| Author: |
[Systems & Strategies] Topic: The 'Yes' or 'No' strategy |
|
Trigg |
RSI   View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#1 Posted: 4/9/2011 4:50:21 PM Just using this Covers thread for record keeping. Feel free to take a gander. Basically just betting 'yes' or 'no' on first inning RS if the odds are +100 and up. Also, I'm ALWAYS only using a maximum 5% of my bankroll on every bet. ALWAYS. Self-discipline and money management is key in sports betting. You win some, and you lose some, ALWAYS. I'm not chasing, just straight bets. 9 plays this evening. Texas @ Baltimore (yes) +101 Oakland @ Minnesota (yes) +111 Cleveland @ Seattle (yes) +111 Florida @ Houston (yes) +101 Chicago @ Milwaukee (yes) +107 Washington @ New York (yes) +107 Cincinnati @ Arizona (yes) +101 Los Angeles @ San Diego (yes) +116 St. Louis @ San Francisco (yes) +122
|
|
quote |
|
sabia |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: WagerWeb.com | |
All-Star
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 10337
Location: Mexico |
#2 Posted: 4/9/2011 6:29:32 PM  |
|
quote |
|
020NE |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 37
Location: Florida |
#3 Posted: 4/9/2011 7:12:57 PM
BTW, GL! 
|
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#4 Posted: 4/9/2011 7:54:21 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by 020NE: You mentioned always only using 5% of your bankroll on every bet. Do you consider this as one bet or do you bet 5% on each prop? BTW, GL! 5% on each prop. I know it may not seem like much, but it's more secure and hopefully in the long run, it will mean $$'s especially if there are plenty of wins!. GL to you too, man! |
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#5 Posted: 4/9/2011 10:59:54 PM Texas @ Baltimore (yes) +101  Oakland @ Minnesota (yes) +111  Cleveland @ Seattle (yes) +111 Florida @ Houston (yes) +101 Chicago @ Milwaukee (yes) +107 Washington @ New York (yes) +107 Cincinnati @ Arizona (yes) +101 Los Angeles @ San Diego (yes) +116 St. Louis @ San Francisco (yes) +122
YTD ~ 6-3-0 
|
|
quote |
|
|
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#6 Posted: 4/9/2011 11:01:28 PM  |
|
quote |
|
Snappa |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes | |
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 289
Location: California |
#7 Posted: 4/10/2011 12:45:13 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by Trigg: Just using this Covers thread for record keeping. Feel free to take a gander. Basically just betting 'yes' or 'no' on first inning RS if the odds are +100 and up. Also, I'm ALWAYS only using a maximum 5% of my bankroll on every bet. ALWAYS. Self-discipline and money management is key in sports betting. You win some, and you lose some, ALWAYS. I'm not chasing, just straight bets. 9 plays this evening. Texas @ Baltimore (yes) +101 Oakland @ Minnesota (yes) +111 Cleveland @ Seattle (yes) +111 Florida @ Houston (yes) +101 Chicago @ Milwaukee (yes) +107 Washington @ New York (yes) +107 Cincinnati @ Arizona (yes) +101 Los Angeles @ San Diego (yes) +116 St. Louis @ San Francisco (yes) +122
Hey, Trigg. First of all best of luck to you this MLB season. I also play the 1st inning score only more like smitler's method. I had good results with it last year and hope to do well again this season. I just want to bring up a point of contention with you concerning your money management methods. Placing 9 wagers at 5% BR per wager translates into risking 45% of your roll in ONE DAY. If you have one bad week, which is entirely possible, your BR will be wiped out, or so small it will be ineffective. I would encourage you to re-evaluate your risk-tolerance and wager appropriately...maybe you have an extremely high tolerance or are just having fun with this, but in most money management discussions I think you would find that wagering even 20% of your entire bankroll in one day would be considered very aggressive and risky, even though that risk may be spread out over 9 events. And I must admit I am a bit conservative on this issue. Anyway, Trigg, I hope you prove me wrong and kick behind with this system!
