David Payne writes for Ben Burns.

Admit it. Pittsburgh and the under were the right sides of the Super Bowl.

That’s not a lot of solace for anyone who played the Steelers -7 and / or under 46.5.

In fact, those tickets are as worthless as the majority of the Super Bowl commercials. (Lame.)

But there shouldn’t be a single “I told you so” from anyone who bet the Cardinals and the over.

Twice, the Steelers were unable to punch it in from inside the Arizona five-yard line.  So much for that hard-nose, physical Pittsburgh brand of football.

On the opening possession, Ben Roethlisberger’s 21-yard completion to Heath Miller set up a first and goal at the Cardinals’ one-yard line. The Steelers settled for a field goal, after a challenge correctly took away Roethlisberger third-down scramble that was initially ruled a touchdown.

It happened again in the third quarter, with the Steelers leading 17-7.
 
A penalty on Arizona’s Adrian Wilson gave Pittsburgh a 1st and goal at the four. Three plays later, Steeler backers had to watch Jeff Reed trot out for a field goal that kept the Cardinals within one score of covering.

But while Steelers backers were grimacing with each goal-line failure, under players were wearing an ear-to-ear grin.

Heading into the fourth quarter, Pittsburgh led 20-7. Larry Fitzgerald had just one catch, and the Steelers appeared to be in protect-the-lead mode on offense.

Clearly, the under was in very good shape.

Eventually, Fitzgerald got loose. In the fourth quarter, the Cardinals began to attack the middle of the field against the Steelers’ two-deep safety defense. (What took so long?)

Fitzgerald caught four passes on Arizona’s 87-yard drive in the fourth quarter. His leaping one-yard touchdown grab capped the drive and made the score 20-14 with 7:33 to play.

Still, at that point, anyone who had the over would have gladly traded. Isn’t that the truest sign of a bad beat, if the eventual winning side would have switched sides with under 10 minutes to go?

Fitzgerald would score again, splitting Pittsburgh’s safeties for a 64-yard go-ahead touchdown with 2:37 to play.
 
That set up Roethlisberger and Santonio Holmes’ heroics. The two hooked up on a six-yard touchdown with 35 seconds left to push the total over.

Possibly the worst part for those who had the under is knowing that it wasn’t Fitzgerald or Holmes that killed them; instead, it was an offensive lineman.

Pittsburgh center Justin Hartwig was flagged for holding in the end zone with 2:58 to play. It negated a first down completion to Holmes that would have put the Steelers in kneel-down mode.

Condolences: To those who bet the Cardinals at +110 to score last in the first half. Arizona scored with 8:34 left in the second quarter. The Cardinals then drove down to the Pittsburgh 2-yard line with 10 seconds left in the half. If Arizona settles for a field goal or doesn’t score at all, Cardinals to score last was a winner … unless James Harrison picks off Kurt Warner and rumbles 100 yards, breaking tackles along the way, and scores a touchdown.

Did you suffer a bad beat on a Super Bowl prop bet? Vent in the comment section below or email David Payne at davidpayne@covers.com.

If you have any feedback or suggestions for our Editorial Team, please contact us at Editorial

            share   SHARE   rss   RSS FEED   email   EMAIL   print   PRINT
Hide All Responses
avatar

Posted by facehead
4 years ago

Actually Az. & Over were the right sides....if you're goal was to win money. I can't believe they even posted this guys article. Az., clearly the better team on this day, outplayed the steelers for most of the game. But sure enough a number of bad calls and the steelers win. I wish people would get over the history factor and just admit that this was an excellent Az. team.
avatar

Posted by 3TB3
4 years ago

Bman2000 "I didnt see their defense on the last drive" #47 francisco didnt see holmes too good either. first on the holmes catch and run to the 5 francisco falls down leaving all that room for holmes to run down the field , then on the td catch with 3 men on him, francisco closest to holmes francisco couldnt hit and force out holmes as he made the catch. even a penalty if called still would place ball on one yardline and steelers had no timeouts left and were having a hard time finishing the deal from inside the 5. maybe cardinals would have been better off if they had sent in fitzgerald to knock down any possible throw aimed at holmes?
avatar

