Peep's pick... got it from some guy at work!

No service plays

did he really say tails and the coin toss? 

  NO BRAINER

I'm only gonna play the ML for Indy... its a for sure win! 

Lang is a loser, but he has hit 18 super bowls in a row. That is the only game he can win it seems. The rest of the time , fade material.

Sorry  17  in a row

 

 

Agree with pretty much everything said about teams who have "lucked" into the game.....

tails never fails

tails never fails    ----- NEVER use the word NEVER and ALWAYS when you see those words run the other way. Think about it.......Liars, con men, salesmen, any one who wants convince you of something.  -  also used when they want you to fall for the wrong answer on a test.    RECONSIDER.

This guy's a crock of BS guys.

First, he forgets to mention the 49ers were completely dominated in the NFC championship game by Dallas,

 1ST downs Dallas 29, 49ers 19,

total yards Dallas 451, 49ers 294,

ave gain per play Dallas 5.6, 49ers 4.9,

however the 49ers won the TO battle by 4 TO, who's that sound like. It's exact same senerio as NO and the 49ers cruched SD in the SB.

Talk about a game gift wrapped !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BUT OF COARSE HE MENTIONS SD GETTING OUT-GAINED BY PITT, "DOES HE JUST MENTION THE GAMES THAT FIT HIS AGENDA ??????"

Second, he's bragging about the 2006 SB between Pitt and Seattle, give-me-a-break-dude !!!!!!!!!!!!

This SB Pitt got every damn call in the game, even calls the league came out and said were wrong calls made against Seattle, "AND IT HAD THE BIGGEST DIFFERENCE IN PENALITY'S OF ANY SB IN HISTORY".

AND BIG BEN POSTED THE WORST QB PASSER RATING BY A WIDE MARGIN OF ANY WINNING QB IN HISTORY OF SB, HE ALSO POSTED ONE OF THE WORST FOR ANY LOSING TEAM IN HISTORY".

And this guys bragging about picking this game ?//%%#$&

Earth to So-Called Expert, if you picked Pitt, I wouldn't be bragging about how much you liked the game, " YOU WERE FAR MORE LUCKY THAN GOOD".

Guys, I'd be very, very careful with this guys info, in my time I've gunned-down more of these so-called experts than you can shake a stick at, and I'll do it again here on sunday.

The history of SB and the "key stats" which correlate very strong to teams covering the spread points to the Saints  with a very good chance to win the game,.

THE SAINTS WILL LEAD IN THIS GAME AND IF EITHER TEAM LEADS BY 14 OR MORE IT'LL BE THE SAINTS NOT THE COLTS !!!!!!!!!!!

 

I am back and forth on this game.  I loved the Colts up until watching the Saints Vikings game at a NO bar in Dallas.  It sure was fun saying Who Dat.

If the Saints play anything like they did against New England on MNF earlier this year, I think they win this game outright.

The Saints do have some depth and Minnesota's D is a heck of a lot better than the Colts.

But the Colts are the best team in the NFL (when healthy)...

indianapolis colts 41 new orleans saints 24

colts might win..but if your betting on them cuz of lang c a r e f u l l!!!......he is a ass clown and a scamer

Here we go again, every compares other games to the SuperBowl. The emotions in this game are enough of an intangible that you just can't compare what these teams did against teams in the playoffs.

I hate to admit it, but I agree with this prediction. On paper these teams are pretty evenly matched, except that Colts defense I think is better, but even that is arguable.

What I do know is that Manning calls his plays, if he doesn't like something he will change the play and he has the confidence of his offense coach as well as me. This is big factor. Manning make good decisions most of the time. Brees while good, often tries to squeeze the ball in to tight places and thank god he has talent to make him look good. In an emotional game like this, I have to go with the QB that is cool under pressure and thats Manning. If Manning is able to read that Saints defense say goodnight.

So there are 2 situations that favor the Colts.

1. If the game is close near the end Manning is cooler under pressure and is more likely to make less mistakes.

2. If Manning is able to read the defense, they will pull away and could easily double digit the Saints.

3. Experience, think about it. When you hire someone for a job, do you want someone with experience or one without. Its no different in football. Its possible to get someone without experience that turns out to be great, but more often the experienced person delivers more consistently.

My gut tells me that the Saints will try to conceal there defense which makes them a great play in the 1QTR, but I think there defense gets tired which will expose themselves to the Colts.

One last thing, if you think betting on the flip of the coin is stupid, consider this. The flip of the coin is one of the highest actions in SuperBowl action.

Oh yeah one more thing... who is Manning's favorite target? CLARK. That means that ball is going to come his way alot, the more times that ball goes to him increases your odds.

If you want to make money, be smart about your choices and increase your chances, by finding odds that better favor you.

it is my understanding that over half of these are undocumented...

Lang is a putz.

Saints in fact CAN win this game, and they don't need Peyton to go down w/ an injury either. NEW ORLEANS SCORES POINTS.

Thanks Brandon, now I love the Saints even more...

Another thing bothers me about this info.........

First, he's got his facts wrong, the 1992 Bills happened in Jan 1993, it didn't happen in the AFC Championship game but in the wild card game, and the Bills would go on to play Dallas not the Redskins.

His claim that a Oilers Redskins matchup was better had a long, long way before that matchup happened.

The other game he didn't think was important enough to mention was the Pats in 2002, when the refs gift wrap the game with the now famous tuck rule for the Pats andf they would go on to win the SB.

In the AFC championship game, the Pats scored on a punt return after they already had fair catched the punt but Pitt was called for penality then had to re-kick and Pats ran it back for a TD.

Then Pats returned a block punt for a TD after the ball had taken a perfect bounce right to the Pats player "in stride" and he then lateralled to teammate who scored.

On top of all this the Pats won the TO 4-0, and barely could win the game.

Talk about a gift wrapped game and back-to-back gift wrapped games, but that "did not prevent Pats from winning SB".

Info by itself is meaningless, it's how you interpt the info that makes it meaningful, and his interptation of the Bills 4 SB losses was that the Bills lost 1 SB because of the gift wrapped game in the wild card round, that's silly.

What about the other 3 losses, don't those 3 losses tell us alot more about the Bills, the Bills lost because they never played well on a big stage and their 4 losses tells us this, they also played some pretty damn good teams that were dominate, Dallas won 3 SB in 4 years, one of the great runs in history, Dallas played exceptionally well on a big stage, the Bills "did not lose to Dallas because of a gift wrapped game in the wild card round, that just about as weak and pathetically poor a job of interpting info I've seen, that's ESPN type stuff !! 

If Adam Meyer is the guy from the Sf Bay area that guy is horrible. Friend signed us up with him, he promised over 40 totals picks and a winning record and he stopped giving picks out after going 4-12. Besides that they double charged my friends credit card and then promised that they were going to give him $200 back which they never did. And they also said we will give you some more winning plays on a phone line and that was at about 33% and then on his website soem expert was giving make up plays for doing so bad and he went  0-3 that day. The are totally full of crap and horrible touts. 

And my friend is a paraplegic and is the nicest guy and did not want to argue with them  -I did it for him and they made a lot of promises they did not keep (Adam Meyer in SF area - beware). Adam probably has 20 on the money line