All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

KC (+2.5) dogs at Oak!! week 9

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2003
Posts: 26
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1684
Posted: #1
line is from Bookmaker.com

(1) if we give 3 points to the home team, then we're saying these two teams are about even right now?..

(2) the raiders hadn't won 2 games in a row since 2008.  now we're supposed to think they'll win 3 in a row?..

(3) KC: 7th ranked run D, Oak: 26th run D...yeah, they stuffed Sea today, but KC's run O is of a slightly different caliber..

(3) Tom Cable vs. Todd Haley, Charlie Weis, and Romeo Crennel...hmm..
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 917
Posted: #2
like where your going, plus, don't forget the road team notoriously covers in this series
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1684
Posted: #3
there is usually some line every week that makes you go, "whaaa?"

but somebody is going to have to convince me to not put $$ on this very soon..

let's hear it, Oak backers..
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 917
Posted: #4
yeah I agree, same with Jets- 3.5 @ Det, had to put just a little on that early, that number has to shoot up quick
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by YouWish:

there is usually some line every week that makes you go, "whaaa?"

but somebody is going to have to convince me to not put $$ on this very soon..

let's hear it, Oak backers..



Road team is 14-2 ATS in this series  
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 647
Posted: #6
raiders all day ...dont bet against a hot hand! gambling rule 101
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #7

Quote Originally Posted by jnemeh:

raiders all day ...dont bet against a hot hand! gambling rule 101

Really? I bet against the Jets today who had won 5 straight ATS

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #8

Quote Originally Posted by jnemeh:

raiders all day ...dont bet against a hot hand! gambling rule 101

Oh yeah, I also bet against Utah Saturday who had won 6 straight, I bet on Iowa against Michigan State who had won 5 straight ATS and against Ohio who had won 5 straight ATS.

You know what? I won them all.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1961
Posted: #9
I'm a big Raiders fan but KC wins this game... raiders have covered 4 in a row now... that's gonna come to a screeching hault I believe.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1961
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner:

Oh yeah, I also bet against Utah Saturday who had won 6 straight, I bet on Iowa against Michigan State who had won 5 straight ATS and against Ohio who had won 5 straight ATS.

You know what? I won them all.




DING DING DING!  My new friend....


 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 11316
Posted: #11
who would have guessed at this point in the season this would actually be a pretty anticipated game   crazy nfl season
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 11316
Posted: #12

Quote Originally Posted by jnemeh:

raiders all day ...dont bet against a hot hand! gambling rule 101

  spoken like a true square

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 11316
Posted: #13

Youwish-  i think your 4th (labeled 3 tho) point about the coaches is the most legit, i like where your heads at

also oakland has inflated public opinion.  kc looks legit

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by jnemeh:

raiders all day ...dont bet against a hot hand! gambling rule 101



Hot?  They won 2 in a row just like the Chiefs. By the way, the road team in this series is 14-2 ATS past 16 road games.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 52430
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner:

Oh yeah, I also bet against Utah Saturday who had won 6 straight, I bet on Iowa against Michigan State who had won 5 straight ATS and against Ohio who had won 5 straight ATS.

You know what? I won them all.

 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 491
Posted: #16
dont buck a trend follow it ....or stay away ...there is a new game everyday
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 149
Posted: #17
raiders won 2 in a row
some will say no way raiders win 3 in a row
some will say raiders are for real.
and books will make money getting action on both side
one thing i know, raiders is playing a decent football , we have to see if this continues, i hope for oakland they win 3 in a row.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 6307
Posted: #18
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 933
Posted: #19
cant wait for this game (how long has it been since we could say that about a kc/oak game?) this should be straight up smash-mouth fb...screw a side give me the under all day...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1684
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by Michfan15:

Youwish-  i think your 4th (labeled 3 tho) point about the coaches is the most legit, i like where your heads at

also oakland has inflated public opinion.  kc looks legit



yeah, and look who Cable beat in their last three wins: Pete Carrol, Josh McDaniels, and Norv Turner...big step up in competition with KC's guys...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 39
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by Michfan15:

Youwish-  i think your 4th (labeled 3 tho) point about the coaches is the most legit, i like where your heads at

also oakland has inflated public opinion.  kc looks legit

 

oakland has inflated public opinion? already? after only 2 wins? a team that sucks and has sucked over the past 7 seasons? come on man now u sound like the ....

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 11316
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by diezel261:

 

oakland has inflated public opinion? already? after only 2 wins? a team that sucks and has sucked over the past 7 seasons? come on man now u sound like the ....

if you follow football in anyway you will know the public is all over oaklands dick...constantly being talked about on espn for something other than losing is not something oakland is used to, 

Yes they do have an inflated public perception

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 10748
Posted: #23
  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 10748
Posted: #24
  
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 267
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by Michfan15:

if you follow football in anyway you will know the public is all over oaklands dick...constantly being talked about on espn for something other than losing is not something oakland is used to, 

Yes they do have an inflated public perception


Absolutely.  I listened to a couple podcasts from vegas oddsmakers this week who mentioned how the bubble has burst on Oakland and Detroit.  They were two teams sharps were hammering the last couple weeks but its just like any investment...if you have heard about it...its probably too late
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.