'Dies and Gents, Boys and Girls, fellow fans and gamblers:
Here's this weeks predictions, that's what the numbers suggest doesn't mean i necesarilly agree with all of them. It's just a starting point for now.
Trying to post early, to give you folks a chance of chipping in your two cents before the weekend. The idea is to fine tune this baby, and hit my local book.
JAC 24 CAR 21 (i don't see Cam newton losing this one, this is wack)
DEN24 TEN20
HOU35 NO 27
DET31 MIN17
GIA20 PHI27
NE41 BUF24
MIA23 CLE22
SF27 CIN24
JET31 OAK31
BAL34 STL13
KC23 SD30
ATL23 TB27
GB28 CHI26 (can chicago keep it this close?)
ARI34 SEA21 (can seattle score?)
PIT28 IND20 (kerry collins, breathing down pitt's neck, never!)
WAS24 DAL22
Thanks to all who chipped in last week, and to those who def will this week.
Best of luck to all
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
'Dies and Gents, Boys and Girls, fellow fans and gamblers:
Here's this weeks predictions, that's what the numbers suggest doesn't mean i necesarilly agree with all of them. It's just a starting point for now.
Trying to post early, to give you folks a chance of chipping in your two cents before the weekend. The idea is to fine tune this baby, and hit my local book.
JAC 24 CAR 21 (i don't see Cam newton losing this one, this is wack)
DEN24 TEN20
HOU35 NO 27
DET31 MIN17
GIA20 PHI27
NE41 BUF24
MIA23 CLE22
SF27 CIN24
JET31 OAK31
BAL34 STL13
KC23 SD30
ATL23 TB27
GB28 CHI26 (can chicago keep it this close?)
ARI34 SEA21 (can seattle score?)
PIT28 IND20 (kerry collins, breathing down pitt's neck, never!)
WAS24 DAL22
Thanks to all who chipped in last week, and to those who def will this week.
I like both your over games as well.. will be following you on those this week. check out my page and tell me what you think of my picks when you get a chance.
0
I like both your over games as well.. will be following you on those this week. check out my page and tell me what you think of my picks when you get a chance.
You predict TB will win a tight game and only by four. Covering by only 2 pts. So why bet them instead HOU who is +4 and you predict to win by 8. Covering by 12!
0
You predict TB will win a tight game and only by four. Covering by only 2 pts. So why bet them instead HOU who is +4 and you predict to win by 8. Covering by 12!
WDE: your the man, your upset specials were 2-0 last week.
I like Cam Newtons chances of getting the 1st Win of the season. Agree 100%.
I can also see NO getting it done, without Arian Foster not the same houston team.
Denver to beat anyone is a stretch. So you already proved Ten is not just a "homer" pick when they beat balto. If they beat Balto, don't see why they don't beat the Denver Donkeys.
PackFan: Because those numbers/predictions don't account for injuries. You gotta factor that in on your own, afterwards (subjectively) Arian Foster hamstring likely out, i know Tate is big but not the same. So i don't know how many pts AF should deduct, but don't love the play without the teams full weapon arsenal at their disposal. Saint's are no pushover.
GreenIsGood: Atlanta just came from an emotional game, they had to beat VICK. They left it all in the field, and i would assume they are feeling good about themselves. Recipe for a letdown even though it's still a divisional game. TB on the other hand, just came back to win a game they were trailing by 17pts. That makes a team believe.
DaSaltySlug: I expect there to be points in the Oakland game. What do you think of Jets Run D vs McFadden?
0
WDE: your the man, your upset specials were 2-0 last week.
I like Cam Newtons chances of getting the 1st Win of the season. Agree 100%.
I can also see NO getting it done, without Arian Foster not the same houston team.
Denver to beat anyone is a stretch. So you already proved Ten is not just a "homer" pick when they beat balto. If they beat Balto, don't see why they don't beat the Denver Donkeys.
