I dont know about you guys, but this line looks like a slow cooked ham in late November. I see posts on here for people taking the Bears and calling it an easy play... and my question for them would HAVE to be... have you watched any football this year?
GB is sick. Their defense is just getting going (Clay Matthews might have 4 sacks tonight) and their offense is nuts. They will probably put up 35 against this piece of shit Chicago team.
Rewind, Cutler had 6 INT's against GB in last years 2 meetings and spent more time on his back than he did on his feet. GB has not looked its best so far this year and they STILL are rolling over teams.
If there is a play on this game it would be GB -3 and/or the over (46.5). Anyone who says - " I am taking Chicago because all signs point to GB and that seems too easy" .... you should probably donate your TV/Computer to your nearest Goodwill.
Comments? Suggestions? Arguments? Am I crazy?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I dont know about you guys, but this line looks like a slow cooked ham in late November. I see posts on here for people taking the Bears and calling it an easy play... and my question for them would HAVE to be... have you watched any football this year?
GB is sick. Their defense is just getting going (Clay Matthews might have 4 sacks tonight) and their offense is nuts. They will probably put up 35 against this piece of shit Chicago team.
Rewind, Cutler had 6 INT's against GB in last years 2 meetings and spent more time on his back than he did on his feet. GB has not looked its best so far this year and they STILL are rolling over teams.
If there is a play on this game it would be GB -3 and/or the over (46.5). Anyone who says - " I am taking Chicago because all signs point to GB and that seems too easy" .... you should probably donate your TV/Computer to your nearest Goodwill.
I'm not leaning any way on this game in particular, but after years of watching this league, how can you not see that a spread between these two division rivals on Monday Night rarely gets past the 3 point mark? These are two NFL teams, anyone can lose or win at anytime. Sure, oddsmakers give the lean to GB, but even with as much hype/expectations as they've had, it's not by much. That should tell you something right there.
It sounds like you've got it all figured out, though. If you like GB so much, I'd stick with my gut and hammer this play. Sticking with your gut is the only way to go. GL tonight
0
I'm not leaning any way on this game in particular, but after years of watching this league, how can you not see that a spread between these two division rivals on Monday Night rarely gets past the 3 point mark? These are two NFL teams, anyone can lose or win at anytime. Sure, oddsmakers give the lean to GB, but even with as much hype/expectations as they've had, it's not by much. That should tell you something right there.
It sounds like you've got it all figured out, though. If you like GB so much, I'd stick with my gut and hammer this play. Sticking with your gut is the only way to go. GL tonight
I dont know about you guys, but this line looks like a slow cooked ham in late November. I see posts on here for people taking the Bears and calling it an easy play... and my question for them would HAVE to be... have you watched any football this year?
GB is sick. Their defense is just getting going (Clay Matthews might have 4 sacks tonight) and their offense is nuts. They will probably put up 35 against this piece of shit Chicago team.
Rewind, Cutler had 6 INT's against GB in last years 2 meetings and spent more time on his back than he did on his feet. GB has not looked its best so far this year and they STILL are rolling over teams.
If there is a play on this game it would be GB -3 and/or the over (46.5). Anyone who says - " I am taking Chicago because all signs point to GB and that seems too easy" .... you should probably donate your TV/Computer to your nearest Goodwill.
Comments? Suggestions? Arguments? Am I crazy?
im going to have to say
"I am taking Chicago because all signs point to GB and that seems too easy"
On a monday night, when this is the only game going on, im going to have to play the 25% than the 75%
0
Quote Originally Posted by 11stan11:
I dont know about you guys, but this line looks like a slow cooked ham in late November. I see posts on here for people taking the Bears and calling it an easy play... and my question for them would HAVE to be... have you watched any football this year?
GB is sick. Their defense is just getting going (Clay Matthews might have 4 sacks tonight) and their offense is nuts. They will probably put up 35 against this piece of shit Chicago team.
Rewind, Cutler had 6 INT's against GB in last years 2 meetings and spent more time on his back than he did on his feet. GB has not looked its best so far this year and they STILL are rolling over teams.
If there is a play on this game it would be GB -3 and/or the over (46.5). Anyone who says - " I am taking Chicago because all signs point to GB and that seems too easy" .... you should probably donate your TV/Computer to your nearest Goodwill.
Comments? Suggestions? Arguments? Am I crazy?
im going to have to say
"I am taking Chicago because all signs point to GB and that seems too easy"
On a monday night, when this is the only game going on, im going to have to play the 25% than the 75%
You kinda discredited yourself with the "piece of shit Chicago team" thing. Have you watched their games? Their offense is not the same one from last season. And their defense is not the same with Peppers and Urlacher. These are two really good teams facing off. Have you watched any football? Home teams on Monday night. Shit, the fugly 49'ers almost and should have beaten the Saints on Monday night. Home teams are hard to beat Monday nights. This is a tough game, pretty much a tossup. Turnovers should decide. If you think this is an easy game, step back and think.
