And for the record guys .......... ALL YOU HAVE TO DO TO GET INTO HEAVEN ACCORDING TO MY (CHRISTIAN) RELIGION IS :
Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and believe that he was sinless and Gods son. And that he died for your and my sins. So that we wouldnt have to go thru the pain he went thru.
John 3:16.......so beautiful
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
thats all you gotta do to get to heaven guys...... pretty easy................. but believing it means living a good and just life....... trying to help others.
0
And for the record guys .......... ALL YOU HAVE TO DO TO GET INTO HEAVEN ACCORDING TO MY (CHRISTIAN) RELIGION IS :
Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and believe that he was sinless and Gods son. And that he died for your and my sins. So that we wouldnt have to go thru the pain he went thru.
John 3:16.......so beautiful
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
thats all you gotta do to get to heaven guys...... pretty easy................. but believing it means living a good and just life....... trying to help others.
but we all know that you think theres no way God exists................ but lets discuss parallel universes and time travel.............. what a quack job.
If you really believe time travel ( excuse me ) could happen........... then why hasnt someone from the future ever come back to tell us anything...... gotta be at least one rogue time traveler out there.
Seriously you make fun of me for my belief( dont know why you get your jollies off that)........ but then post a link to topics of time travel and parallel universes.........QUACK JOB!
97% of nobel scientists are atheists - Including Higgs (whom the Higgs boson is named after)..
If one of them ever came to covers - their head would explode.
Do you even understand the explanation of the Higgs boson? Watch this 7 minute animated video. Then try to explain why god or jesus or abraham never told us about quarks or photons or even atoms in the bible.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HoldEm00:
And back to the original topic of this thread.
This could be the how, and not the why.
but we all know that you think theres no way God exists................ but lets discuss parallel universes and time travel.............. what a quack job.
If you really believe time travel ( excuse me ) could happen........... then why hasnt someone from the future ever come back to tell us anything...... gotta be at least one rogue time traveler out there.
Seriously you make fun of me for my belief( dont know why you get your jollies off that)........ but then post a link to topics of time travel and parallel universes.........QUACK JOB!
97% of nobel scientists are atheists - Including Higgs (whom the Higgs boson is named after)..
If one of them ever came to covers - their head would explode.
Do you even understand the explanation of the Higgs boson? Watch this 7 minute animated video. Then try to explain why god or jesus or abraham never told us about quarks or photons or even atoms in the bible.
And BTW - time travel and parallel universes are much more believable than Noahs Ark, Abraham living 700+ years, walking on water, resurrecting from the dead, and Adam and Eve.
Not even close.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
And BTW - time travel and parallel universes are much more believable than Noahs Ark, Abraham living 700+ years, walking on water, resurrecting from the dead, and Adam and Eve.
Your out there telling me that Time travel and Parallel Universes might exist......... but no way in the world God exists.
I do think for myself CR .......... why are you always the first to bash Christians on this site also?
Why cant you just let it be......... DO YOU HONESTLY THINK YOUR CONVINCING ANYONE?????????????
no where in my threads did i ever say god does not exist..........you have trouble comprehending......get somone to read the messages to you...it may help you understand....
Michio is talking about the mind of god.....of course it is not your racist mysogynistic god that Michoi, Eistein and myself are refering too. no our god does not say "do not kill" except when i tell you too.......our god does not have crazy stories about 2 of every species on an ark because he got mad and decided to flood the world.. or the one that said the sun goes around the earth and the earth is flat.....do not pray in public .......you know all the nonsense......no we believe in a deist god......agnostics, freethinkers, and atheists welcome
0
Quote Originally Posted by HoldEm00:
Your out there telling me that Time travel and Parallel Universes might exist......... but no way in the world God exists.
I do think for myself CR .......... why are you always the first to bash Christians on this site also?
