1. SD's game plan was complete trash....they tried to establish the run. LOL. Never threw on first down.
2. MN blitzed the piss out of SD. More then I've seen all year.
3. SD had a bunch of injuries on defense. Peterson is great, but SD was short handed.
That said, Favre and their offense 1. Isn't idiotic enough to think they need to run on first down, 2. Can get the ball out early enough to avoid what Rivers had happen to him, and 3. Their defense is plenty solid.
MN might get a few points....Peterson might go over 100. But MN will not stop GB like they did SD. GB is a completely different animal on offense (their offense strengths are exactly what MN doesn't do well on defense). MN will take a bend but not break approach....unlike last week. And oh, yeah, N. Turner doesn't coach the Packers.
Everyone jumping on MN off of that awesome performance by Peterson last week. I say caveat emptor.
0
1. SD's game plan was complete trash....they tried to establish the run. LOL. Never threw on first down.
2. MN blitzed the piss out of SD. More then I've seen all year.
3. SD had a bunch of injuries on defense. Peterson is great, but SD was short handed.
That said, Favre and their offense 1. Isn't idiotic enough to think they need to run on first down, 2. Can get the ball out early enough to avoid what Rivers had happen to him, and 3. Their defense is plenty solid.
MN might get a few points....Peterson might go over 100. But MN will not stop GB like they did SD. GB is a completely different animal on offense (their offense strengths are exactly what MN doesn't do well on defense). MN will take a bend but not break approach....unlike last week. And oh, yeah, N. Turner doesn't coach the Packers.
Everyone jumping on MN off of that awesome performance by Peterson last week. I say caveat emptor.
1. SD's game plan was complete trash....they tried to establish the run. LOL. Never threw on first down.
2. MN blitzed the piss out of SD. More then I've seen all year.
3. SD had a bunch of injuries on defense. Peterson is great, but SD was short handed.
That said, Favre and their offense 1. Isn't idiotic enough to think they need to run on first down, 2. Can get the ball out early enough to avoid what Rivers had happen to him, and 3. Their defense is plenty solid.
MN might get a few points....Peterson might go over 100. But MN will not stop GB like they did SD. GB is a completely different animal on offense (their offense strengths are exactly what MN doesn't do well on defense). MN will take a bend but not break approach....unlike last week. And oh, yeah, N. Turner doesn't coach the Packers.
Everyone jumping on MN off of that awesome performance by Peterson last week. I say caveat emptor.
0
1. SD's game plan was complete trash....they tried to establish the run. LOL. Never threw on first down.
2. MN blitzed the piss out of SD. More then I've seen all year.
3. SD had a bunch of injuries on defense. Peterson is great, but SD was short handed.
That said, Favre and their offense 1. Isn't idiotic enough to think they need to run on first down, 2. Can get the ball out early enough to avoid what Rivers had happen to him, and 3. Their defense is plenty solid.
MN might get a few points....Peterson might go over 100. But MN will not stop GB like they did SD. GB is a completely different animal on offense (their offense strengths are exactly what MN doesn't do well on defense). MN will take a bend but not break approach....unlike last week. And oh, yeah, N. Turner doesn't coach the Packers.
Everyone jumping on MN off of that awesome performance by Peterson last week. I say caveat emptor.
Would like to add--Minnesota is vulnerable to good passer's(Favre, Bono, McNair, Kitna). Play well against the team's with mediocre qb's(River's, whoever is qb for Chicago, and Harrington). Now this doesn't really mean much I guess, but I would have to say the it's a trend.
All said they've played once against each other, would lean to the Green Bay money line for a play in this one!!
0
Would like to add--Minnesota is vulnerable to good passer's(Favre, Bono, McNair, Kitna). Play well against the team's with mediocre qb's(River's, whoever is qb for Chicago, and Harrington). Now this doesn't really mean much I guess, but I would have to say the it's a trend.
All said they've played once against each other, would lean to the Green Bay money line for a play in this one!!
Adrian Peterson going for 300 yards against the Chargers is a real shocker.
Not sure what's gonna happen with him this week.
The Packers have "contained' some very good backs this year so I tend to think that Peterson won't have a big day on the Packers but after what he did to San Diego, I'm not sure about it.
And Minny has a very good O-Line.
0
Really don't know what to think about this game.
Adrian Peterson going for 300 yards against the Chargers is a real shocker.
Not sure what's gonna happen with him this week.
The Packers have "contained' some very good backs this year so I tend to think that Peterson won't have a big day on the Packers but after what he did to San Diego, I'm not sure about it.
GB has just killed me; I promised myself, my wife, my son, and my black lab......... No more betting on games that involve GB........ anyone ever have a similiar experience with any team???
when i bet with them i lose, when i bet against them i lose..... the only way for me to win........ bet some other games
0
GB has just killed me; I promised myself, my wife, my son, and my black lab......... No more betting on games that involve GB........ anyone ever have a similiar experience with any team???
when i bet with them i lose, when i bet against them i lose..... the only way for me to win........ bet some other games
GB has just killed me; I promised myself, my wife, my son, and my black lab......... No more betting on games that involve GB........ anyone ever have a similiar experience with any team???
when i bet with them i lose, when i bet against them i lose..... the only way for me to win........ bet some other games
Bengals keep screwing me over only time I won was the pittsburgh game- other than that they are out of my "locks" of the week lol
0
Quote Originally Posted by AtlFader:
GB has just killed me; I promised myself, my wife, my son, and my black lab......... No more betting on games that involve GB........ anyone ever have a similiar experience with any team???
when i bet with them i lose, when i bet against them i lose..... the only way for me to win........ bet some other games
Bengals keep screwing me over only time I won was the pittsburgh game- other than that they are out of my "locks" of the week lol
I still think this could be a let down game for Minn. coming off the big, relatively easy win at home. I think going on the road, playing at Lambeau this time is a big advantage for the Pack.
Peterson is mortal! He's had ho-hum weeks this year that nobody notices. They lost at home to Philly. Is Philly better than G.B.? Even equal? G.B. beat Minn. in their own house. AP had 112 but that's it. I expect Favre to have a big day and the Minn run game won't be able to be utilized for the full game. G.B. D is playing well lately. I love them at home in this one and the falling line.
GB -5.5
0
I still think this could be a let down game for Minn. coming off the big, relatively easy win at home. I think going on the road, playing at Lambeau this time is a big advantage for the Pack.
Peterson is mortal! He's had ho-hum weeks this year that nobody notices. They lost at home to Philly. Is Philly better than G.B.? Even equal? G.B. beat Minn. in their own house. AP had 112 but that's it. I expect Favre to have a big day and the Minn run game won't be able to be utilized for the full game. G.B. D is playing well lately. I love them at home in this one and the falling line.
My system, 17-4 in the last 3 weeks, wont let me pick gb -6. Its close but not totally there. 2 systems have gb winning by 9 but the other by just 3. The ML is highly probable. I can't totally endorse gb -6 but its not a terrible wager either.
0
My system, 17-4 in the last 3 weeks, wont let me pick gb -6. Its close but not totally there. 2 systems have gb winning by 9 but the other by just 3. The ML is highly probable. I can't totally endorse gb -6 but its not a terrible wager either.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
