"Piss Off' is now enough

Proving our point well done.  Tough standard moving forward.

Well do you consider that term to be constructive conversation? If you cuss someone out and are asked to not do that and you do it again is there going to be a good result that follows?

You prove your own point, if you cannot have disagreements and be respectful I would suggest not replying versus insults and attacks.

 How about the caulde comment in my Biden thread? Would you consider that "constructive"?

@wallstreetcappers

Piss off.

You even stalk me into the box.  You're unable to separate your official duties with you personal political positions that also crumble under their own weight.

It's both transparent and sad.

@THEMUGG

Unable to show one lib sent to the box post inauguration.

It’s ok buddy give me a hug

Don't ya know, they are all victims now. 

What a place.

Yes he/she/them would. 

@THEMUGG

To not come in, argue, and get the last word is secretly killing buddy, there's solace in that.

Interesting to me the tone and script has changed since the last overstep that got aired in the help forum.

For the love God man - please just box me - so we can finally satisfy the ladies in here 

It really has nothing to do with you, and your involvement is only to illustrate a point. Even if you were boxed, it would be meaningless. You would simply be a sacrificial lamb.

It really has nothing to do with you, and your involvement is only to illustrate a point. Even if you were boxed, it would be meaningless. You would simply be a sacrificial lamb.

Ok - but what are you guys end goal ? You are discussing with the guy you have a problem with about you not liking the way he does his “job” ? Has that ever worked in the past you have done that (just in life in general)

"You are discussing with the guy you have a problem with"

 Misread of the situation. 

No one has a problem with the guy but rather his inability to separate personal politics that run counter-current to his own from his official duties representing covers.

His partisan bias disproportionately manifests towards those he views (labels) a certain way deteriorating their experience on covers.

What your referring to would be his poor attempts to justify his actions with means other than stated guidelines while dismissing (routinely) behavior warranting time served.  Means that when called out, and proven false, perpetuate his bias as "history" or "angst"

The end game, not much.  Eventually people will tire, move on, and they'll win at the detriment of covers usership.  They have a forum and platform to self counsel eachother through their TDS and continued failed policies (with lightsbulbs and thumbs up) and thought while watching their party continually get wholly rejected by the American people.

And then eventually piss off for good, cause I know and age discrepancy when I see one.

Also very important to note that most on a given "side" are perfectly fine ignoring him (and his 4,000 characters) until he inserts himself into conversations for reasons other than advancement and subsequently people end up with accommodations such as mine.

There is no end goal for me. I'll just always call a spade a spade. I'm gonna calling out hypocrisy, gas lighting, and borderline harassment. Just holding a mirror up. Nothing will come of it, and at the end of the day, that's fine. This is still just a chat forum on a gambling website. None of this is consequential.

"None of this is consequential."

Football can't get here fast enough.