PackFan: Because those numbers/predictions don't account for injuries. You gotta factor that in on your own, afterwards (subjectively) Arian Foster hamstring likely out, i know Tate is big but not the same. So i don't know how many pts AF should deduct, but don't love the play without the teams full weapon arsenal at their disposal. Saint's are no pushover.
GreenIsGood: Atlanta just came from an emotional game, they had to beat VICK. They left it all in the field, and i would assume they are feeling good about themselves. Recipe for a letdown even though it's still a divisional game. TB on the other hand, just came back to win a game they were trailing by 17pts. That makes a team believe.
DaSaltySlug: I expect there to be points in the Oakland game. What do you think of Jets Run D vs McFadden?
Tbh I don't think anyone lately has been able to stop McFadden... he does what he wants lol..jets run D shouldn't hold him from getting those big yards.. he might be the reason why they clutch this game. =)
0
Tbh I don't think anyone lately has been able to stop McFadden... he does what he wants lol..jets run D shouldn't hold him from getting those big yards.. he might be the reason why they clutch this game. =)
The Pats are ... the Pats. Meanwhile, people in Buffalo are drinking the kool aid based on wins over (wait for it) Kansas City (perhaps the worst team of the last 10 years) and the hit and miss Oakland Raiders (beating Jason Campbell isn't a feat since everyone has done it).
Pats win by AT LEAST 10. In addition to Brady over Ryan F - we also have Bill Belichick over Chan Gailey. That isn't even fair.
0
Quote Originally Posted by buffalo11:
41-24 pats??
The Pats are ... the Pats. Meanwhile, people in Buffalo are drinking the kool aid based on wins over (wait for it) Kansas City (perhaps the worst team of the last 10 years) and the hit and miss Oakland Raiders (beating Jason Campbell isn't a feat since everyone has done it).
Pats win by AT LEAST 10. In addition to Brady over Ryan F - we also have Bill Belichick over Chan Gailey. That isn't even fair.
JAC +3.5 is not that bad. Everyone is on the CAR bandwagon(i was too). I remember people were talking that Blaine Gabbert was a better QB around the draft time. Now Cam Newton's all over the media. Just sayin, I liked Ron Rivera as an Offensive Coord, he's smart but it's not going to be easy by any means. The FG plus half is worth a lot if it's a low scoring game.
ARI-3.5 against the Sea-hens, all day!
NE-7 love it.
Wash+3 looks good with dallas banged up QB,WR,RB's.
Bal-4 money right there. SF+1.5 should also hit. DET-3
I have a soft spot for OAK, if they can keep it up for the 2H they should be in the game. Jets traveling coast to coast. I'm tired of hearing Revis this, Revis that, let's see how he does against Denarious Moore.
Plays i don't like:
INDY, there is not enough chalk in this world for me to back them. ATL, but im biased there. Chi is iffy, if they can stop AR, and keep it low scoring then maybe, but GB is mean right now.
0
WDE: Here's the plays i like from your list:
JAC +3.5 is not that bad. Everyone is on the CAR bandwagon(i was too). I remember people were talking that Blaine Gabbert was a better QB around the draft time. Now Cam Newton's all over the media. Just sayin, I liked Ron Rivera as an Offensive Coord, he's smart but it's not going to be easy by any means. The FG plus half is worth a lot if it's a low scoring game.
ARI-3.5 against the Sea-hens, all day!
NE-7 love it.
Wash+3 looks good with dallas banged up QB,WR,RB's.
Bal-4 money right there. SF+1.5 should also hit. DET-3
I have a soft spot for OAK, if they can keep it up for the 2H they should be in the game. Jets traveling coast to coast. I'm tired of hearing Revis this, Revis that, let's see how he does against Denarious Moore.
Plays i don't like:
INDY, there is not enough chalk in this world for me to back them. ATL, but im biased there. Chi is iffy, if they can stop AR, and keep it low scoring then maybe, but GB is mean right now.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.