She will beat coco +350 … Lois Boisson has been unstoppable she was +580 this morning and won 2-0 … she beat almost the top ten players. be on the look out Thursday when they play take the money line +350
She will beat coco +350 … Lois Boisson has been unstoppable she was +580 this morning and won 2-0 … she beat almost the top ten players. be on the look out Thursday when they play take the money line +350
She will beat coco +350 … Lois Boisson has been unstoppable she was +580 this morning and won 2-0 … she beat almost the top ten players. be on the look out Thursday when they play take the money line +350
coco is beatable just bc of her errors, but swiatek will beat boisson in straight sets in the final if she makes it. only way to beat swiatek is to overpower her.
coco is beatable just bc of her errors, but swiatek will beat boisson in straight sets in the final if she makes it. only way to beat swiatek is to overpower her.
[Quote: Originally Posted by kapeto99]If they betted on her last 5 matches off $100 they would be up at least 4k[/Quote
My brain is fried to figure something like that out. How did you do it? Or did you do the bets?
[Quote: Originally Posted by kapeto99]If they betted on her last 5 matches off $100 they would be up at least 4k[/Quote
My brain is fried to figure something like that out. How did you do it? Or did you do the bets?
@HuskyNation1
In her first match against Mertens she was around +300. You bet $100 on that and now you have $400. Take that entire $400 and bet on next match. Keep repeating.
Some people prefer a similar method to this as an alternative to betting futures. Depending how the draw shakes out it may be more or less profitable than just betting the future before the tourney and of course it can allow for a little more flexibility at the end if desired.
@HuskyNation1
In her first match against Mertens she was around +300. You bet $100 on that and now you have $400. Take that entire $400 and bet on next match. Keep repeating.
Some people prefer a similar method to this as an alternative to betting futures. Depending how the draw shakes out it may be more or less profitable than just betting the future before the tourney and of course it can allow for a little more flexibility at the end if desired.
$55.50 right now to win $999 at +1800 to win the title sounds tempting. World #65 knocking off #3, 6, and maybe #2, than possibly #1 or #5, sounds tempting
$55.50 right now to win $999 at +1800 to win the title sounds tempting. World #65 knocking off #3, 6, and maybe #2, than possibly #1 or #5, sounds tempting
No way in hell. Coco wasnt at her best vs Madison and managed to keep the lid on Madison. Lois is going to run the train of hard hits into coco where coco will be overmatched. Lois is primed for this moment in a cinderella run that the world hasnt seen in a long time. Plus, coco is a choke artist in the later stages of tournaments more often than not
Lois vs Aryna for an epic Final
No way in hell. Coco wasnt at her best vs Madison and managed to keep the lid on Madison. Lois is going to run the train of hard hits into coco where coco will be overmatched. Lois is primed for this moment in a cinderella run that the world hasnt seen in a long time. Plus, coco is a choke artist in the later stages of tournaments more often than not
Lois vs Aryna for an epic Final
I don’t buy it. Been gambling a long long time. It’s all designed for the pundits to lose their ass. Everyone on the bandwagon now thinking their value and the rug gets pulled out from under you. It’s all lose
I don’t buy it. Been gambling a long long time. It’s all designed for the pundits to lose their ass. Everyone on the bandwagon now thinking their value and the rug gets pulled out from under you. It’s all lose
The last 31 matches have seen 27 favorites win (20 in straight sets). Boisson is keeping the books afloat in this Slam, because otherwise the dogs are getting slaughtered.
The last 31 matches have seen 27 favorites win (20 in straight sets). Boisson is keeping the books afloat in this Slam, because otherwise the dogs are getting slaughtered.
if you want any indication of how difficult it is to beat coco yesterday was it. keys played great actually moved well, patient, explosive pace on her shots and coco played absolutely awful, zero aggressiveness, horrible forehand, all she did for 2 sets is hit the ball directly to keys rarely ever away from her, she just knew eventually madison would fatigue and as coco said a few days ago she doesnt believe anyone on tour has the stamina to keep up with her other than zheng. in the 3rd is when coco exploited the fatigue of keys and then coco started hitting the winners.
if you want any indication of how difficult it is to beat coco yesterday was it. keys played great actually moved well, patient, explosive pace on her shots and coco played absolutely awful, zero aggressiveness, horrible forehand, all she did for 2 sets is hit the ball directly to keys rarely ever away from her, she just knew eventually madison would fatigue and as coco said a few days ago she doesnt believe anyone on tour has the stamina to keep up with her other than zheng. in the 3rd is when coco exploited the fatigue of keys and then coco started hitting the winners.
But it has zigged two times in a row before that. What happened to the zag?
But it has zigged two times in a row before that. What happened to the zag?
Good girl.
Good girl.
I only started following tennis this year because my gf plays but am I losing my mind? Sweetheart runs in sports always come to an end at some point and Coco is a vastly superior player. The only way she ever loses this is if she beats herself. Why are people whining about "vegas" and being upset at +750 dog getting walloped by the #2 seed?
I only started following tennis this year because my gf plays but am I losing my mind? Sweetheart runs in sports always come to an end at some point and Coco is a vastly superior player. The only way she ever loses this is if she beats herself. Why are people whining about "vegas" and being upset at +750 dog getting walloped by the #2 seed?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.