Why cant you just let it be......... DO YOU HONESTLY THINK YOUR CONVINCING ANYONE?????????????
no where in my threads did i ever say god does not exist..........you have trouble comprehending......get somone to read the messages to you...it may help you understand....
Michio is talking about the mind of god.....of course it is not your racist mysogynistic god that Michoi, Eistein and myself are refering too. no our god does not say "do not kill" except when i tell you too.......our god does not have crazy stories about 2 of every species on an ark because he got mad and decided to flood the world.. or the one that said the sun goes around the earth and the earth is flat.....do not pray in public .......you know all the nonsense......no we believe in a deist god......agnostics, freethinkers, and atheists welcome
lotta people happy to go to hell for eternity in here it seems.
hope you realize your errors before its too late guys
On a side note...... What if i was wrong and there is no God, no Heaven or no Hell( but i know there is)............ Oh well big deal, no foul on my part, i'll be dead just like yous.......
But if im right........ you guys will realize its too late.
If everyone were Christian and followed the Ten Commandments, this world would be a better place.
But you guys keep on bashing people for no reason .... good times
And CR......... with your little brain comment......... Its fact that my IQ is higher than yours
Are snake handlers true believers and of higher iq?
0
Quote Originally Posted by HoldEm00:
lotta people happy to go to hell for eternity in here it seems.
hope you realize your errors before its too late guys
On a side note...... What if i was wrong and there is no God, no Heaven or no Hell( but i know there is)............ Oh well big deal, no foul on my part, i'll be dead just like yous.......
But if im right........ you guys will realize its too late.
If everyone were Christian and followed the Ten Commandments, this world would be a better place.
But you guys keep on bashing people for no reason .... good times
And CR......... with your little brain comment......... Its fact that my IQ is higher than yours
Are snake handlers true believers and of higher iq?
while going back in time to play the lottery might not be possible, "time travel" in principle is certainly very real...but it depends how you want to define it. Through what we understand about space-time, you can in theory travel "backwards" through someone else's perception of time [or forwards through your own, of course]. Time is relative. Without getting overly complicated about it; as velocity and gravity increase, time slows down. An astronaut that spends a year on the ISS, would return to earth around 0.015s younger than their earth counterparts.... shit, even a climber on the highest mountain on earth technically experiences (an extremely tiny amount of) time dilation, in comparison to someone at sea level because of the discrepancies in gravity at the two locations...
If we could travel closer to light speed and obv, much greater distances, it would be possible to create larger discrepancies and would have a more dramatic effect. If you were to travel around the milky way at near-lightspeed, you could spend say 15years in transit, but upon your return, its likely that all of your friends and loved ones would be long dead, as for them 200+ years have passed......shit, you'd better hope that the earth is still there when you return.
were not anywhere close to traveling even remotely close to light speed, and without turning this into a politics thread, it is theoretically possible that the reason noone has traveled back from the future is because we are considerably closer to creating our own mass extinction event, than we are to developing means of high speed space travel.
Savy?
0
while going back in time to play the lottery might not be possible, "time travel" in principle is certainly very real...but it depends how you want to define it. Through what we understand about space-time, you can in theory travel "backwards" through someone else's perception of time [or forwards through your own, of course]. Time is relative. Without getting overly complicated about it; as velocity and gravity increase, time slows down. An astronaut that spends a year on the ISS, would return to earth around 0.015s younger than their earth counterparts.... shit, even a climber on the highest mountain on earth technically experiences (an extremely tiny amount of) time dilation, in comparison to someone at sea level because of the discrepancies in gravity at the two locations...