|
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#8 Posted: 4/10/2011 11:28:42 AM |
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#9 Posted: 4/10/2011 12:00:38 PM
Oakland @ Minnesota (yes) +107 Toronto @ LA Anaheim (yes) +107 Cleveland @ Seattle (yes) +116 Washington @ New York (yes) +107 *Colorado @ Pittsburgh (yes) +111 *Philadelphia @ Atlanta (yes) +107 Florida @ Houston (yes) +101 Chicago @ *Milwaukee (yes) +101 Los Angeles @ San Diego (yes) +111 St. Louis @ San Francisco (yes) +101
*7% (Experiment only).
Home Dogs ATS (Experiment Only. Not Official Plays)
Detroit +120 Minnesota +150 CWS +135 LA Anaheim +105 Seattle +170 NY Mets +135 Atlanta +175 Milwaukee +110 San Diego +160 San Francisco +170
Home Dogs ML (Experiment Only. Not Official Plays)
Pittsburgh +115 Houston +100 Arizona +100 Boston +105
|
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#10 Posted: 4/10/2011 4:32:59 PM Oakland @ Minnesota (yes) +107
Toronto @ LA Anaheim (yes) +107
Cleveland @ Seattle (yes) +116
Washington @ New York (yes) +107
*Colorado @ Pittsburgh (yes) +111
*Philadelphia @ Atlanta (yes) +107
Florida @ Houston (yes) +101
Chicago @ *Milwaukee (yes) +101
Los Angeles @ San Diego (yes) +111
St. Louis @ San Francisco (yes) +101
YTD ~ 13-6-0
|
|
quote |
|
shawnboskie |
RSI  |
Prospect
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 365
Location: Indiana |
#11 Posted: 4/10/2011 8:45:09 PM |
|
quote |
|
smitler |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes | |
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2365
Location: United States |
#12 Posted: 4/10/2011 10:57:25 PM
Real original douchebag.
|
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#13 Posted: 4/10/2011 11:16:49 PM Home Dogs ATS (Experiment Only. Not Official Plays)
Detroit +120
Minnesota +150
CWS +135
LA Anaheim +105
Seattle +170
NY Mets +135
Atlanta +175
Milwaukee +110
San Diego +160
San Francisco +170
YTD ~ 4-6-0 (40%)
Home Dogs ML (Experiment Only. Not Official Plays)
Pittsburgh +115
Houston +100
Arizona +100
Boston +105
YTD ~ 3-1-0 (75%)
|
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#14 Posted: 4/10/2011 11:21:12 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by shawnboskie:
Clev/sea was a yes Trigg
Thanks for pointing that out. I've been conned by my book in that case as it shows as a loss. |
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#15 Posted: 4/10/2011 11:22:28 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by smitler:
Are you shitting me!
Real original douchebag.
  smitler. |
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#16 Posted: 4/10/2011 11:27:22 PM CORRECTION
Oakland @ Minnesota (yes) +107
Toronto @ LA Anaheim (yes) +107
Cleveland @ Seattle (yes) +116
Washington @ New York (yes) +107
*Colorado @ Pittsburgh (yes) +111
*Philadelphia @ Atlanta (yes) +107
Florida @ Houston (yes) +101
Chicago @ *Milwaukee (yes) +101
Los Angeles @ San Diego (yes) +111
St. Louis @ San Francisco (yes) +101
YTD ~ 14-5-0 (74%) |
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#17 Posted: 4/10/2011 11:29:20 PM |
|
quote |
|
blaaze |
RSI |
Banned
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 197
Location: United States |
#18 Posted: 4/11/2011 11:08:35 AM
|
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#19 Posted: 4/11/2011 1:10:38 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by blaaze: Going into smitlers thread (
New Strategy ) and cussing him out just proves to me where you got the idea to play plus money 1st inning plays. Nothing Original here.
