO..that number is approaching very minimum/no value. Most of the time, it won't come into play but as bad as these two teams are offensively, i question the MIN defense at home. Turc may be right on when he said this isn't going to come close to 190 but you know I have that 3 possession cushion rule. I didn't get in @193 and I can't buy @191. GL
I almost prefer this answer more than the reverse. Thanks for the word.
0
Quote Originally Posted by axpiota59:
Jlipp, IMHO..that number is approaching very minimum/no value. Most of the time, it won't come into play but as bad as these two teams are offensively, i question the MIN defense at home. Turc may be right on when he said this isn't going to come close to 190 but you know I have that 3 possession cushion rule. I didn't get in @193 and I can't buy @191. GL
I almost prefer this answer more than the reverse. Thanks for the word.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.