Many people take into account the revenge factor of capping. I am a firm believer that history DOES NOT repeat itself when it comes to gambling. I’ve done a quick analysis of repeated matchups this season. Hope I got all of them:
Miami/NYJ
First Meeting: Miami Over
Second Meeting: Miami Over
Oakland/SD
First Meeting: Oakland Over
Second Meeting: Oakland Under
Minnesota/GB
First Meeting: Minnesota Over
Second Meeting: Minnesota Over
Baltimore/Cincy
First Meeting: Cincy Under
Second Meeting: Cindy Under
Detroit/Minnesota
First Meeting: Minnesota Under
Second Meeting: Minnesota Under
Atlanta/Carolina
First Meeting: Atlanta Over
Second Meeting: Carolina Over
KC/Oak
First Meeting: Oakland Under
Second Meeting: KC Under
Seattle/Arizona
First Meeting: Arizona Under
Second Meeting: Arizona Over
Baltimore/Cleveland
First Meeting: Baltimore Under
Second Meeting: Baltimore Under
SD/Denver
First Meeting: Den Over
Second Meeting: SD Under
NYJ/NE
First Meeting: NYJ Under
Second Meeting: NE, PUSH
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Many people take into account the revenge factor of capping. I am a firm believer that history DOES NOT repeat itself when it comes to gambling. I’ve done a quick analysis of repeated matchups this season. Hope I got all of them:
According to these stats, the team that has covered the first meeting has covered the second meeting 7/11 times this season. The same exact outcome 5 times out of 11. I think it is beginning to even out, as the last two games this past weekend have had opposite outcomes.
What this is leading to is an analysis on the Detroit/GB game. In the first meeting, there was no Stafford of Johnson. In the second meeting it is the same scenario, with the same line. The first meeting the line was -14. It is now -11 with the 3 pt adjustment for home field advantage.
So logically, same teams should produce the same outcomes correct? NOT. This includes Detroit being known as getting trounced every Thanksgiving.
I believe Detroit is the play here, however all the favorites have covered like 3 years in a row. Sometimes trends/traditions cannot be broken.
0
According to these stats, the team that has covered the first meeting has covered the second meeting 7/11 times this season. The same exact outcome 5 times out of 11. I think it is beginning to even out, as the last two games this past weekend have had opposite outcomes.
What this is leading to is an analysis on the Detroit/GB game. In the first meeting, there was no Stafford of Johnson. In the second meeting it is the same scenario, with the same line. The first meeting the line was -14. It is now -11 with the 3 pt adjustment for home field advantage.
So logically, same teams should produce the same outcomes correct? NOT. This includes Detroit being known as getting trounced every Thanksgiving.
I believe Detroit is the play here, however all the favorites have covered like 3 years in a row. Sometimes trends/traditions cannot be broken.
What makes the line even shadier is that Green Bay is rolling right now. Fresh off a big win vs. Dallas, and a domination of San Fran until a backdoor cover in the second half.
Detroit is coming across their first win in a long time. However, they are missing their big play guys from that game. They also didn't cover that game, which means they have not covered 5 games in a row. You would think the line would be adjusted because of it. I count the Minnesota game as a loss because it only shows a push on covers because of very late line movement. It was 16.5 all week.
Yes, I know Green Bay is missing two defensive personnel. But a 36-0 first meeting is pretty telling here.
0
What makes the line even shadier is that Green Bay is rolling right now. Fresh off a big win vs. Dallas, and a domination of San Fran until a backdoor cover in the second half.
Detroit is coming across their first win in a long time. However, they are missing their big play guys from that game. They also didn't cover that game, which means they have not covered 5 games in a row. You would think the line would be adjusted because of it. I count the Minnesota game as a loss because it only shows a push on covers because of very late line movement. It was 16.5 all week.
Yes, I know Green Bay is missing two defensive personnel. But a 36-0 first meeting is pretty telling here.
I like it. Keep in mind home field is mostly 3 points in each direction. So if the first Det/GB game is 14 in GB. The next one in Det. would be 8 not 11.
0
Slam,
I like it. Keep in mind home field is mostly 3 points in each direction. So if the first Det/GB game is 14 in GB. The next one in Det. would be 8 not 11.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.