There was, of course, a time
when a person just took the Ravens in this spot and got his +3 turnovers
and a defensive TD or two and cashed in. Not so much that way anymore. Flacco's QB rating at home this year is 100.6, his TD/Int ratio is 15-5. Ravens 6-2, 3-5 at home this year. Ravens avg.
home score 32-22. Combined record of Ravens home victims is 48-48.
Luck and Indy are 4-4,4-4 on the road. Luck's road rating is avg.73,
TD/Int ratio 11-13,Indy avg score away is 18-29. Colts road wins were
vs. Ten, Jax, Det and KC, whose combined W/L is 14-50. Indy's
road losses were to Chi,Jets, Hst, and NE. Avg score was 18-41. Lucks
QB rating in the road losses is 66. I don't know about
you, but these stats don't encourage me to take the Colts. Having said
that, 7 is still a lot of points to lay, but the Ravens have won their
last three Wild Card games; I'll take the home team and all that
experience.
Bal-7 vs. Ind one star
Sea-2.5 at Wsh
RGIII
began his NFL career with a bang and hasn't looked back. QB rating of
102 with a 20-5 TD/Int ration ani't bad for a rookie. Twelve of his 20
TDs came second half, along with 2 of his 5 ints. His QB rating is
similar for both halves. Russell Wilson, on the other hand, has been a much improved QB the second half. Hawks first 8 he compiled an 84 rating
with 10 TDs and 8 ints.
Second half has him at a 116 rating, 16 TDs and 2 ints.
Both Wsh and Sea have gone 7-1 the second half, but the Seahawks have
won their games by an avg. 23 pts while the Skins have managed "only" a
10 pt. avg margin of victory. Sea Hawks opps. were a combined 62-65-1,
Red Skins opps were 55-73 Using averages is the surest way to go broke
in this activity, but they do provide some perspective.
This is a tough one and the O/U does not appeal either. I will go with
the Seattle; they just have that "look" to them and I thought I saw
just a little weakness in Washington's game vs. Dallas.
Sea-2.5 at Wsh one star
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Wild Card cont. Yesterday: 2-0
Bal-7 vs. Ind
There was, of course, a time
when a person just took the Ravens in this spot and got his +3 turnovers
and a defensive TD or two and cashed in. Not so much that way anymore. Flacco's QB rating at home this year is 100.6, his TD/Int ratio is 15-5. Ravens 6-2, 3-5 at home this year. Ravens avg.
home score 32-22. Combined record of Ravens home victims is 48-48.
Luck and Indy are 4-4,4-4 on the road. Luck's road rating is avg.73,
TD/Int ratio 11-13,Indy avg score away is 18-29. Colts road wins were
vs. Ten, Jax, Det and KC, whose combined W/L is 14-50. Indy's
road losses were to Chi,Jets, Hst, and NE. Avg score was 18-41. Lucks
QB rating in the road losses is 66. I don't know about
you, but these stats don't encourage me to take the Colts. Having said
that, 7 is still a lot of points to lay, but the Ravens have won their
last three Wild Card games; I'll take the home team and all that
experience.
Bal-7 vs. Ind one star
Sea-2.5 at Wsh
RGIII
began his NFL career with a bang and hasn't looked back. QB rating of
102 with a 20-5 TD/Int ration ani't bad for a rookie. Twelve of his 20
TDs came second half, along with 2 of his 5 ints. His QB rating is
similar for both halves. Russell Wilson, on the other hand, has been a much improved QB the second half. Hawks first 8 he compiled an 84 rating
with 10 TDs and 8 ints.
Second half has him at a 116 rating, 16 TDs and 2 ints.
Both Wsh and Sea have gone 7-1 the second half, but the Seahawks have
won their games by an avg. 23 pts while the Skins have managed "only" a
10 pt. avg margin of victory. Sea Hawks opps. were a combined 62-65-1,
Red Skins opps were 55-73 Using averages is the surest way to go broke
in this activity, but they do provide some perspective.
This is a tough one and the O/U does not appeal either. I will go with
the Seattle; they just have that "look" to them and I thought I saw
just a little weakness in Washington's game vs. Dallas.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.