If we could travel closer to light speed and obv, much greater distances, it would be possible to create larger discrepancies and would have a more dramatic effect. If you were to travel around the milky way at near-lightspeed, you could spend say 15years in transit, but upon your return, its likely that all of your friends and loved ones would be long dead, as for them 200+ years have passed......shit, you'd better hope that the earth is still there when you return.
were not anywhere close to traveling even remotely close to light speed, and without turning this into a politics thread, it is theoretically possible that the reason noone has traveled back from the future is because we are considerably closer to creating our own mass extinction event, than we are to developing means of high speed space travel.
while going back in time to play the lottery might not be possible, "time travel" in principle is certainly very real...but it depends how you want to define it. Through what we understand about space-time, you can in theory travel "backwards" through someone else's perception of time [or forwards through your own, of course]. Time is relative. Without getting overly complicated about it; as velocity and gravity increase, time slows down. An astronaut that spends a year on the ISS, would return to earth around 0.015s younger than their earth counterparts.... shit, even a climber on the highest mountain on earth technically experiences (an extremely tiny amount of) time dilation, in comparison to someone at sea level because of the discrepancies in gravity at the two locations...
If we could travel closer to light speed and obv, much greater distances, it would be possible to create larger discrepancies and would have a more dramatic effect. If you were to travel around the milky way at near-lightspeed, you could spend say 15years in transit, but upon your return, its likely that all of your friends and loved ones would be long dead, as for them 200+ years have passed......shit, you'd better hope that the earth is still there when you return.
were not anywhere close to traveling even remotely close to light speed, and without turning this into a politics thread, it is theoretically possible that the reason noone has traveled back from the future is because we are considerably closer to creating our own mass extinction event, than we are to developing means of high speed space travel.
Savy?
I wonder if anyone watched one of the specials on either the science channel or history 2 or one of those types on the 7 biggest threats to our existence. It was pretty informative. Basically, best case scenario, we make it another few thousand years...maybe we get to 10,000, but even that is highly unlikely. Even if we don't destroy ourselves, there's gonna be some sort of extinction level natural disaster within the next few thousand years like a super volcano creating an coat of ash on the ozone layer, effectively a nuclear winter...or an asteroid blowing us to bits. Highly unlikely that it happens in our lifetime, but future generations may not be so lucky.
0
Quote Originally Posted by switchwalk:
while going back in time to play the lottery might not be possible, "time travel" in principle is certainly very real...but it depends how you want to define it. Through what we understand about space-time, you can in theory travel "backwards" through someone else's perception of time [or forwards through your own, of course]. Time is relative. Without getting overly complicated about it; as velocity and gravity increase, time slows down. An astronaut that spends a year on the ISS, would return to earth around 0.015s younger than their earth counterparts.... shit, even a climber on the highest mountain on earth technically experiences (an extremely tiny amount of) time dilation, in comparison to someone at sea level because of the discrepancies in gravity at the two locations...
If we could travel closer to light speed and obv, much greater distances, it would be possible to create larger discrepancies and would have a more dramatic effect. If you were to travel around the milky way at near-lightspeed, you could spend say 15years in transit, but upon your return, its likely that all of your friends and loved ones would be long dead, as for them 200+ years have passed......shit, you'd better hope that the earth is still there when you return.
were not anywhere close to traveling even remotely close to light speed, and without turning this into a politics thread, it is theoretically possible that the reason noone has traveled back from the future is because we are considerably closer to creating our own mass extinction event, than we are to developing means of high speed space travel.
Savy?
I wonder if anyone watched one of the specials on either the science channel or history 2 or one of those types on the 7 biggest threats to our existence. It was pretty informative. Basically, best case scenario, we make it another few thousand years...maybe we get to 10,000, but even that is highly unlikely. Even if we don't destroy ourselves, there's gonna be some sort of extinction level natural disaster within the next few thousand years like a super volcano creating an coat of ash on the ozone layer, effectively a nuclear winter...or an asteroid blowing us to bits. Highly unlikely that it happens in our lifetime, but future generations may not be so lucky.
This is basically proof that God does not exist. Sorry to smash your dreams, but no one is waiting for you in heaven, because it's not there. But feel free to open another page to something like tubegalore and jerk off in splendor - there is no guardian angel watching over your shoulder in horror as you can now masterbate guilt free -- because you have been spoon fed lies and a crock of shit since before you gave up on Santa as a tike.
