All Forums | Website Promotions

Accuscore System Picks 11/21

...

Participants:

Posts: 205

ridibets

Rookie

Joined: Aug, 2009

Posts: 682

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:08 PM ET #101

on his google docs sheet he had the star ratings which came from accuscore. his first tweet was classic. " it has come to my attention that my system is looking to be used for profit."

"i am not going to let someone use my system for their own profit"

this guys a tool.

Jparker89

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2013

Posts: 18

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:13 PM ET #102

Quote Originally Posted by cmw5123:

as of right now i got the celtics/pacers under 186 and the pelicans -6.5 against the cavs.

Pacers total record 8-3 Celtics total record 9-4

pelicans side record 7-4 cavs side record 9-2

let me know if these qualify. pretty sure they do.

They do when you calculate the percentages of course, but the records for each side do seem higher than what he would show up. I mean look at the start of this thread, they all totalled less than 10, These picks have a combined total of +15.

By the way, regarding this 4 star, 3 star subject. How do accuscore implement this to their projections. Maybe all his picks were only 4 star projections.

Im going to for sure play the pelicans, as another respected capper on another forum likes that play.

jambo12

Prospect

Joined: Jan, 2013

Posts: 356

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:13 PM ET #103

Quote Originally Posted by cmw5123:

as of right now i got the celtics/pacers under 186 and the pelicans -6.5 against the cavs.

Pacers total record 8-3 Celtics total record 9-4

pelicans side record 7-4 cavs side record 9-2

let me know if these qualify. pretty sure they do.

Looks good to me, if Accuscore has correctly predicted the total in Pacers' games 8/11 73% and Celtics games 9/13 69%, combined total 17/24 71%

cmw5123

Prospect

Joined: Jan, 2010

Posts: 103

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:13 PM ET #104

Those are the only 2 plays tonight that i see fellas. The only ones that combined record of accuscore predictions that are above 70% The mavs and jazz total is at 72.5% however accuscore has the total being right at 201 based off of their predicted score and i believe the current total on that game is 201. So I'm assuming thats a no play.

boomersooner18

Veteran

Joined: Aug, 2013

Posts: 2509

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:14 PM ET #105

Quote Originally Posted by cmw5123:

fellas i got an accuscore account if someone can just explain to me the rules behind the system i can try to help out and post the same garbage he posted.

I have to say I made money like most on accuscore, I would not mind pitching in cost 49 a month. any thoughts

FiftyTwoPercent

Rookie

Joined: Nov, 2013

Posts: 520

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:14 PM ET #106

Quote Originally Posted by cmw5123:

as of right now i got the celtics/pacers under 186 and the pelicans -6.5 against the cavs.

Pacers total record 8-3 Celtics total record 9-4

pelicans side record 7-4 cavs side record 9-2

let me know if these qualify. pretty sure they do.

Its not the ATS record, or TOTAL record. Its the record that Accuscore had picked on the team

If Accuscore has pick IND game right 4 time thats 4-1 80% and has picked Boston right 3-1 75%. Combined its 77.5% Accuscore has ben RIGHT. So we use accuser pick this game.

Same fore total.

relaxguys

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2013

Posts: 27

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:15 PM ET #107

Quote Originally Posted by Jparker89:

They do when you calculate the percentages of course, but the records for each side do seem higher than what he would show up. I mean look at the start of this thread, they all totalled less than 10, These picks have a combined total of +15.

By the way, regarding this 4 star, 3 star subject. How do accuscore implement this to their projections. Maybe all his picks were only 4 star projections.

Im going to for sure play the pelicans, as another respected capper on another forum likes that play.

which respected capper is that?

Jparker89

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2013

Posts: 18

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:17 PM ET #108

Quote Originally Posted by relaxguys:

which respected capper is that?

mistermj.

Hustlehard23

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2011

Posts: 268

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:20 PM ET #109

You can't be mad, he was doing mad work for free, he's not taking anything away from accuscore, he's just using the STATS they provide, you can say he will go cold, but it won't its all based on numbers and numbers don't lie, honestly $200 is one play and your paid up for the yr, that's a steal really, to each his own

Jparker89

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2013

Posts: 18

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:22 PM ET #110

Quote Originally Posted by Hustlehard23:

Hey Wayne.

evnguyen05

Prospect

Joined: Oct, 2013

Posts: 13

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:24 PM ET #111

Fiftytwopercent and daytradernation=RESPECT

11spread11

Prospect

Joined: Mar, 2011

Posts: 340

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:27 PM ET #112

Thanks cmw5123......did you get accuscore direct or through a previous poster comment ESPN. Also you said the total is right on the # I guess it's up to each person how much of a difference do u need to play a total???

wwtpglobal

Rookie

Joined: Apr, 2013

Posts: 712

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:28 PM ET #113

Quote Originally Posted by jambo12:

Nothing in Wayne's expalanation about stars:

"

Accuscore simulates each game 10,000 times. Based on the result of the simulates a side is chosen. We are playing the games where accuscore has a record of 70% between both teams. For example:

AccuScore ATS Record in CHI games: 3-0, 100%
AccuScore ATS Record in TOR games: 3-0, 100%

Accuscore is 6-0 so far in any game between the bulls and raptors. It does not mean the bulls or raptors have covered in every game. It means accuscore picked the winning side in each game."