Posted by 3TB3
4 years ago

Vividjohn says: "pitt was the rite side. ariz box weak team. lousysuperbowl team got beat by pats 47-7 philly 48-20 and giants 37-29 in the tail end of their playoff run." cardinals had easily won their division by the time those games were played. --------- "philly had best record but cards got homefiled in playoff due to winning garbage west." eagles lucked in to the playoffs as #6 wildcard by tampa bay AND chicago BOTH losing their last game to football powerhouses oakland and houston. --------- "philly had to fite dallas and giants and redskins." lost twice to washington ---------- "cards there due to weak division and slantd NFL plaof rules to division winners." Cardinals won 9 games in regular season so did eagles. ------------ "u r rite pitt was the rite side" steelers were lucky they even won the game period.
avatar

Posted by Bman2000
4 years ago

Pittsburgh once again has a shamrock up their fools.....It should of been 14-10 going into the half, or worst case 10-7. That play was like hitting the lotto. Zona comes back with under 3 minutes to go, and must of felt like they already won the superbowl and booked tickets to Disney..I didnt see their defense on the last drive......Pitt should of not won that game.......
avatar

Posted by funnyman1117
4 years ago

The right sides were what I had... Arizona and the Under got burned on the under but thats how unders go you win a lot get burned on the rest... Vivid 9-7 or not they got it done when it counted 1/2 there season didnt count cuz they clinched a playoff spot so early... AZ will go further next year than the Steelers
avatar

Posted by Zeus10
4 years ago

Hey Vivid the Cards beat ATL, CAR and PHI in the playoffs. Was that lucky? Who was lucky was the Steelers because they had all the calls in their favor and a freak int by Harrison on the goaline.
avatar

Posted by Zeus10
4 years ago

Who wouldnt take AZ the way they played in the playoffs? They scored more than 30 points in all 3 playoff games! I know Pitt has the #1 defense but guess what Phili had the #2 defense and the Cards still put up more than 30. The over and AZ were easy calls. Pitt fans should thank the refs!
avatar

Posted by tomboy23
4 years ago

sounds like sour grapes to me... right side was az and over.... why??? because it hit.. sorry if u gave out another game of the year on the steers and total of the year on the under... just glad i wasnt one of the suckers who bought your picks...
avatar

Posted by btd117
4 years ago

I took the over and got lucky. This game should have had alot more points scored...Pittsburgh could have easily won by 2 touchdowns if they knew how to punch it in from 5 yards out.
avatar

Posted by MasterLockLine
4 years ago

Good handicappers learn from bad picks. Guys like him are destined to repeat them. Somebody needs to subsidize the bookmakers for the rest of us.
avatar

Posted by Blackshirt51
4 years ago

YA NEVER PLAY THE FAVORITE WITH THE UNDER BRO!!! ONE MORE TIME>>>>>>FAVORITES GO WITH THE OVERS AND DOGS SHOULD BE BET WITH THE UNDERS.......ALL THE PROS KNOW THE PERCENTAGES AND YOUR SAYING THOSE WERE THE PLAYS??????OITT WON THE SUPER BOWL WITH INSIDE OUT STATS EVEN. ADMIT PIT WAS NOT THE PLAY EVER WITH THE MOST VALUE AND A SHARP WOULD NOT PLAY A FAVORITE TICKET WITH AN UNDER TOTAL IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!! OR SHOULD I SAY A SHARP SHARP WOULD NOT DO THIS!!!!!GOOD LUCK TO YOU .......
avatar

Posted by Vividjohn
4 years ago

i refuse to listen to anyone tel me the cards r a good team. 9-7 shuld not even make the playoffs. many 10-6 teams and even 11-5 teams don't make it in prev years cards totally totally lucky.
avatar