It's true, it's true.
0
This is basically proof that God does not exist. Sorry to smash your dreams, but no one is waiting for you in heaven, because it's not there. But feel free to open another page to something like tubegalore and jerk off in splendor - there is no guardian angel watching over your shoulder in horror as you can now masterbate guilt free -- because you have been spoon fed lies and a crock of shit since before you gave up on Santa as a tike.
regardless of whatever pot you are trying to stir, if there is intelligent life out there, they would look upon us in the same way we look down upon chimpanzees.
person sapiens share a 97+% genetic match with Chimpanzees. Look at the incredible difference between our species, and look at the feats our species: Weve created tall sky scrapers, multiple languages, a complex understanding of naturally occurring mathematical principles, weve created multi-ton steel birds to transport people across the globe, and shit weve even left our planet several times and landed a handful of objects on other planets! In comparison with chimps, who we have taught sign language and basic math, there lies a less than 3% discrepancy in our genetic makeup.
With what we have accomplished over a species that we share 97% of the same DNA, we look down at them and remark "oh how quaint, it knows 2+2 is 4". Imagine now a complex alien life form, capable of long distance space travel. Imagine how the alien lifeforms would view us; weve only (relatively) recently sent a probe beyond out own solar system. Their math and physics comprehension they would learn as infants in their society, would be vastly superior to our deepest understanding of the universe from our top minds.
Put simply they would remark "oh look, how quaint, it knows of Quarks". Then they would carry on to explore a far more interesting and intelligent planet. They certainly would know better than to try and make nice with a society hell bent on its own destruction.
0
both may be true, just one, or neither.
regardless of whatever pot you are trying to stir, if there is intelligent life out there, they would look upon us in the same way we look down upon chimpanzees.
person sapiens share a 97+% genetic match with Chimpanzees. Look at the incredible difference between our species, and look at the feats our species: Weve created tall sky scrapers, multiple languages, a complex understanding of naturally occurring mathematical principles, weve created multi-ton steel birds to transport people across the globe, and shit weve even left our planet several times and landed a handful of objects on other planets! In comparison with chimps, who we have taught sign language and basic math, there lies a less than 3% discrepancy in our genetic makeup.
With what we have accomplished over a species that we share 97% of the same DNA, we look down at them and remark "oh how quaint, it knows 2+2 is 4". Imagine now a complex alien life form, capable of long distance space travel. Imagine how the alien lifeforms would view us; weve only (relatively) recently sent a probe beyond out own solar system. Their math and physics comprehension they would learn as infants in their society, would be vastly superior to our deepest understanding of the universe from our top minds.
Put simply they would remark "oh look, how quaint, it knows of Quarks". Then they would carry on to explore a far more interesting and intelligent planet. They certainly would know better than to try and make nice with a society hell bent on its own destruction.
The only way that I can relate with time travel being at all possible is when you look at a star that is 10 light years away and it burns out and no longer exists, you don't see it disappear for 10 years.
thats not time travel per se but simple the incredible distance that light has to travel to reach us.
A more relatable and chilling stat is: If nuclear fusion suddenly stopped in our own sun, it would take a full 8 mins until we realized what has occurred.
It makes me think of one of my favourite quotes from Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, when asked what he would do if an alien life form offered him a one way trip to anywhere in the universe:
"I'd visit a civilization on a galaxy 65 million light years away. Assuming I can get there instantaneously, I would look back to Earth with their presumably super telescopes and witness the extinction of the dinosaurs - the light of which is just now reach them."
There still exisits light, somewhere in this universe of every past moment, and in theory it would be possible to look back in time at an event in any region of the universe. Absolutely chilling...... To me at least....
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
The only way that I can relate with time travel being at all possible is when you look at a star that is 10 light years away and it burns out and no longer exists, you don't see it disappear for 10 years.
thats not time travel per se but simple the incredible distance that light has to travel to reach us.
