Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
?? |
ActionMagnet | 8 |
|
|
@Roughfewweeks if you bet first half, bet you wish you tailed the original post. |
2LEGIT2QUITU | 7 |
|
|
@Pasclasonne MODS - please shut down this account, prospect, spam in your forums. Just another loser trying to scam your members. |
HabsHater88 | 3 |
|
|
@Chrisg44 @JetsFan86 this correction makes it a loser, not a winner, finished at 50 yards. i bet with you because you were 0-2 and figured it’s hard to go 0-2 twice in a row, now you are 0-4, don’t know if i should bet with you cuz you are due or fade. btw, i’ve been a jets fan since i was 8, 37 now and decided today i am no longer a jets fan, at this point i’d rather have no football team than be a jets fan anymore. |
JetsFan86 | 35 |
|
|
@JetsFan86 no, incorrect, you edited to receiving yards over 50.5, as if now he has 50 yards |
JetsFan86 | 35 |
|
|
replied to
I will even help you Cheating, Lying and Stealing Democrats make money this weekend
in Penalty Box @DogbiteWilliams in case you didn't know, Trump stopped planes from China in Late January while Biden, Harris and other dims called him Xenophobic. Then in Late March, democratic party swapped and said he didn't close the flights soon enough (that's what the dems do, say one thing then do another). JUST IMAGINE, if the Dems had their way, flights from China would not have been stopped till March allowing thousands more infected into the US. So if anything, Trump curtailed more infections coming in. Had dems had their way, more flights in from China till March, lotsa more US deaths. An Australia newscaster said it perfectly "you are ignorant if you think having a different president in office in 2020 would have changed the death numbers" Plus, look at Cali and NY some of the worst states, all democratically run, looks like all the democratic measures in those cities did great, eh? You need to stop watching whatever news show you watch and look into alternate unbiased news.
|
deepstate | 69 |
|
|
I just think the OP bet on the Bengals at less than +5.5 and is just pissed he lost money. Makes me think about 14 year olds who lost a bet in mario cart when I see posts like this. He should change his handle to Ring-DUNG-Do |
RING-DANG-DO | 47 |
|
|
This may be the dumbest thing I have read on Covers.com Forums Ever! The Ravens scored 38 pts vs the Browns, Bengals scored 30. Did you not see some of his throws, this is his first year with a shitty team. Get a life OP, and stop betting, if you think he has peaked already, we can see you know absolutely NOTHING about the NFL. Go sit on a pole. |
RING-DANG-DO | 47 |
|
|
Jazz is now winning 64-55 at halftime, OP - you are a moron, 2nd post - you are moron too, 3rd post - you won your bet stop complaining before result even happens. Are you both in High School or just making your first bet? Killa, you are the only person on thread with intelligent/logical thought. CHIT, you have logic too, kinda gotta agree with you recently
|
GustavoFring | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bigtime31: . Are these picks for today Look at post 1 and 4 along with their timestamps and you will have answered your own question. |
VanDutch | 19 |
|
|
replied to
Cleveland Cavaliers may want some revenge tonight, Caves -7.5 is reasonable
in NBA Betting
Do you realize you are in the baseball forum? Is it really that difficult to put your post in the proper forum, you must be a special kind of stupid.
|
RANGER- | 3 |
|
|
yeah, gave same message off 200 max bet
|
Chrisg44 | 11 |
|
|
im sorry that i didnt tell you about it as soon as it happenned, been busy and the first thought in my mind wasn't "i have to run to covers right now" if you really would like, ill tell you as soon as things happen to me.
|
Chrisg44 | 11 |
|
|
yeah, well i wasnt thinking about posting it at time. just wondering if its happenned to anyone else, did u really need to waste your time replying with NOTHING worthwhile?
|
Chrisg44 | 11 |
|
|
have you guy ran into this situation? im betting with local online book. i put 600 on the under alabama game. after the first half, i see over at around 28 and and wanted to bet it bcse the under didnt look good. when i go to bet to cover bet it tells me i have 200 max bet. i was fing furious bcse i dont see how im able to have 600 go in for one thing but not another, wtf?
|
Chrisg44 | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Carll:
may even parlay with LAC -8.5 looks to good to pass up
i like what u r thinking, i've been playing gs -x 1st quarter, which i'll b doing tonight, been hitting like crazy |
Carll | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by hoosiermafia55: yes but i'm risking $405 essentially with that strategy and I could risk only $100 and win $500 No, both strategies, you only risk the same $100, if first bet loses, you lose parlay - $100, if first bet loses on chiefs, you lose same $100 and stop. Plus as stated, you risk same $100 and end up with a lot more than the +500 |
hoosiermafia55 | 8 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by MacTaylor: Ummm...Excuse me...You went 0-2 yesterday...(Charlotte & Indiana) yet your record remains the same....seeing how you post your picks way after the previous games ended, there's no " I didn't see the results yet" excuse..Since you left out 2 losers, you get two Pinocchio's... Hey Moron, Indiana covered the -2, they won 95-86, so he did go 1-1. Are you stupid or something? |
Metallica2467 | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Retburj13: the duck takes the match...in str8's!! lol what does that mean "the duck" |
EaglesPhan36 | 40 |
|
|
I think they made that episode of south park with captain hindsight after thesands.
|
gambleholic63 | 7 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.