I read a tweet last week from covers.com that said the unders were hitting 70% of the time when two teams play each other that both played the night before. Since then, I have played every game in this situation and have gone 7-3 (70%).
Wed 2/15:
Spurs/Raptors under 186 113-106 LOSS
Kings/Knicks under 200 100-85 WIN
Thunder/Rockets under 201 96-95 WIN
Suns/Hawks under 186 101-99 LOSS
Thurs 2/16:
Nets/Pacers under 195 93-88 WIN
Sat 2/18:
Warriors/Grizzlies under 196 104-103 LOSS
Mon 2/20:
Nets/Knicks under 196 100-92 WIN
Celtics/Mavs under 177 89-73 WIN
Magic/Bucks under 187 93-90 WIN
Wolves/Nuggets under 210 103-101 WIN
Tonight's system play will be Spurs/Blazers under. I will post the number I get when I make the play.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I read a tweet last week from covers.com that said the unders were hitting 70% of the time when two teams play each other that both played the night before. Since then, I have played every game in this situation and have gone 7-3 (70%).
Wed 2/15:
Spurs/Raptors under 186 113-106 LOSS
Kings/Knicks under 200 100-85 WIN
Thunder/Rockets under 201 96-95 WIN
Suns/Hawks under 186 101-99 LOSS
Thurs 2/16:
Nets/Pacers under 195 93-88 WIN
Sat 2/18:
Warriors/Grizzlies under 196 104-103 LOSS
Mon 2/20:
Nets/Knicks under 196 100-92 WIN
Celtics/Mavs under 177 89-73 WIN
Magic/Bucks under 187 93-90 WIN
Wolves/Nuggets under 210 103-101 WIN
Tonight's system play will be Spurs/Blazers under. I will post the number I get when I make the play.
I like this. 192.5 for the Spurs game tonight sounds like a lot. Which one of these teams is going to score 100? And the other is going to score 93? Come on.
0
I like this. 192.5 for the Spurs game tonight sounds like a lot. Which one of these teams is going to score 100? And the other is going to score 93? Come on.
Interesting how that tweet comes out and then you play the first game in that situation and it goes 50 points over
If you read my first post, that was not the first game I played in that situation. That was just the first play that I posted. I played 10 games before that one and went 7-3.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PureButta:
Interesting how that tweet comes out and then you play the first game in that situation and it goes 50 points over
If you read my first post, that was not the first game I played in that situation. That was just the first play that I posted. I played 10 games before that one and went 7-3.
Is it possible that ALL unders were coming at a greater rate in the first half and now teams are coming into their roles/players and the bookmakers also read that tweet and are making totals reflect the way teams are forced to play in this shortened season?
0
Is it possible that ALL unders were coming at a greater rate in the first half and now teams are coming into their roles/players and the bookmakers also read that tweet and are making totals reflect the way teams are forced to play in this shortened season?
Is it possible that ALL unders were coming at a greater rate in the first half and now teams are coming into their roles/players and the bookmakers also read that tweet and are making totals reflect the way teams are forced to play in this shortened season?
No, and I'm agreeing with CalifDreamin on that line being the most dumbest/hilarious line ever
0
Quote Originally Posted by 666LES:
Is it possible that ALL unders were coming at a greater rate in the first half and now teams are coming into their roles/players and the bookmakers also read that tweet and are making totals reflect the way teams are forced to play in this shortened season?
No, and I'm agreeing with CalifDreamin on that line being the most dumbest/hilarious line ever
There is a variation of that system that was hitting at an eye popping 82% (38-8) through Feb 6. UNDER when both teams back to back AND total is 190 or greater.
Still hitting. Lakers/Thunder UNDER
Great info jailbreak
It seems like the unders in the 180's are the ones that have been given me the most trouble since I started paying attention to this.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jailbreak1281:
There is a variation of that system that was hitting at an eye popping 82% (38-8) through Feb 6. UNDER when both teams back to back AND total is 190 or greater.
Still hitting. Lakers/Thunder UNDER
Great info jailbreak
It seems like the unders in the 180's are the ones that have been given me the most trouble since I started paying attention to this.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.