**$$$ MD Tuesday 11/18 $$$**

NHL 7 - 2

20** Calgary Flames -115

THIS, very very well could be upgraded later, FYI

NCAAF, NBA, & NCAAB posted, other side

———————————————

Updated Record

2071-1928-32

———————————————

NCAAF 46-35

NFL 27-30

NBA 9-9

NHL 7-2

NCAAB 1-4

Boxing 1-0

———————————————

50***** 330-298-8

40**** 219-194-2

30*** 266-235-5

20** 998-977-15

10* 248-229-2

———————————————

Wager scale. Not Units. 50 being the highest graded play, 10 being the lowest graded play

50******

40*****

30***

20**

10*

——————————————-

Will be posting plays in the NFL, NCAAF, NBA, NCAAB, MLB, & NHL forums

——————————————-

Upgrade

Was a 20**

40**** Calgary Flames -115

I'm not disagreeing as I don't have a bet in this game, but why Calgary?  I'm missing something here lol

@FirefIy

 Has to do with the other side 

Sure, but what about them?  Injuries?  On paper the Hawks don't look worse...

He buys picks from Touts and posts them is my guess. 

No idea on why touts like Calgary.  Most likely a Revenge Angle for the 4-0 loss couple weeks ago to Hawks.  Rest of the stats support Hawks.  Revenge angles are great but when you are the worser team, OTR and playing like absolute shit, it's a risky bet.  Good game to pass on.  

Blind squirrels have not disappeared so who knows...

Nice take bud, something is definitely up with Dave?

No updates because of the outcome 5-2 Hawks -40 whatever that is lol and don't forget the -115 vig on top of that.