Oh I'm sorry, I didn't know this smitler guy is the ONLY person in the whole world of sports betting to have come up with the idea of betting on the yes/no score in the first inning. Of course, all sports books have exactly that prop set up especially for this smitler tit to 'discover' and play and no-one else. The very fact that he just comes into my thread and publically calling me out, unprovoked, says alot of that person. A worthless scumbag and you are not much dissimilar either.
Don't be an behind kisser and a fool. You just make yourself look stupid. Good day.
|
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#20 Posted: 4/11/2011 1:31:50 PM Another day of riches ahead! A Score in 1st Inning: Texas @ Detroit (yes) +107 Oakland @ CWS (yes) +101 Cleveland @ LA Anaheim (yes) +101 Toronto @ Seattle (yes) +122 Colorado @ NY Mets (yes) +101 Chi Cubs @ Houston (yes) +101 Cincinnati @ San Diego (yes) +122 Los Angeles @ San Francisco (yes) +122
Home Dogs ATS: (Experiment Only. Not Official Plays) Boston +125 CWS +160 LA Anaheim +145 Seattle +125 Arizona +190 San Diego +190 San Francisco +195
Home Dogs ML: (Experiment Only. Not Official Plays) Houston +115 Arizona +100
|
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#21 Posted: 4/11/2011 1:41:15 PM
As far as I'm aware, it's not illegal to create a thread, even if it is of a similar style to another. This forum has thousands upon thousands of threads, many of similar topics. Is there a rule somewhere that says it's against that? I think not.
Therefore, if you're going to come in here and give me garbage, you'll get garbage back. No two ways about it. Don't try to be the big guy or an fool and show some respect. If you don't have anything nice to say, then stay the darn out.
Peace.
|
|
quote |
|
xxMARTINIxx |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2500
Location: Florida |
#22 Posted: 4/11/2011 3:32:13 PM |
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#23 Posted: 4/12/2011 1:11:23 AM A Score in 1st Inning: Texas @ Detroit (yes) +107 Oakland @ CWS (yes) +101 Cleveland @ LA Anaheim (yes) +101 Toronto @ Seattle (yes) +122 Colorado @ NY Mets (yes) +101 Chi Cubs @ Houston (yes) +101 Cincinnati @ San Diego (yes) +122 Los Angeles @ San Francisco (yes) +122 4-4 YTD ~ 18-9-0 (67%)
Home Dogs ATS: (Experiment Only. Not Official Plays) Boston +125 CWS +160 LA Anaheim +145 Seattle +125 Arizona +190 San Diego +190 San Francisco +195 (Wow!) 0-7-0 YTD ~ 4-13-0 (24%)
Home Dogs ML: (Experiment Only. Not Official Plays) Houston +115 Arizona +100 0-2-0 YTD ~ 3-3-0 (50%) |
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#24 Posted: 4/12/2011 1:14:22 AM  |
|
quote |
|
Trigg |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1392
Location: United Kingdom |
#25 Posted: 4/12/2011 1:56:10 PM
Tampa Bay @ Boston (yes) +107
Kansas City @ Minnesota (yes) +107
Oakland @ CWS (yes) +111
Cleveland @ LA Anaheim (yes) +116
Toronto @ Seattle (yes) +122
Milwaukee @ Pittsburgh (yes) +107
Philadelphia @ Washington (yes) +101
Colorado @ NY Mets (yes) +111
Florida @ Atlanta (yes) +107
Chi Cubs @ Houston (yes) +107
Cincinnati @ San Diego (yes) +116
Los Angeles @ San Francisco (yes) +122
YTD ~ 18-9-0 (67%)
Dogs ATS:
Milwaukee +140
Philadelphia +120
NY Mets +180
Atlanta +120
Houston +170
St. Louis +105
San Diego +175
San Francisco +130
NYY +110
Boston +115
Minnesota +135
CWS +155
LA Anaheim +125
Toronto +140
YTD ~ 0-0-0 (0%)
Home Dogs ML:
Seattle +110
Pittsburgh +100
Washington +120
Arizona +135
YTD ~ 3-3-0 (50%)
|
|
quote |