Posted by Vividjohn
4 years ago

why would i take a 9-7 team to pitt, now 6 time world champ ring holder. not a chance. the book had to give all those points becuz cards were junk. cards totally lucky to be there ad lucky to cover the ats. this was a perfect example of what a bad beat is.
avatar

Posted by Vividjohn
4 years ago

9-7 regular season team covering the ats. bad beat bad beat bad beat bad beat
avatar

Posted by Vividjohn
4 years ago

bad beat superbowl is exactly rite.
avatar

Posted by Vividjohn
4 years ago

9-7 regualar season team to win the superbowl. garbage.
avatar

Posted by Vividjohn
4 years ago

cards r a passy team. for sure.
avatar

Posted by Vividjohn
4 years ago

not box passy
avatar

Posted by Vividjohn
4 years ago

not box. box
avatar

Posted by Vividjohn
4 years ago

pitt was the rite side. ariz box weak team. lousysuperbowl team got beat by pats 47-7 philly 48-20 and giants 37-29 in the tail end of their playoff run. philly had best record but cards got homefiled in playoff due to winning garbage west. philly had to fite dallas and giants and redskins. cards there due to weak division and slantd NFL plaof rules to division winners. u r rite pitt was the rite side.
avatar

Posted by 3TB3
4 years ago

How about betting on the high-scoring Cardinals getting 6 and a half to 5 to score first AND they then win the toss, but decide to DEFER to second half and Steelers then score on first drive.
avatar

Posted by mojo10
4 years ago

Worst article I've ever read on Covers. Is this guy serious. "Pitt & the Under were the 'right' sides". WTF does that even mean. Apparently they weren't the 'right' sides since the game finished with Arizona covering & the game going Over. Period. You could make excuses after any game explaining why your 'right' side didn't end up winning. Admit it, you were one of the many handicappers that expected the Pitt defense to shut down Zona's Offense and to cover with ease. Only the dumb public was laying money on Zona right? Looks like we were right.
avatar

Posted by David_Payne
4 years ago

Ouch, fellas … For the record, I had Pittsburgh over 27.5. So, no, I was not happy about the outcome. Secondly, bad beats are a part of our hobby and something, that if you take too seriously, will drive you nuts. I personally laugh them off and try to let people vent in these articles. Finally, as mentioned in my unprofessional and whiney article, I do consider a game to be a bad beat if the eventual winning side would have traded sides in a heartbeat late in a game. I will now resign … Good luck everyone and may the next bad beat go your way.
avatar

Posted by buckubad
4 years ago

no doubt, u'd expect this from some crybaby in the forums. looks like it doesnt take much to be writing articles at covers. had under and ariz here and felt the refs controlled way to much of the outcome but most of it was directed at ariz
avatar

Posted by Mantle19
4 years ago

Wow, what an unprofessional article. This piece of writing came off as a bitter rant that really doesn't belong on covers.com. Cardinals stopping Steelers twice (really three times, with a running-over-the-holder call that gave Steelers another sets of downs) with goal-to-go sure has some luck involved, but it's by no means "bad beat". Cardinals penetrated the o-line many time that game on running plays. Cardinals' rushing defense have been stellar in the playoff and I don't know why people still don't give them enough credits, even by this covers.com writer. Remember, that's how they beat the Panthers at their home. In fact, the Cardinals had a very good opportunity to win straight up. The end of the first half was a miraculous break for Steelers. Even if Cardinals didn't score a TD, it was still a 10 point swing. Cardinals went on to later lead the game, coming back from 13 pts down. Bad beat on Steelers? Please, this David Payne guy needs to get off this site before he embarrasses himself any further.
         1   2    next page    last page
You are currently not logged in.
Login | Signup | Help
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Top Response

Posted by Vividjohn
4 years ago

"9-7 regular season team covering the ats. bad beat bad beat bad beat bad beat"