You need to keep emailing him and tell him you want a refund, email him 20 times a day if you have to, use different email addresses, etc. Next step, how did you pay for his service?
If you used paypal or one of the other ways to pay, you can report him and say that you never received anything in exchange for your payment of $200.
If that doesn't work, you can start blogging on all the websites you can find (the RX forum for example, etc.) and just tell the truth and warn people not to buy his service and explain why.
GL
Exactly. You can still use BETUS.com but DON'T tell them you're using John Morrison's system when you sign up. Morrison will ask you to give them a promotional code when you make your account. Then they will give you adjusted lines in their favor. Especially for basball; I was getting completely different lines than other people who had BETUS.com accounts.
Make another account on a different sportsbook (I use sportsbetting.com) and you'll never have any problems.
John Morrison's system does work; money management is very important. He may try and dismiss a loss here and there; so incorporate that in your numbers. One single loss does alot of damage to you bankroll.
It's not perfect obvisouly, but you can make some good cash using it. The post below from puppetm716 is very accurate.
___________________________________________
"You are not exactly correct. He listed Sac as a C play (it was listed as a play). Sac was playing Philly and getting their clocks cleaned at halftime. The game started at 7:05. At about 9:30 Morrison sent out an email stating that Sac wasn't a play because they were the worst defensive team. I have the email to prove it.
He changed the info on the link he sends.
When questioned on it JM claimed the play was a personal play. He has acted like the game(series) never existed.
Since realistically being 0-1 the system has been money going 72 - 0. Would have had another win but chose not to play Okl City when they fit the system. OKL City won on the A game.
I am not a promoter just looking to make $$$ and give credit where credit is due. Its amazing how many times when the dust clears on a series it is a win even when it seems not to be a smart play.
It just bothers me he doesn't man up about it.
He did the same thing with baseball. Last year his system ended up with 5 losses. (I followed it from day 1). He recalculated the system at the end of the year with a filter that supposedly would have made the system 43-0. That is what he claimed the system was. That still wouldn't be accurate because the Red Sox lost 1 of the series against the Angels at home. The filter eliminates playing lower winning % teams.
Bottom line 72-1 is still awesome, just man up after a hiccup.
Best of Luck"
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
