Appalachian St over 138 App. plays a fast pace of ball and will control tempo at home. Both D's are bad and the last meeting this year went for 70 in the FH and 89 in the second. Can we get two 70 halves?
Citadel under 128 Last meeting went for 51 FH and 59 SH. Close game and both teams shot decent. The pace will be snailish with these two slow teams.
Washington over 141 Washington scored 68 @WSU. I think they can put up a 70 spot on Arizona. Arizona plays a lot slower style but I think they will get caught up in this possible foul fest.
Minnesota over 125 Both of these teams avg. around 70 a game. I think we can get at least 60 from both. Should be a close one with lots of foul shots towards the end.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Some early leans that kind of stuck out to me.
Appalachian St over 138 App. plays a fast pace of ball and will control tempo at home. Both D's are bad and the last meeting this year went for 70 in the FH and 89 in the second. Can we get two 70 halves?
Citadel under 128 Last meeting went for 51 FH and 59 SH. Close game and both teams shot decent. The pace will be snailish with these two slow teams.
Washington over 141 Washington scored 68 @WSU. I think they can put up a 70 spot on Arizona. Arizona plays a lot slower style but I think they will get caught up in this possible foul fest.
Minnesota over 125 Both of these teams avg. around 70 a game. I think we can get at least 60 from both. Should be a close one with lots of foul shots towards the end.
dude i wish i had a teacher like you. although i distinctly remember the assistant principal of our middle school explaining to us at recess in seventh grade what "the spread" means.
0
kgc = the machine = nc ninja
dude i wish i had a teacher like you. although i distinctly remember the assistant principal of our middle school explaining to us at recess in seventh grade what "the spread" means.
UPDATED RECORD WITH MIZZOU PENDING. Thanks guys That's funny about the VP. I knew what the spread was when my dad and I used to bet on the March Madness back in '87 (I was 7....lol) LOVE YA DAD
Pittsburgh Pens +130 Regulation Line 1.7 units
NCAA South Carolina -5 St Bonnie under 146 Pitt under 136 Fla over 134 Temple over 146
Mizzou over 153
232-157 NCAAB '08-09 (115-69o/u's) 65-57 NHL '08-09 +15.91 units(most bets 1-2 U's) 40-25 NFL '08-09 41-35 NCAAF '08-09 61-54 NBA '08-09 104-48 NBA '07-08
142-93 NCAAB '07-08
83-68 MLB '07-08
0
UPDATED RECORD WITH MIZZOU PENDING. Thanks guys That's funny about the VP. I knew what the spread was when my dad and I used to bet on the March Madness back in '87 (I was 7....lol) LOVE YA DAD
Pittsburgh Pens +130 Regulation Line 1.7 units
NCAA South Carolina -5 St Bonnie under 146 Pitt under 136 Fla over 134 Temple over 146
Mizzou over 153
232-157 NCAAB '08-09 (115-69o/u's) 65-57 NHL '08-09 +15.91 units(most bets 1-2 U's) 40-25 NFL '08-09 41-35 NCAAF '08-09 61-54 NBA '08-09 104-48 NBA '07-08
KGC -- one thing to keep in mind on the Washington game is that they are one of the best rebounding teams in the Pac-10. If they can keep Hill off the glass with Brockman, no one on Arizona should be able to board with them. That could mean a lot of offensive boards for Washington and/or very few second chance point opportunities for Arizona.
I'm lean heavy initially on Washington tomorrow, but we'll see how that shakes out upon further study
0
KGC -- one thing to keep in mind on the Washington game is that they are one of the best rebounding teams in the Pac-10. If they can keep Hill off the glass with Brockman, no one on Arizona should be able to board with them. That could mean a lot of offensive boards for Washington and/or very few second chance point opportunities for Arizona.
I'm lean heavy initially on Washington tomorrow, but we'll see how that shakes out upon further study
KGC -- one thing to keep in mind on the Washington game is that they are one of the best rebounding teams in the Pac-10. If they can keep Hill off the glass with Brockman, no one on Arizona should be able to board with them. That could mean a lot of offensive boards for Washington and/or very few second chance point opportunities for Arizona.
I'm lean heavy initially on Washington tomorrow, but we'll see how that shakes out upon further study
Yea I hear ya. I like Wash to but am going to stick with this total for now. Yea it has been great lately. Increasing that betting for Vegas
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
KGC -- one thing to keep in mind on the Washington game is that they are one of the best rebounding teams in the Pac-10. If they can keep Hill off the glass with Brockman, no one on Arizona should be able to board with them. That could mean a lot of offensive boards for Washington and/or very few second chance point opportunities for Arizona.
I'm lean heavy initially on Washington tomorrow, but we'll see how that shakes out upon further study
Yea I hear ya. I like Wash to but am going to stick with this total for now. Yea it has been great lately. Increasing that betting for Vegas
Appalachian St over 138 App. plays a fast pace of ball and will control tempo at home. Both D's are bad and the last meeting this year went for 70 in the FH and 89 in the second. Can we get two 70 halves?
