All Forums | Penalty Box

Congrats SF.......you will win the Superbowl!!!!!

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 7604
Posts: 130
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 13652
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

Time for Capers to go....

2 years ago they had the 2nd best D in the league....

Last two years when it matters they have nothing,.....

 

Wouldnt mind seeing Lovie brought in to coach the D



Rob Ryan is available.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #27

Quote Originally Posted by CalBear:

Gb gave up that fumble but if you're going to mention that, than mention gb pick 6...that pick 6 washes that fumble.

 

Both teams had turnovers, thats not my point.

 

My only point was you and the other guy claimed they were "man-handled"....the is true for the 2-4th qtrs.....

But.....

GB was getting the ball back up 14-7....you cant be getting "man-handled" up 7 getting the ball back....

After that fumble...yes 100% manhandled.....until the fumble INCORRECT....

Also, Gb forced that INT, nobody forced that fumble....rookie just dropped a kick

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #28

Quote Originally Posted by Absolutxedge22:



Rob Ryan is available.

 

Will be shocked if he isnt on the Jets.....but I would take him no doubt

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 13652
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

 

Will be shocked if he isnt on the Jets.....but I would take him no doubt



I'm a Cowboys fan....don't think he was the problem with that team.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #30

Quote Originally Posted by Absolutxedge22:



I'm a Cowboys fan....don't think he was the problem with that team.

 

Not at all....he had injuries all over the field and was a game away from getting to the playoffs

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 13652
Posted: #31
Monte Kiffin who is 73 or some crap.

My team sucks lol.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #32

Quote Originally Posted by Absolutxedge22:

Monte Kiffin who is 73 or some crap.

My team sucks lol.

 

Is that who they hired???   He was awful at USC

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #33

In reality, i was correct about more things about this game than I was incorrect about....

Obviously, I thought Gb would win....

However, I said if GB won it would stay under, if SF won it would go over.....

I didnt think Capers would have such a bad plan....thats pretty much all I was wrong about....

I said SF wouldnt shut-down GB....I was correct

I said GB would run the ball....I was correct 100+ yds and 6+ yds per carry

I said GB line would be fine...I was correct...What did SF get, 1 or 2 sacks??

In the breakdown of the game, I was correct on about 80% of my predictions....but missed the biggest one....Kaep doing whatever he wanted to do....it happens!!!!

Still up alot of money on the year, still up on the playoffs and still won yesterday

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 2876
Posted: #34
packers got manhandled. not sure what game you were watching. bad throw by kap that turned into pick 6. a bomb by rodgers that jones made a remarkable catch on, followed up by the td run. it may have been 14-7, but packers weren't moving the ball and 49ers were moving the ball pretty easily even though a drive was stalled. all you have to do is look at the numbers, clearly showed the 49ers were dominating but a mistake gave the packers 7 points. you can easily say it was 7-7 if you take off that pick 6 and packers would be lucky the score was such. more than half the time, i say james jones doesn't make that catch. without that unbelievable catch, packers would of been punting. 

time of possession. yardage. yardage allowed. number of plays. clear advantage to 49ers.

i'm sure you've heard teams getting dominated but only down a few points in nba, or only down 1 td, 1 fg or only a 2 possession game. a very good example is texans/bengals 1h. texans DOMINATED that 1st half, not sure what to say if you disagree, but because of a pick 6, they were only up 9-7 at half. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 2876
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

In reality, i was correct about more things about this game than I was incorrect about....

Obviously, I thought Gb would win....

However, I said if GB won it would stay under, if SF won it would go over.....

I didnt think Capers would have such a bad plan....thats pretty much all I was wrong about....

I said SF wouldnt shut-down GB....I was correct

I said GB would run the ball....I was correct 100+ yds and 6+ yds per carry

I said GB line would be fine...I was correct...What did SF get, 1 or 2 sacks??

