Surely it can be done but the easiest path is the one chosen by far.
No offense to anyone on Appalachian range but they do not compare to the Rockies.
10 times the headache is what you call for.
Europe wont accept number 8 crude to refine tar sand is number 10 or less than 290 gear weight only asia can allow this sour crude is number 6 or 120 weight
Europe wont accept number 8 crude to refine tar sand is number 10 or less than 290 gear weight only asia can allow this sour crude is number 6 or 120 weight
Where did you find your info? Any idea on other countries?
Where did you find your info? Any idea on other countries?
Where did you find your info? Any idea on other countries?
Where did you find your info? Any idea on other countries?
Yeah---I get some time I am gonna look that up and see how others handle it---gotta be some benefit---otherwise why let another country run a line through yours.
Not sure financial disclosures would address that issue? Do they? Should be more a country to country agreement I would think?
Yeah---I get some time I am gonna look that up and see how others handle it---gotta be some benefit---otherwise why let another country run a line through yours.
Not sure financial disclosures would address that issue? Do they? Should be more a country to country agreement I would think?
Yeah---I get some time I am gonna look that up and see how others handle it---gotta be some benefit---otherwise why let another country run a line through yours.
Not sure financial disclosures would address that issue? Do they? Should be more a country to country agreement I would think?
Yeah---I get some time I am gonna look that up and see how others handle it---gotta be some benefit---otherwise why let another country run a line through yours.
Not sure financial disclosures would address that issue? Do they? Should be more a country to country agreement I would think?
Oh I am sure of that.
But it seems logical Canada or Valero at least would guarantee some assurances on cleanup and/or benefits. Would be simple to negotiate from our end. Give us this and this; or no go.
Oh I am sure of that.
But it seems logical Canada or Valero at least would guarantee some assurances on cleanup and/or benefits. Would be simple to negotiate from our end. Give us this and this; or no go.
Because Republicans cannot be so ignorant to believe that we will benefit after the guys have said the oil will not stay here or even give us benefits. The job thing is nonsense as well. So, again I am confused as to why Republicans seem to think it is a good deal. Also, am not sure (because I haven't seen the wording, yet) why Democrats swear it is such a bad deal.
It is almost like boths sides have chosen to believe, and stick, to what they want to believe.
Because Republicans cannot be so ignorant to believe that we will benefit after the guys have said the oil will not stay here or even give us benefits. The job thing is nonsense as well. So, again I am confused as to why Republicans seem to think it is a good deal. Also, am not sure (because I haven't seen the wording, yet) why Democrats swear it is such a bad deal.
It is almost like boths sides have chosen to believe, and stick, to what they want to believe.
Oh I am sure of that.
But it seems logical Canada or Valero at least would guarantee some assurances on cleanup and/or benefits. Would be simple to negotiate from our end. Give us this and this; or no go.
Oh I am sure of that.
But it seems logical Canada or Valero at least would guarantee some assurances on cleanup and/or benefits. Would be simple to negotiate from our end. Give us this and this; or no go.
Enbridge and Kinder Morgan have proposed new or expanded pipelines to the U.S. West Coast, which are only in the preliminary stages of planning and regulatory review. Kinder Morgan aims to expand its existing Trans Mountain pipeline system by building a second pipeline within the same right-of-way. The expansion would increase Trans Mountain's capacity to 890,000 bbl/d. The company has submitted an application with the National Energy Board (NEB) and expects to begin construction in late 2015. Meanwhile, Enbridge is pursuing the Northern Gateway Pipeline Project, which would end at a deepwater port in Kitimat, British Columbia. Northern Gateway would include a 525,000 bbl/d crude oil pipeline and a smaller parallel pipeline to carry condensate back to Alberta expected to begin in 2018.34
The completion of either or both of the competing Kinder Morgan and Enbridge projects would create a new export outlet for oil sands. Additional pipeline capacity to Canada's west coast would reduce Canada's overland dependence on the U.S. market while providing access to growing Asian economies in the Pacific Basin, which could have important implications for trade flows and the prices received by Canadian oil producers. The proposed west coast projects must overcome opposition, particularly due to concerns about the risk of pipeline or tanker spills in British Columbia and among affected aboriginal First Nations groups.35
Enbridge and Kinder Morgan have proposed new or expanded pipelines to the U.S. West Coast, which are only in the preliminary stages of planning and regulatory review. Kinder Morgan aims to expand its existing Trans Mountain pipeline system by building a second pipeline within the same right-of-way. The expansion would increase Trans Mountain's capacity to 890,000 bbl/d. The company has submitted an application with the National Energy Board (NEB) and expects to begin construction in late 2015. Meanwhile, Enbridge is pursuing the Northern Gateway Pipeline Project, which would end at a deepwater port in Kitimat, British Columbia. Northern Gateway would include a 525,000 bbl/d crude oil pipeline and a smaller parallel pipeline to carry condensate back to Alberta expected to begin in 2018.34
The completion of either or both of the competing Kinder Morgan and Enbridge projects would create a new export outlet for oil sands. Additional pipeline capacity to Canada's west coast would reduce Canada's overland dependence on the U.S. market while providing access to growing Asian economies in the Pacific Basin, which could have important implications for trade flows and the prices received by Canadian oil producers. The proposed west coast projects must overcome opposition, particularly due to concerns about the risk of pipeline or tanker spills in British Columbia and among affected aboriginal First Nations groups.35
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.