in any Jets game this year. They have either won outright as a dog or failed miserably as a favorite/dog.
What does that mean this week? 
It means just pick a winner of the game and the spread will be covered. Makes it a bit easier not having to worry about the cover w/ the points either way, but if you like the Jets, the play is obviously the Moneyline.
Very true....trends all come to an end eventually but couple this one up with the one where in Championship games the winner of the game is 65-0-2 and I believe you have a foundation for a good bet w/o the rectal itch of worrying about the point spread coming into play. Now I'd like some validation on the second trend here as I read it here on Covers someplace but I know that a small percentage of games are determined by the pointspread so it did not surprise me at all to see such a stat.
I have no idea because I don't know what you were trying to say.
Well Hutch, I read on here that in the last 67 Championship games played that in 65 of them the spread did not come into play. In other words the if the favorite won the game, it also covered the spread. If the dog won the game, it obviously covered the spread. There must have been 2 ties also there for it to go 65-0-2. So I believe this game will be like the last 67 and if you like the dog, take the moneyline and get the extra cash or save the juice if they lose because if they lose they will not cover the spread anyway.
Well Hutch, I read on here that in the last 67 Championship games played that in 65 of them the spread did not come into play. In other words the if the favorite won the game, it also covered the spread. If the dog won the game, it obviously covered the spread. There must have been 2 ties also there for it to go 65-0-2. So I believe this game will be like the last 67 and if you like the dog, take the moneyline and get the extra cash or save the juice if they lose because if they lose they will not cover the spread anyway.
If that is true, I will eat my balls. Impossible.
This stat is for Championship games over the years only, not Colts games.
Hutch,
I'm certain your balls are a tastey morsel but without checking the validity of such a trend, check with your wife before boiling. LOL
Very true....trends all come to an end eventually but couple this one up with the one where in Championship games the winner of the game is 65-0-2 and I believe you have a foundation for a good bet w/o the rectal itch of worrying about the point spread coming into play. Now I'd like some validation on the second trend here as I read it here on Covers someplace but I know that a small percentage of games are determined by the pointspread so it did not surprise me at all to see such a stat.
You have to add that the pointspread is less than 10 points in those 67 games.
2 years ago the patriots won su but the chargers got the money.
2002 the rams won su but the eagles covered making the current run 14-2 ats by the su winner.
January 2000 NFC champ. rams win su but dont cover v. tampa bay. Current run now 17-3 ats by the su winner.
Spreads over 10 points in those games, I believe it's true, 65-0-2
The 65-0-2 is with spreads less than 10 points
You have to add that the pointspread is less than 10 points in those 67 games.
Thank you PrimeTime, I forgot that caveat. As a matter of fact I believe it was your thread that I got that info from originally and think it to be good information on handicapping this weeks games. That's an awful tough trend to go against IMHO and do not believe at this point that the Jets will beat Indy outright so my lean is to laying the lumber and not worrying about a Jets backdoor cover.
Well Hutch, I read on here that in the last 67 Championship games played that in 65 of them the spread did not come into play. In other words the if the favorite won the game, it also covered the spread. If the dog won the game, it obviously covered the spread. There must have been 2 ties also there for it to go 65-0-2. So I believe this game will be like the last 67 and if you like the dog, take the moneyline and get the extra cash or save the juice if they lose because if they lose they will not cover the spread anyway.
if thats the case just play colts -7.5 for $200 and play jets ml +300 for $100 and you win either way.
Pretty sure the Eagles were less then 10 points when the lost but covered against the Rams?
Rams -11 over Philly
Remember, that was the 14-2 Rams, the greatest show on turf Rams, who were off a SB Win just 2 years prior and Philly's first time in NFC championship game.
if thats the case just play colts -7.5 for $200 and play jets ml +300 for $100 and you win either way.
HMMMMMMMMMM. Kind of a box way to play it but we ARE in it for the money.
I kinda like the rectal itch and shitty feeling in the pit of my stomach at game time, LOL 
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