In the breakdown of the game, I was correct on about 80% of my predictions....but missed the biggest one....Kaep doing whatever he wanted to do....it happens!!!!

Still up alot of money on the year, still up on the playoffs and still won yesterday


sf wouldn't shut down gb? were you really watching the same game? yes, the packers scored 31 points. 7 of which were at the start of the game from a pick 6. and 7 was in the last minute with the 49ers up 21 and game clearly over. packers only score 17 points on offense when the game counted. they got shut down, end of story. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by dgnowsf:


sf wouldn't shut down gb? were you really watching the same game? yes, the packers scored 31 points. 7 of which were at the start of the game from a pick 6. and 7 was in the last minute with the 49ers up 21 and game clearly over. packers only score 17 points on offense when the game counted. they got shut down, end of story. 

 

Funny....people said all I do is make excuses. 

Defense is part of the game.

Fact is....with 7 min left in the 3rd qtr...it was 24-24.  SF didnt shut-down GB.

People said GB WONT run the ball....GB CANT PROTECT Rodgers....

Maybe SF dominated time of poss and on offense, but it doesnt change the fact that it was 24-24 in the middle of the 3rd qtr

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 2876
Posted: #37
since when did aaron rodgers going 18 for 29 194 1 td 1 int considered not being shut down? these are the numbers not including his last drive where he got a garbage td going 8 for 10, 75 yards and a td.


 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by dgnowsf:

packers got manhandled. not sure what game you were watching. bad throw by kap that turned into pick 6. a bomb by rodgers that jones made a remarkable catch on, followed up by the td run. it may have been 14-7, but packers weren't moving the ball and 49ers were moving the ball pretty easily even though a drive was stalled. all you have to do is look at the numbers, clearly showed the 49ers were dominating but a mistake gave the packers 7 points. you can easily say it was 7-7 if you take off that pick 6 and packers would be lucky the score was such. more than half the time, i say james jones doesn't make that catch. without that unbelievable catch, packers would of been punting. 

time of possession. yardage. yardage allowed. number of plays. clear advantage to 49ers.

i'm sure you've heard teams getting dominated but only down a few points in nba, or only down 1 td, 1 fg or only a 2 possession game. a very good example is texans/bengals 1h. texans DOMINATED that 1st half, not sure what to say if you disagree, but because of a pick 6, they were only up 9-7 at half. 

 

Im not going to go back and look at the exact numbers.....

But.....

 

Im guessing SF converted atleast 6.....3rd downs and 8 or longer...

I know they got 2 of their TDS on that distant, and I can think of 3 more huge first downs they got.....

Obviously, pathetic D by GB....but just a couple stops and its a different story....

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 2876
Posted: #39
are you really that delusional?

the packers didn't run the ball on the 49ers.

harris had 1 18 yard run. rodgers had a scramble alla kap for 17 yards. cobb had a 19 yard run.

3 runs, 54 yards. pretty good. 18 ypc

what did they do in the other 13 runs? 50 yards. 3.85 ypc

numbers are skewed, quit being delusional.

run the ball on the 49ers? they ran the ball a total of 16 times lol

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by dgnowsf:

since when did aaron rodgers going 18 for 29 194 1 td 1 int considered not being shut down? these are the numbers not including his last drive where he got a garbage td going 8 for 10, 75 yards and a td.


 

Im not saying he had a great game....but SF didnt shut them down....

21 points at half...24 in the 3rd....thats not shut down...

GB had 6 yds per rush...just a couple sacks...

I didnt realize 62% passing is being shut down....His INT it was a long punt

 

Kaep ended the game 55% passing

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by dgnowsf:

are you really that delusional?

the packers didn't run the ball on the 49ers.

harris had 1 18 yard run. rodgers had a scramble alla kap for 17 yards. cobb had a 19 yard run.

