Siding with the Sportsbooks
I created a system last year from the "reverse line" theory that worked at an incredible rate, 84-31, 73%, netting +52 units, from Aug 30 to Oct 01, 2007. I worked on it from the All-Star break until I finally came up with this version. I've been trying it since day one and it's only breaking even. however, in the past 14 days it's 39-34, 54%,, netting +0.11 unit, an improvement over the first 2 weeks. I didn't really expect this system to work so early in the season.
When it starts to produce at a profitable level, I'll post it.
I created a system last year from the "reverse line" theory that worked at an incredible rate, 84-31, 73%, netting +52 units, from Aug 30 to Oct 01, 2007. I worked on it from the All-Star break until I finally came up with this version. I've been trying it since day one and it's only breaking even. however, in the past 14 days it's 39-34, 54%,, netting +0.11 unit, an improvement over the first 2 weeks. I didn't really expect this system to work so early in the season.
When it starts to produce at a profitable level, I'll post it.
This is exactly what I'm asking about Jack Bauer. when the books come in with unequal action on a game many times they new it would be unequal action and have a vested interest in the minority side. My question would be how would you detect this? What would give you and indication this would be happening?????
I base my picks for baseball exclusively on line movement. You have to know the betting percentages. Sportsinights provides this and covers offers it too with the same feed. Reverse line movement is a general indication of "wiseguy" money. I prefer to fade the public on all of my picks because I believe they are more wrong than right.
The books can't avoid the games, they have to post a number on everyone. And yes, even though the goal "supposedly" is to balance the action, most of the time they don't.
Many times they will post soft lines to trap the public. This issue has been debated but the books gamble too. The only way you can figure this out is to know the betting percentages and monitor line movements up until gametime. Sbrlines is a good place to see line histories on the major sportsbooks for free.
My pick today was the Nationals (even though they lost). They started as +125 dogs but by game time they were even money or even -105-110 at some places yet 70% of the bets were on the other side. Perhaps a well respected betting syndicate or group of wiseguys liked the Nationals and could explain the line move.
But how do you know that these guys are sharps? If the books respect them, than so do I. Regardless of what you do, you have to find a way to make it work for you if this is your choice. It took me awhile to figure it out. I only bet one play a day for baseball and sometimes i flat bet, sometimes i'll use some sort of calculated chase.
Money management is more important than the picks themselves. But like Jack Bauer said, you can't blindly follow it. When I see a reverse line move, I handicap the game myself and try to figure out if the public missed something. I can go on and on, but that's it for now.
Good Luck.
This is exactly what I'm asking about Jack Bauer. when the books come in with unequal action on a game many times they new it would be unequal action and have a vested interest in the minority side. My question would be how would you detect this? What would give you and indication this would be happening?????
I base my picks for baseball exclusively on line movement. You have to know the betting percentages. Sportsinights provides this and covers offers it too with the same feed. Reverse line movement is a general indication of "wiseguy" money. I prefer to fade the public on all of my picks because I believe they are more wrong than right.
The books can't avoid the games, they have to post a number on everyone. And yes, even though the goal "supposedly" is to balance the action, most of the time they don't.
Many times they will post soft lines to trap the public. This issue has been debated but the books gamble too. The only way you can figure this out is to know the betting percentages and monitor line movements up until gametime. Sbrlines is a good place to see line histories on the major sportsbooks for free.
My pick today was the Nationals (even though they lost). They started as +125 dogs but by game time they were even money or even -105-110 at some places yet 70% of the bets were on the other side. Perhaps a well respected betting syndicate or group of wiseguys liked the Nationals and could explain the line move.
But how do you know that these guys are sharps? If the books respect them, than so do I. Regardless of what you do, you have to find a way to make it work for you if this is your choice. It took me awhile to figure it out. I only bet one play a day for baseball and sometimes i flat bet, sometimes i'll use some sort of calculated chase.
Money management is more important than the picks themselves. But like Jack Bauer said, you can't blindly follow it. When I see a reverse line move, I handicap the game myself and try to figure out if the public missed something. I can go on and on, but that's it for now.
Good Luck.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,489
-
Giants vs Rams MNF in-game live
2,483
-
Monday 09/21/2026
460
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,168
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
4,134
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,546
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
5,056
-
Where are they getting enough explosive offense to separate from New York by more than a touchdown
2,568
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,775
-
Monday Night
4,412
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