A more relatable and chilling stat is: If nuclear fusion suddenly stopped in our own sun, it would take a full 8 mins until we realized what has occurred.
It makes me think of one of my favourite quotes from Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, when asked what he would do if an alien life form offered him a one way trip to anywhere in the universe:
"I'd visit a civilization on a galaxy 65 million light years away. Assuming I can get there instantaneously, I would look back to Earth with their presumably super telescopes and witness the extinction of the dinosaurs - the light of which is just now reach them."
There still exisits light, somewhere in this universe of every past moment, and in theory it would be possible to look back in time at an event in any region of the universe. Absolutely chilling...... To me at least....
This is basically proof that God does not exist. Sorry to smash your dreams, but no one is waiting for you in heaven, because it's not there. But feel free to open another page to something like tubegalore and jerk off in splendor - there is no guardian angel watching over your shoulder in horror as you can now masterbate guilt free -- because you have been spoon fed lies and a crock of shit since before you gave up on Santa as a tike.
It's true, it's true.
thats neither nice, nor true.
the existence of a Higgs Boson particle does not rule out the possibility of "god". Its an extremely important discovery for physics' sake, but it does not explicitly disprove the existence of any sort of higher being.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rated91:
This is basically proof that God does not exist. Sorry to smash your dreams, but no one is waiting for you in heaven, because it's not there. But feel free to open another page to something like tubegalore and jerk off in splendor - there is no guardian angel watching over your shoulder in horror as you can now masterbate guilt free -- because you have been spoon fed lies and a crock of shit since before you gave up on Santa as a tike.
It's true, it's true.
thats neither nice, nor true.
the existence of a Higgs Boson particle does not rule out the possibility of "god". Its an extremely important discovery for physics' sake, but it does not explicitly disprove the existence of any sort of higher being.
rated91 -- you are dead wrong that this is proof that God does not exist. All this discovery does is help explain how matter gained mass in the moments following the Big Bang.
0
switchwalk knows what he is talking about
rated91 -- you are dead wrong that this is proof that God does not exist. All this discovery does is help explain how matter gained mass in the moments following the Big Bang.
rated91 -- you are dead wrong that this is proof that God does not exist. All this discovery does is help explain how matter gained mass in the moments following the Big Bang.
OK fine. But lets be serious here. It does go a long way to disproving the CHRISTIAN / JUDAIC / MUSLIM god. Science has basically withered away the biblical story to rubbish.
Why doesnt Jesus talk about quarks? Or "On the first day, god created a massive explosion and a particle that gives other particles mass."
If you want to believe in a higher power - or god - that is pretty much not provable. But if you want to tell me that the christian god, as described in the bible - did things literally as they were done in the bible - I would say that science has all but disproved that a long time ago.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
switchwalk knows what he is talking about
rated91 -- you are dead wrong that this is proof that God does not exist. All this discovery does is help explain how matter gained mass in the moments following the Big Bang.
OK fine. But lets be serious here. It does go a long way to disproving the CHRISTIAN / JUDAIC / MUSLIM god. Science has basically withered away the biblical story to rubbish.
Why doesnt Jesus talk about quarks? Or "On the first day, god created a massive explosion and a particle that gives other particles mass."
If you want to believe in a higher power - or god - that is pretty much not provable. But if you want to tell me that the christian god, as described in the bible - did things literally as they were done in the bible - I would say that science has all but disproved that a long time ago.
OK fine. But lets be serious here. It does go a long way to disproving the CHRISTIAN / JUDAIC / MUSLIM god. Science has basically withered away the biblical story to rubbish.
Why doesnt Jesus talk about quarks? Or "On the first day, god created a massive explosion and a particle that gives other particles mass."
If you want to believe in a higher power - or god - that is pretty much not provable. But if you want to tell me that the christian god, as described in the bible - did things literally as they were done in the bible - I would say that science has all but disproved that a long time ago.
