only other notable injury is hauschka and they signed longwell who was last with the vikes and they signed a DE/LB who has been out of FB since 08 to be irvin's backup.
only other notable injury is hauschka and they signed longwell who was last with the vikes and they signed a DE/LB who has been out of FB since 08 to be irvin's backup.
But I wouldn't read too much into the ATL line move this early in the week. You will find action on both sides, ESPECIALLY if the line goes to SEA+3. I always get worried about lines that are -2... Inviting you to take the home fave laying only a field goal! It almost seems too good to be true... I think Sea's corners, plus their better run game make this a loooong game for Atlanta
But I wouldn't read too much into the ATL line move this early in the week. You will find action on both sides, ESPECIALLY if the line goes to SEA+3. I always get worried about lines that are -2... Inviting you to take the home fave laying only a field goal! It almost seems too good to be true... I think Sea's corners, plus their better run game make this a loooong game for Atlanta
You do realize you can pass Gavinnick? These lines are so tight there is no value on these games right now. Why not wait to see if there is a 2nd half line you have an edge on. Why do you have to bet the playoffs? There are a ton of games in hoops this weekend that are much better to play.
One book that I respect has dropped the GB game to 2.5 which is the most significant thing I have seen as far as line moves. The Seattle game will never see 3 at a reputable book.
You do realize you can pass Gavinnick? These lines are so tight there is no value on these games right now. Why not wait to see if there is a 2nd half line you have an edge on. Why do you have to bet the playoffs? There are a ton of games in hoops this weekend that are much better to play.
One book that I respect has dropped the GB game to 2.5 which is the most significant thing I have seen as far as line moves. The Seattle game will never see 3 at a reputable book.
Similar to Wash. Versus Seattle I figured the sharps were moving that line and it was
This could be a fake move but now it appears to be gaining steam,
Will be watching closely here
let me ask you something...
if a high-profile game posts a line, and someone makes a LIMIT-sized bet within the first 10 seconds of it being posted... do you qualify that as SHARP or SQUARE money?
i will answer it: that is SHARP money... SQUARE money doesn't cap the game before the line is posted, so that it knows exactly what line it wants to see to make a bet within 10 seconds of the line being posted...
here's my point: this game was posted with a line of ATL (-3)... and within seconds, it had moved to ATL (-2), or even lower at some places...
why is it that NOW (in the middle of the week) that the line is moving BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL OPENING LINE, do you assume this is SHARP money?
fact is, Clemons was ruled out, and Clemons is important enough to move this line a point... and it did... there is zero evidence (if that much) to suggest that today's line move is a SHARP hammer play...
Similar to Wash. Versus Seattle I figured the sharps were moving that line and it was
This could be a fake move but now it appears to be gaining steam,
Will be watching closely here
let me ask you something...
if a high-profile game posts a line, and someone makes a LIMIT-sized bet within the first 10 seconds of it being posted... do you qualify that as SHARP or SQUARE money?
i will answer it: that is SHARP money... SQUARE money doesn't cap the game before the line is posted, so that it knows exactly what line it wants to see to make a bet within 10 seconds of the line being posted...
here's my point: this game was posted with a line of ATL (-3)... and within seconds, it had moved to ATL (-2), or even lower at some places...
why is it that NOW (in the middle of the week) that the line is moving BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL OPENING LINE, do you assume this is SHARP money?
fact is, Clemons was ruled out, and Clemons is important enough to move this line a point... and it did... there is zero evidence (if that much) to suggest that today's line move is a SHARP hammer play...
you wanna talk about being sharp... consider this: i was at a Vegas sportsbook yesterday, observing the futures odds... the odds on Seattle winning the Super Bowl were (+500)... odds on Atlanta wiinning the SB were (+550)...
so, the line on this game (which is being played in Atlanta) has the Falcons favored... and despite the fact that Atlanta will get another home game (if they win), while Seattle will get another road game (if they win)... the books will pay you more if Atlanta wins the SB than they will if Seattle wins it, on the same dollar bet...
don't tell me the sharps are on Atlanta... because the books are making a VERY CLEAR STATEMENT that they believe Seattle is the better football team... and not just on a neutral field!
you wanna talk about being sharp... consider this: i was at a Vegas sportsbook yesterday, observing the futures odds... the odds on Seattle winning the Super Bowl were (+500)... odds on Atlanta wiinning the SB were (+550)...
so, the line on this game (which is being played in Atlanta) has the Falcons favored... and despite the fact that Atlanta will get another home game (if they win), while Seattle will get another road game (if they win)... the books will pay you more if Atlanta wins the SB than they will if Seattle wins it, on the same dollar bet...
don't tell me the sharps are on Atlanta... because the books are making a VERY CLEAR STATEMENT that they believe Seattle is the better football team... and not just on a neutral field!
you wanna talk about being sharp... consider this: i was at a Vegas sportsbook yesterday, observing the futures odds... the odds on Seattle winning the Super Bowl were (+500)... odds on Atlanta wiinning the SB were (+550)...
so, the line on this game (which is being played in Atlanta) has the Falcons favored... and despite the fact that Atlanta will get another home game (if they win), while Seattle will get another road game (if they win)... the books will pay you more if Atlanta wins the SB than they will if Seattle wins it, on the same dollar bet...
don't tell me the sharps are on Atlanta... because the books are making a VERY CLEAR STATEMENT that they believe Seattle is the better football team... and not just on a neutral field!
I wouldn't read too much into this.....books have a large futures exposure to Sea & virtually none to Atl winning SB. Atl is the team books have least futures exposure on.
you wanna talk about being sharp... consider this: i was at a Vegas sportsbook yesterday, observing the futures odds... the odds on Seattle winning the Super Bowl were (+500)... odds on Atlanta wiinning the SB were (+550)...
so, the line on this game (which is being played in Atlanta) has the Falcons favored... and despite the fact that Atlanta will get another home game (if they win), while Seattle will get another road game (if they win)... the books will pay you more if Atlanta wins the SB than they will if Seattle wins it, on the same dollar bet...
don't tell me the sharps are on Atlanta... because the books are making a VERY CLEAR STATEMENT that they believe Seattle is the better football team... and not just on a neutral field!
I wouldn't read too much into this.....books have a large futures exposure to Sea & virtually none to Atl winning SB. Atl is the team books have least futures exposure on.
To me seattle is getting screwes with this scheduling. Its a 1 pm game so 10am their time on east coast. Travel and really early start for them is disadvantage in my eyes
To me seattle is getting screwes with this scheduling. Its a 1 pm game so 10am their time on east coast. Travel and really early start for them is disadvantage in my eyes
I wouldn't read too much into this.....books have a large futures exposure to Sea & virtually none to Atl winning SB. Atl is the team books have least futures exposure on.
i'm sure there is some truth to this... but i still think it's worth noting where they have the odds right now...
I wouldn't read too much into this.....books have a large futures exposure to Sea & virtually none to Atl winning SB. Atl is the team books have least futures exposure on.
i'm sure there is some truth to this... but i still think it's worth noting where they have the odds right now...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.