Citadel under 128 Last meeting went for 51 FH and 59 SH. Close game and both teams shot decent. The pace will be snailish with these two slow teams.
Washington over 141 Washington scored 68 @WSU. I think they can put up a 70 spot on Arizona. Arizona plays a lot slower style but I think they will get caught up in this possible foul fest.
Minnesota over 125 Both of these teams avg. around 70 a game. I think we can get at least 60 from both. Should be a close one with lots of foul shots towards the end.
That Washington Over caught my eye as well.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kindergartencapper:
Some early leans that kind of stuck out to me.
Appalachian St over 138 App. plays a fast pace of ball and will control tempo at home. Both D's are bad and the last meeting this year went for 70 in the FH and 89 in the second. Can we get two 70 halves?
Citadel under 128 Last meeting went for 51 FH and 59 SH. Close game and both teams shot decent. The pace will be snailish with these two slow teams.
Washington over 141 Washington scored 68 @WSU. I think they can put up a 70 spot on Arizona. Arizona plays a lot slower style but I think they will get caught up in this possible foul fest.
Minnesota over 125 Both of these teams avg. around 70 a game. I think we can get at least 60 from both. Should be a close one with lots of foul shots towards the end.
KGC -- one thing to keep in mind on the Washington game is that they are one of the best rebounding teams in the Pac-10. If they can keep Hill off the glass with Brockman, no one on Arizona should be able to board with them. That could mean a lot of offensive boards for Washington and/or very few second chance point opportunities for Arizona.
I'm lean heavy initially on Washington tomorrow, but we'll see how that shakes out upon further study
who's gonna rebound other than Brockman? I'm not sure he can get all the boards so who do you think can really box out Jamelle Horne and Chase Buddinger all night long? The English dude can't because then again box outs may not even matter with how high Buddinger jumps
...sorry to clutter your thread, KGC, but i really like Arizona tomorrow and i'm hoping people can talk me off the 'Cats as i think it's a perfect spot
good luck tomorrow buddy, glad to see you getting hott
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
KGC -- one thing to keep in mind on the Washington game is that they are one of the best rebounding teams in the Pac-10. If they can keep Hill off the glass with Brockman, no one on Arizona should be able to board with them. That could mean a lot of offensive boards for Washington and/or very few second chance point opportunities for Arizona.
I'm lean heavy initially on Washington tomorrow, but we'll see how that shakes out upon further study
who's gonna rebound other than Brockman? I'm not sure he can get all the boards so who do you think can really box out Jamelle Horne and Chase Buddinger all night long? The English dude can't because then again box outs may not even matter with how high Buddinger jumps
...sorry to clutter your thread, KGC, but i really like Arizona tomorrow and i'm hoping people can talk me off the 'Cats as i think it's a perfect spot
good luck tomorrow buddy, glad to see you getting hott
i like wash, but i like that over more...might have to tail your wash an minn totals...I am in the same employment field buddy...damn kids lol!
I cannot back zona personally...its either wash or a no play as I do not like to bet on bad and inconsistant teams...i think the players have tuned out the coaches and are playing for themselves...a top tier pac 10 team v a bottom tier pac 10 team...wash wins the pg battle as well...hill could be an all american but is not...poor chase, all he wanted to do was to play for lute and lute screwed him 2 years in a row...If houston wasnt a bunch of idiots, they would have won at zona...what will wash do there???
0
i like wash, but i like that over more...might have to tail your wash an minn totals...I am in the same employment field buddy...damn kids lol!
I cannot back zona personally...its either wash or a no play as I do not like to bet on bad and inconsistant teams...i think the players have tuned out the coaches and are playing for themselves...a top tier pac 10 team v a bottom tier pac 10 team...wash wins the pg battle as well...hill could be an all american but is not...poor chase, all he wanted to do was to play for lute and lute screwed him 2 years in a row...If houston wasnt a bunch of idiots, they would have won at zona...what will wash do there???
KgCapper you are red hot hitting all 6 picks yesterday.
I can't seem to get a good book for the o/u plays on college hoops. my current book only gives out a handful of o/u options. for instance 5 out of 30 games.
please advise.
0
KgCapper you are red hot hitting all 6 picks yesterday.
I can't seem to get a good book for the o/u plays on college hoops. my current book only gives out a handful of o/u options. for instance 5 out of 30 games.
KGC --wow,,sizzlin man , lookin good from here in Raleigh - have you decided on your Vegas locale yet - I'm a big fan of the golden nugget downtown, Orleans has good value to offer off strip - will probaly tail you on all 3 of your total plays at 50 a pop ,,lets get that cheddar--nice write up also
0
KGC --wow,,sizzlin man , lookin good from here in Raleigh - have you decided on your Vegas locale yet - I'm a big fan of the golden nugget downtown, Orleans has good value to offer off strip - will probaly tail you on all 3 of your total plays at 50 a pop ,,lets get that cheddar--nice write up also
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.