Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
cool
|
Asomugha | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Uman: four eyed half blind dog eating mr. softee sucked everyone in jesus christ man. Guy was +500+ dog and everyone is mad at him for getting blisters and not converting their impossible bets against the Greatest of All Time. Have you ever bet tennis before, get a friggin life. No room for this racist BS here
|
GarySanders | 40 |
|
|
Two extreme angles here haha. 1)Chung doesn't suck, and he hasn't gotten an easy draw beating three different seeds, people have been waiting for this performance; and Tennys was playing good ball, beat Thiem and Stan as well. Having said that- I believe Federer still handles him in 4, as he's the GOAT
|
GarySanders | 40 |
|
|
I'm leaning toward Edmund for the value. Very tough match to predict, as Cilic mentals can swing widely. I expect it to be an absolute slugfest. Haven't made a play on it yet, but leaning similar to you. BOL
|
packersbackers | 153 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BendOber: Chung in straight sets!! Fed is too soft chung can capitalized on those sharp corners were fed cant handle!! Guys, come get your +2500 free bet from BendOber. Lol. Seriously, calling the greatest tennis player of all time soft with no apparent reasoning, may be one of the silliest things I've ever seen on this forum. Internet privileges should be revoked. yikes.
|
BendOber | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by rzagza: This kid is the real deal Holyfield. He plays brick wall tennis and has power off both sides. He is insanely impressive. IMO he’s the only guy left in the draw who can truly challenge Roger because of his ability to both extend rallies and finish points. Wasn't I insane for loving Chung over Djok ML +320 tho? hm
|
rzagza | 5 |
|
|
would have been legendary! I pulled small parlay on Tennys and Chung the other day at +135 and +155. Not as epic, but it paid +500, and had both matches straight as well. Moving on to the quarters baby
|
Mancity | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Mancity:
I don't know why, but something tells me Chung wins this and shall be favorite actually |
drjmali | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AUSSIE_COOLER:
Rooting for you chung guys - hes fitter and takes first set - keep it up |
drjmali | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by gcwrestling08:
I think betting against Djokovic is silly, that's my reason. Just because you don't want to lay -385 doesn't mean there is value in +325. Plus, I think you'll find plenty of support on Chung -- public dog. |
drjmali | 38 |
|
|
congrats to those who followed. I was oddly confident in this match, considering the odds. I understand the Novak supporters, but physically, there were questions, like I was saying, and that's what I was taking a chance on. Wasn't counting on Hyeon straight up outplaying the Aussie master, but he did. What an effort to get it in straights. I have also been watching tons of tennis, Chung a lot specifically. Novak would have had to play some of his top tennis to win, and that just wasn't in the cards. On to the Quarters, mates, look forward to see some good plays on here today. Dr.
|
drjmali | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Mancity: Chung superb right now wow yeah about as good of a start as i could ask for. Will be a long match though, Go Hyeon.
|
drjmali | 38 |
|
|
Gentlemen, I agree with ya'll. I know its a tough match, but I have been watching Chung consistently for the last 4-5 months and he is playing some excellent ball, last match was no fluke, by the time the match started Chung was barely a dog to the 4 player in the world. I took Chung small for ML that match, and for this match as well, and that's it for me. I'm willing to take the loss, but I think the value here for Chung is excellent. He's a large favorite to take at least a set, and I think at that point, will depend on Djok fitness, which could be good, may not be. G'luck, boys.
|
drjmali | 38 |
|
|
I think Halep bounces back strong here. She's a beast. The slow courts favor her, she may be sore from a long match, but not really hurt. And being sore tends to go away once the match starts. I don't think terrible value on Osaka, but my feeling is that Halep wins this fairly comfortably
|
Letsgetit45 | 21 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers: Thiem's draw this event is nothing short of a miracle up to this point...considering he should have lost already to Kudla...the kid is blessed to still be here, and this match sets up to be a steamroll for Thiem like 61 62 64...cinderellas this unlikely dont typically make it into the 2nd week, and when their carriage finally turns into a pumpkin, its almost always a steamroll agree with this
|
Kyuss | 29 |
|
|
you could definitely be right about that. I need to see it from Djok to believe he's in grand slam form again. I wouldn't put him anywhere close to Roger/Rafa/Gregor at the moment, but maybe I'm wrong. I think he matched up with Ramos' finesse game really well, but Chung could pose some more problems with his power. Best of luck with your plays.
|
drjmali | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Mancity:
So basically Nole isn't that great old Nole but Oddsmaker give him still that old great odd... and public follows! I don't mind Chung vs not 100% Nole ! |
drjmali | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Mancity:
So basically Nole isn't that great old Nole but Oddsmaker give him still that old great odd... and public follows! I don't mind Chung vs not 100% Nole ! |
drjmali | 38 |
|
|
Heck of a flyer. I like tennys, I had him over Marterer last round, this is a real tough matchup for him- best of luck.
|
Kyuss | 29 |
|
|
I like Fucs a lot, I almost bet him ML vs Querrey, but didn't pull it. He is very solid, however, in this matchup I wouldn't go for ML. Him and Fed actually trained together for a month not too long ago, so Fed knows his game really well, so Fucs won't be catching him offguard at all. Roger too good at the moment for ML, in my opinion.
|
Mancity | 5 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.