I would agree that a literal interpretation of "God" as known in Judeo-Christianity is likely ruled out by the science, without a doubt. I think we both know though Van that it doesn't rule out in any way the existence of a higher power of sorts that either (a) set this universe into motion or (b) created the laws of reality that govern our interactions with the universe.
On a side note, I've started reading a book on quantum mechanics the last week or so. Absolutely mind blowing stuff. You need a pretty solid background in the subject from a layperson perspective for the book to make sense, but it is excellent and has really caused me to examine some very troubling questions in the world of science.
0
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
OK fine. But lets be serious here. It does go a long way to disproving the CHRISTIAN / JUDAIC / MUSLIM god. Science has basically withered away the biblical story to rubbish.
Why doesnt Jesus talk about quarks? Or "On the first day, god created a massive explosion and a particle that gives other particles mass."
If you want to believe in a higher power - or god - that is pretty much not provable. But if you want to tell me that the christian god, as described in the bible - did things literally as they were done in the bible - I would say that science has all but disproved that a long time ago.
I would agree that a literal interpretation of "God" as known in Judeo-Christianity is likely ruled out by the science, without a doubt. I think we both know though Van that it doesn't rule out in any way the existence of a higher power of sorts that either (a) set this universe into motion or (b) created the laws of reality that govern our interactions with the universe.
On a side note, I've started reading a book on quantum mechanics the last week or so. Absolutely mind blowing stuff. You need a pretty solid background in the subject from a layperson perspective for the book to make sense, but it is excellent and has really caused me to examine some very troubling questions in the world of science.
Christians could believe in the big bang theory. .......... God spoke, and BANG it happened.
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Could this not be how?
oh it couldnt huh? just cause!
NAME ONE THING THAT SCIENCE HAS DISPROVEN IN THE BIBLE! Know GOD is not of this world.......... he doesnt have to play by humans rules...... HE CREATED US, AND IT WAS WONDERFUL
i just fail to see how this goes a long way to disproving the only God, the Christian God.
Islam shouldnt even be a religion anyways.......... so i guess your right on that note of there not being a Muslim god..... no real religion praises a man who killed 100's of thousands and was A HUGE PRACTICING PEDOFILE, WHO MARRIED 6-Year Olds So please dont even mention God along with that slime of a class of people
0
just going in circles vanzack
Christians could believe in the big bang theory. .......... God spoke, and BANG it happened.
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Could this not be how?
oh it couldnt huh? just cause!
NAME ONE THING THAT SCIENCE HAS DISPROVEN IN THE BIBLE! Know GOD is not of this world.......... he doesnt have to play by humans rules...... HE CREATED US, AND IT WAS WONDERFUL
i just fail to see how this goes a long way to disproving the only God, the Christian God.
Islam shouldnt even be a religion anyways.......... so i guess your right on that note of there not being a Muslim god..... no real religion praises a man who killed 100's of thousands and was A HUGE PRACTICING PEDOFILE, WHO MARRIED 6-Year Olds So please dont even mention God along with that slime of a class of people
And BTW - time travel and parallel universes are much more believable than Noahs Ark, Abraham living 700+ years, walking on water, resurrecting from the dead, and Adam and Eve.
Not even close.
I disagree but you have very good points regardless. I am a Christian but not close minded on some of this stuff.
One thing you cannot argue is the Bible is the best and most accurate history book in the world. Even atheist history professors do a lot of teaching out of the Bible.
0
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
And BTW - time travel and parallel universes are much more believable than Noahs Ark, Abraham living 700+ years, walking on water, resurrecting from the dead, and Adam and Eve.
Not even close.
I disagree but you have very good points regardless. I am a Christian but not close minded on some of this stuff.
One thing you cannot argue is the Bible is the best and most accurate history book in the world. Even atheist history professors do a lot of teaching out of the Bible.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.