0
You kinda discredited yourself with the "piece of shit Chicago team" thing. Have you watched their games? Their offense is not the same one from last season. And their defense is not the same with Peppers and Urlacher. These are two really good teams facing off. Have you watched any football? Home teams on Monday night. Shit, the fugly 49'ers almost and should have beaten the Saints on Monday night. Home teams are hard to beat Monday nights. This is a tough game, pretty much a tossup. Turnovers should decide. If you think this is an easy game, step back and think.
Chicago should have lost at home to Detroit. Peppers helps, but Rodges is also plenty mobile. I do think it's a tight game, but I'm not sold in Chicago just yet. GB looked plenty comfy on the road v. Philly.
0
Chicago should have lost at home to Detroit. Peppers helps, but Rodges is also plenty mobile. I do think it's a tight game, but I'm not sold in Chicago just yet. GB looked plenty comfy on the road v. Philly.
It's a long season, home team dogs on Monday night are hot right now and should out-perform the road favorite, no matter who it is, over the season. They are 3-0 ATS and I'm staying with. If Chicago blows it, I go to 3-1 ATS, no big deal. I'll wait for the next one.
0
It's a long season, home team dogs on Monday night are hot right now and should out-perform the road favorite, no matter who it is, over the season. They are 3-0 ATS and I'm staying with. If Chicago blows it, I go to 3-1 ATS, no big deal. I'll wait for the next one.
GB looked good against Philly And Bears looked good against the Cowboys both places difficult to win on the road.
It is going to come down to injuries, both teams have some significant injuries.
GB is without Ryan Grant and their running game is suffering. Pro-bowl tackle Clifton is out.
Bears will be with their tackle chris williams and safety major wright.
If GB O-line can keep Peepers out of the backfield, Rodgers will be able to take advantage of average at best Bears secondary. but when clifton was out last year vs Minn, Jared allen was running all over the backfield.
the Bears need to keep clay mathews in check which will be tough, least they have a running game to fall back on to keep pass rushers honest.
0
GB looked good against Philly And Bears looked good against the Cowboys both places difficult to win on the road.
It is going to come down to injuries, both teams have some significant injuries.
GB is without Ryan Grant and their running game is suffering. Pro-bowl tackle Clifton is out.
Bears will be with their tackle chris williams and safety major wright.
If GB O-line can keep Peepers out of the backfield, Rodgers will be able to take advantage of average at best Bears secondary. but when clifton was out last year vs Minn, Jared allen was running all over the backfield.
the Bears need to keep clay mathews in check which will be tough, least they have a running game to fall back on to keep pass rushers honest.
just with 75 percent on the packers is enough for me too take the bears i really thought people would of been taking bears here but i was wrong like usually glad too c u on the packs though
0
just with 75 percent on the packers is enough for me too take the bears i really thought people would of been taking bears here but i was wrong like usually glad too c u on the packs though
Clifton is starting from what I read. And trust me, he's a long way from being a Pro Bowler these days. He's on his last legs. They actually might be better off with Bulaga the rookie starting at Left Tackle.
LINK Down on the bottom is some info about Clifton.
0
"Pro-bowl tackle Clifton is out."
Clifton is starting from what I read. And trust me, he's a long way from being a Pro Bowler these days. He's on his last legs. They actually might be better off with Bulaga the rookie starting at Left Tackle.
LINK Down on the bottom is some info about Clifton.
You kinda discredited yourself with the "piece of shit Chicago team" thing. Have you watched their games? Their offense is not the same one from last season. And their defense is not the same with Peppers and Urlacher. These are two really good teams facing off. Have you watched any football? Home teams on Monday night. Shit, the fugly 49'ers almost and should have beaten the Saints on Monday night. Home teams are hard to beat Monday nights. This is a tough game, pretty much a tossup. Turnovers should decide. If you think this is an easy game, step back and think.
If you watch the bears and honestly think they are not sub-par then you are biased. I by no means have it all figured out (otherwise I wouldnt be posting on this site, id be sipping martini's in Tahiti).
I agree it could end up being a tight game but I am not betting against the superior team simply because it is Monday. GB still has a lot to prove which is why my money is on them stomping the bears.
35-17, lock it in
0
Quote Originally Posted by depeche2:
You kinda discredited yourself with the "piece of shit Chicago team" thing. Have you watched their games? Their offense is not the same one from last season. And their defense is not the same with Peppers and Urlacher. These are two really good teams facing off. Have you watched any football? Home teams on Monday night. Shit, the fugly 49'ers almost and should have beaten the Saints on Monday night. Home teams are hard to beat Monday nights. This is a tough game, pretty much a tossup. Turnovers should decide. If you think this is an easy game, step back and think.
If you watch the bears and honestly think they are not sub-par then you are biased. I by no means have it all figured out (otherwise I wouldnt be posting on this site, id be sipping martini's in Tahiti).
I agree it could end up being a tight game but I am not betting against the superior team simply because it is Monday. GB still has a lot to prove which is why my money is on them stomping the bears.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.