3 runs, 54 yards. pretty good. 18 ypc

what did they do in the other 13 runs? 50 yards. 3.85 ypc

numbers are skewed, quit being delusional.

run the ball on the 49ers? they ran the ball a total of 16 times lol

 

Youre funny

 

Did anybody think GB would run for 100????  NO....thats a fact.  Who cares how they got it.

What did Gore do then???  He had what 120 yds on 20+ carries???  2 of them got him 60yds...

Back when AP ran for 210 in GB.....two runs got him 140 yds....does that mean GB shut him down???

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 2876
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

 

Im not going to go back and look at the exact numbers.....

But.....

 

Im guessing SF converted atleast 6.....3rd downs and 8 or longer...

I know they got 2 of their TDS on that distant, and I can think of 3 more huge first downs they got.....

Obviously, pathetic D by GB....but just a couple stops and its a different story....


couple of stops and different story. isn't that how all games go? 

gb offense got shut down, 17 points when it counted. they got 7 from the pick 6 and garbage 7 at the end.

gb didn't run the ball. only 16 rushes. 3 big runs for 54 yards. other 13 totaling only 50 yards. you can't run the ball on a team when you only have 16 rushes. 

aaron rodgers going 18 for 29 for 194 yards 1 td/1 int when it counted isn't being shut down? are you shitting? those numbers are horrible. 

21 at half? lol 7 came on defense. 24 at the end of 3? yes, 7 came on defense. so you had 17 points at the end of 3. probably only 17 points truly from offense the whole game until the garbage td. 

green bay avgs 27 a game (most is from offense). didn't realize allowing only 17 points isn't getting shut down. 

you're a packer fan, i get it, but it is clear as day that you are being delusional
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 270
Posted: #43
Still not sold on Colin "Habib" Kaepernick.  All his "big" games came against shitty defenses, including Green Bay, New England, zona, etc.  Would love to see him try his free wheeling play against Seattle again. The tattooed "badass" would not be the same under duress the Seahawks would force on him, a la a couple weeks back.  Defense wins championships, not WAC qb's.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 2876
Posted: #44
you're so funny. you actually think they packers ran the ball on the 49ers. numbers lie. watch the game. packers didn't do anything on offense, they were shut down. 

you just compared AP to your packers run game 

that's pretty much where i'm done with an idiot who has no eyes and is clearly just seeing one side of the game
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by dgnowsf:


couple of stops and different story. isn't that how all games go? 

gb offense got shut down, 17 points when it counted. they got 7 from the pick 6 and garbage 7 at the end.

gb didn't run the ball. only 16 rushes. 3 big runs for 54 yards. other 13 totaling only 50 yards. you can't run the ball on a team when you only have 16 rushes. 

aaron rodgers going 18 for 29 for 194 yards 1 td/1 int when it counted isn't being shut down? are you shitting? those numbers are horrible. 

21 at half? lol 7 came on defense. 24 at the end of 3? yes, 7 came on defense. so you had 17 points at the end of 3. probably only 17 points truly from offense the whole game until the garbage td. 

green bay avgs 27 a game (most is from offense). didn't realize allowing only 17 points isn't getting shut down. 

you're a packer fan, i get it, but it is clear as day that you are being delusional

WOW....ok man, youre right   Now I guess I know what it feels like when people get annoyed with me

I give up, ha!!!

You claim I am the one who is delusional....

 

If you asked 1000 people on this site if GB would rush for 100 yds last night.....999 or 1000 would say NO....who cares how they did it??  They did it....who cares if they did it on 16 carries????  Obviously maybe they should have done it more

YET....you are the one coming up with excuse after excuse.

I didnt realize points late in a game dont count, or from a defense dont count. 

