Posted:
#1
the Hope and Change version
this is ok right?
this is ok right?
0
Halliburton!!! Halliburton!!!!
Posted:
#8
Rest assured activities like this will work against Obama if he continues to be involved but just scratching the surface. However, he already lost support with his increase in troops in Afghanistan from some libs. Not to worry though, the comparisons are very limited when you look closely.
0
Posted:
#10
Quote Originally Posted by oldtrafford:
It's a Fox News story so it has to be BS!!. When I see the same story on the other networks than i'll believe it.
It's a Fox News story so it has to be BS!!. When I see the same story on the other networks than i'll believe it.
Oh are you being a left wing nut ?Don't wait for the networks to tell you info, go find it yourself !!
Here is a ton of info on them. People on both sides of the isle will be interested in this.
0
Posted:
#12
Quote Originally Posted by oldtrafford:
It's a Fox News story so it has to be BS!!. When I see the same story on the other networks than i'll believe it.
It's a Fox News story so it has to be BS!!. When I see the same story on the other networks than i'll believe it.
After you believe it you will then make fun of Cheney and mock Palin's accent. Anything to detract form the facts.
Don't forget the elitist condescension too
0
Posted:
#13
Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:
Oh are you being a left wing nut ?Don't wait for the networks to tell you info, go find it yourself !!
Here is a ton of info on them. People on both sides of the isle will be interested in this.
Good read Lipps. makes us all look silly for arguing for one side or the other. The jokes on us.
0
Posted:
#18
There is a distinction between an issue with no-bid contracts (which I find to be repugnant) and awarding a contract to a company for whom the Vice-President served as the CEO and was in line to receive a pension, post-vice-presidency, a company that was on the verge of internal bankruptcy.
The use of no-bid contracts has been in existence since the days of Hoover. Obama's promises are simply the comments of just another politician either too naive or too optimistic about changing Washington. Obama nor Biden are benefited personally.
Cheney however.....
Are we defending Cheney?
0
Posted:
#19
Obama used NO BID contract, and SWEETHEART DEALS in the above link .
I am not defending Cheney, and I don't understand why you are Defending Obama for an obvious breach of trust.
I understand that No-Bids have been in existence for a long time, but I bet Hoover didn't run on a platform of not accepting No-bids, neither did Bush, I am surprised I really have to spell this out for you
you really don't understand why this is a big deal, Or you are so in the bag for your guy you are going to look the other way.
which is it?
I am not defending Cheney, and I don't understand why you are Defending Obama for an obvious breach of trust.
I understand that No-Bids have been in existence for a long time, but I bet Hoover didn't run on a platform of not accepting No-bids, neither did Bush, I am surprised I really have to spell this out for you
you really don't understand why this is a big deal, Or you are so in the bag for your guy you are going to look the other way.
which is it?
0
Posted:
#20
Quote Originally Posted by rick3117:
Obama used NO BID contract, and SWEETHEART DEALS in the above link .
I am not defending Cheney, and I don't understand why you are Defending Obama for an obvious breach of trust.
I understand that No-Bids have been in existence for a long time, but I bet Hoover didn't run on a platform of not accepting No-bids, neither did Bush, I am surprised I really have to spell this out for you
you really don't understand why this is a big deal, Or you are so in the bag for your guy you are going to look the other way.
which is it?
Obama used NO BID contract, and SWEETHEART DEALS in the above link .
I am not defending Cheney, and I don't understand why you are Defending Obama for an obvious breach of trust.
I understand that No-Bids have been in existence for a long time, but I bet Hoover didn't run on a platform of not accepting No-bids, neither did Bush, I am surprised I really have to spell this out for you
you really don't understand why this is a big deal, Or you are so in the bag for your guy you are going to look the other way.
which is it?
Perhaps you should reread my post and tell me where I defended Obama?
0
Posted:
#21
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
There is a distinction between an issue with no-bid contracts (which I find to be repugnant) and awarding a contract to a company for whom the Vice-President served as the CEO and was in line to receive a pension, post-vice-presidency, a company that was on the verge of internal bankruptcy.
The use of no-bid contracts has been in existence since the days of Hoover. Obama's promises are simply the comments of just another politician either too naive or too optimistic about changing Washington. Obama nor Biden are benefited personally.
Cheney however.....
Are we defending Cheney?
I don't know who the hell we is......but but a no bid contract is just another payoff. Of course this is the change we were supposed to have.
0
Posted:
#23
Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:
I don't know who the hell we is......but but a no bid contract is just another payoff. Of course this is the change we were supposed to have.
Are we defending Obama's change ?
Perhaps you should reread my post and tell me where I defended Obama?
Too bad that the distinction between no-bid contracts to benefit a party and a secured contract to benefit a sitting vice-president has to be spelled out. One would think the distinction would be more apparent.
0
Posted:
#25
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Perhaps you should reread my post and tell me where I defended Obama?
Too bad that the distinction between no-bid contracts to benefit a party and a secured contract to benefit a sitting vice-president has to be spelled out. One would think the distinction would be more apparent.
I have a problem with a no bid contract and with someone that was bringing change. You are stuck on the Cheney stuff.
0
Hot Forum Topics
