Undertaker (-130) vs Shane Mcmahon

Come on now. I was startled by this when I came upon it today. (It didn't meet the -129 or lower to post it in the Bubba thread so I made this one).



"- WWE released financial data this week that revealed Shane McMahon has not signed a contract with the company as a performer and he has not been hired for an executive role. WWE expects to pay Shane in excess of $120,000 for his role as a performer leading to WrestleMania 32."


No way Shane Mcmahon would neglect his other business ventures and become a full-time on air talent in a long term program following wrestlemania where he would pretty much play the boss of the company for a measly $120k. Clearly his run with the company is ending either at Wrestlemania or shortly after. He's appearing as a courtesy to his family after the roster became decimated by injuries.


This is not even counting the fact that Undertaker is already being advertised to appear on an upcoming tour for WWE. 

Fantasy bookers are trying to connect a Sting run-in, but that would be so against his character to do that plus he is out with a probably career ending spinal stenosis injury.

I think we get an Undertaker clean win.

To clearify, the upcoming tour tidbit was in response to people thinking it could be his last match. It won't be. Mark Calloway also tweeted this week "This will not be my last"

You could take it as him being in character, but none of the other posts on his twitter are, so take it for what it's worth.

Taker won't job at Mania in his home state, with the "Can't compete at wrestlemania if he loses" stipulation on the table. I've been wrong before, but I just don't see it. Maybe if it was a John Cena megastar, but not Shane Mcmahon lol.

The line moved all the way to -500 now for the Undertaker.

Sting officially announced his retirement last night as well at the Hall of Fame. 

I'm confused. The limits are so low and theres only a couple of books that take action.

Good reasoning and good job Jason.