As for the 27 ppg you claim GB averaged....none of that number comes from late scores or the defense???  Got it

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 2876
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by HumphreyBogart:

Still not sold on Colin "Habib" Kaepernick.  All his "big" games came against shitty defenses, including Green Bay, New England, zona, etc.  Would love to see him try his free wheeling play against Seattle again. The tattooed "badass" would not be the same under duress the Seahawks would force on him, a la a couple weeks back.  Defense wins championships, not WAC qb's.

lol this was a trap game. everyone knew it. i'm a 49ers fan. i called it before they even beat the patriots. you can check the threads if it is still posted. seahawks lost to alex smith. enough said. it was one game. nobody showed up that game for the 49ers. offense, defense, special teams, coaches. got down early and then the block fg sealed it. 49ers almost missing players in that game, justin smith to name one. 

seahawks should of lost to rg2 but he was rg0 after he went up 14-0. 

i'm hoping they beat the falcons
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 21426
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by dgnowsf:

packers got manhandled. not sure what game you were watching. bad throw by kap that turned into pick 6. a bomb by rodgers that jones made a remarkable catch on, followed up by the td run. it may have been 14-7, but packers weren't moving the ball and 49ers were moving the ball pretty easily even though a drive was stalled. all you have to do is look at the numbers, clearly showed the 49ers were dominating but a mistake gave the packers 7 points. you can easily say it was 7-7 if you take off that pick 6 and packers would be lucky the score was such. more than half the time, i say james jones doesn't make that catch. without that unbelievable catch, packers would of been punting. 

time of possession. yardage. yardage allowed. number of plays. clear advantage to 49ers.

i'm sure you've heard teams getting dominated but only down a few points in nba, or only down 1 td, 1 fg or only a 2 possession game. a very good example is texans/bengals 1h. texans DOMINATED that 1st half, not sure what to say if you disagree, but because of a pick 6, they were only up 9-7 at half. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by dgnowsf:

you're so funny. you actually think they packers ran the ball on the 49ers. numbers lie. watch the game. packers didn't do anything on offense, they were shut down. 

you just compared AP to your packers run game 

that's pretty much where i'm done with an idiot who has no eyes and is clearly just seeing one side of the game

 

I didnt compare AP to the GB run game,......

Im making your point as you claim......

AP ran for 210 on 21 carries, but 140 came on 2 runs....

According to you, he then only 70 yds on 19 carries thats only 3.6 per carry.....so ACCORDING do you GB shut him down right??

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 2876
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

WOW....ok man, youre right   Now I guess I know what it feels like when people get annoyed with me

I give up, ha!!!

You claim I am the one who is delusional....

 

If you asked 1000 people on this site if GB would rush for 100 yds last night.....999 or 1000 would say NO....who cares how they did it??  They did it....who cares if they did it on 16 carries????  Obviously maybe they should have done it more

YET....you are the one coming up with excuse after excuse.

I didnt realize points late in a game dont count, or from a defense dont count. 

As for the 27 ppg you claim GB averaged....none of that number comes from late scores or the defense???  Got it


LOL 

when you say, sf won't shut down gb. that is gb's offense vs sf's defense. you ask 1 million out of 1 million people, and the only person who would think you were including sf's offense vs gb's defense would be you. so, yes, gb had 24 points against sf's defense. and yes, 7 came when the game is over which means they scored 17 points = shut down. 3 points in first 27 minutes of 2nd half. that isn't getting shut down? what is? i guess it had to be 0 points in 27 minutes. 

or maybe when you said shut down, you meant shut out. 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 2876
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

 

I didnt compare AP to the GB run game,......

Im making your point as you claim......

AP ran for 210 on 21 carries, but 140 came on 2 runs....

According to you, he then only 70 yds on 19 carries thats only 3.6 per carry.....so ACCORDING do you GB shut him down right??


you're making another comparison from gb run game to ap. 

you look at jets vs titans. cj2k had 21 carries for 122 yards, impressive 5.8 ypc. 1 run was 94 yards. so according to you, cj2k ran the ball all over the jets right? i mean, he only had 20 carries for 24 yards in his other carries, 0.83 ypc. 

are you really saying cj2k ran the ball on the jets?

stats lie, watch the game. 
All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.