Same for Totals, which seemed to work a lot better than ATS

Jambo - I agree with all, and am on the site attempting to replicate it..So after identifying a game where both sides have been predicted at >70% (as in the example you gave above) how would you determine which side of the spread is the correct one? Is it then to go back to their "expert picks" and take the spread they designated?

FYI - if I understand the totals formula correctly the only play tonight would have been SA/MEM under 184

F1rstdegree

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2013

Posts: 210

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:30 PM ET #114

Really wish I could see the format of accuscore because I have full understanding on how the selections were being made.

It is never a matter of the team covering the side but rather accuscore selecting the winner ATS in a teams games.

jambo12

Prospect

Joined: Jan, 2013

Posts: 356

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:37 PM ET #115

Quote Originally Posted by wwtpglobal:

Jambo - I agree with all, and am on the site attempting to replicate it..So after identifying a game where both sides have been predicted at >70% (as in the example you gave above) how would you determine which side of the spread is the correct one? Is it then to go back to their "expert picks" and take the spread they designated?

FYI - if I understand the totals formula correctly the only play tonight would have been SA/MEM under 184

I would assume accuscore give a tip for the game based on their simulations. If they have 70% record on both teams invokved then their tip should hold up.

cmw5123

Prospect

Joined: Jan, 2010

Posts: 103

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:37 PM ET #116

Yeah i got that. Its the accuscore record on their predictions of the those teams on either the point spread or the total. Thats the records that i am using. I understand the stars now as well in college football. in order to view the records of accuscores prediction on college football u have to click on the stars of the game. He was using solely the 3 and 4 star picks. Navy is the play tonight for college football.

Jparker89

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2013

Posts: 18

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:39 PM ET #117

Quote Originally Posted by jambo12:

I would assume accuscore give a tip for the game based on their simulations. If they have 70% record on both teams invokved then their tip should hold up.

Yeh that's it

Jparker89

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2013

Posts: 18

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:40 PM ET #118

Quote Originally Posted by cmw5123:

Yeah i got that. Its the accuscore record on their predictions of the those teams on either the point spread or the total. Thats the records that i am using. I understand the stars now as well in college football. in order to view the records of accuscores prediction on college football u have to click on the stars of the game. He was using solely the 3 and 4 star picks. Navy is the play tonight for college football.

Thanks for the effort dude.

Jparker89

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2013

Posts: 18

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:41 PM ET #119

Are there any star projections for the nba cmw?

jambo12

Prospect

Joined: Jan, 2013

Posts: 356

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:41 PM ET #120

Quote Originally Posted by Hustlehard23:

200 may be one play but if you never get that play supplied then it is a waste of 200. The guy has already gone back on his word about supplying the tips for free so i would not hold my breath waiting for a response once the 200 has been banked. You will have a gmail address as security if course.

Hustlehard23

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2011

Posts: 268

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:43 PM ET #121

Quote Originally Posted by Jparker89:

Hey Wayne.

Hi yourself, I've been on here and I make my own picks, you guys are just lazy, why get mad, just don't pay, it makes no difference if a guy goes tout or not, you gotta decide in the info was valuable enough to pay for, if not no skin off your nose. Gotta respect a hustler like it was said before

FiftyTwoPercent

Rookie

Joined: Nov, 2013

Posts: 520

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:44 PM ET #122

You might want to try the fade too. When Accuscore has been wrong on a team. 25% or 30%. Just opposite of Being right 75% 80%. Thanks for the effort. Lets see how the picks do. Summarized your analysis it is:

Under BOS/IND

PELICAN

NAVY

Lets see how it works.

charlieg70

Rookie

Joined: Dec, 2011

Posts: 581

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:45 PM ET #123

Quote Originally Posted by warcameagle56:

I just tried to buy a subscription to Accuscore and it wouldn't take..

Kind of reminds me of Obamacare................Typical democrat!!!!

Jparker89

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2013

Posts: 18

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:46 PM ET #124

Quote Originally Posted by Hustlehard23:

Respect a hustler who goes back on his word? Give me a break.

FiftyTwoPercent

Rookie

Joined: Nov, 2013

Posts: 520

Posted: Nov. 22, 2013 - 7:47 PM ET #125

Quote Originally Posted by Hustlehard23:

How about you stop defending the scammer. Or are you him? LOL dude. Have you seen this happened before? It seems like you are using another username to defend yourself.

All Forums | Website Promotions

Accuscore System Picks 11/21

Hot Forum Topics