Big balls taking jets. Good luck hope it hits. ![]()
Very cool to hear your perspective............![]()
They claim he was pretty good at avoiding TO's in college. I never heard of him but I don't pay much attention to college sports.....
Very cool to hear your perspective............![]()
They claim he was pretty good at avoiding TO's in college. I never heard of him but I don't pay much attention to college sports.....
I agree with alot of what u are saying, there's many factors u could add in but I follow the methods I have, as long as I stay the course I should be just fine ..............![]()
..
I agree with alot of what u are saying, there's many factors u could add in but I follow the methods I have, as long as I stay the course I should be just fine ..............![]()
..
The one that you're certain to win is the Colts, because it's the only one I can't imagine taking. The Colts are so done, and Seattle can't possibly be looking ahead here. Seattle's D can contain the Colts, and play so much better at home anyway. Just can't imagine Rivers at 44 and away for as long as he has been, will be up to NFL speed.
The one that you're certain to win is the Colts, because it's the only one I can't imagine taking. The Colts are so done, and Seattle can't possibly be looking ahead here. Seattle's D can contain the Colts, and play so much better at home anyway. Just can't imagine Rivers at 44 and away for as long as he has been, will be up to NFL speed.
Yes, it is one of those games u just have to take it like it or not. Over the long term it should be a winner ....................![]()
Interesting I did see good cappers on you tube saying sprinkle the Jets ML along with taking the points.
Yes, it is one of those games u just have to take it like it or not. Over the long term it should be a winner ....................![]()
Interesting I did see good cappers on you tube saying sprinkle the Jets ML along with taking the points.
Yea Rivers..... crazy............![]()
Will he survive this game ?
Hopefully they run some easy routes for easy completions and use the run game to slow the game and give Seahawks fewer plays.
Hey Flacco came back what, last year or year before I think it was and did pretty well with Browns. I think he was 40 ?
It doesn't seem reasonable Rivers will be very effective. They do have Leonard if he don't look good.
Yea Rivers..... crazy............![]()
Will he survive this game ?
Hopefully they run some easy routes for easy completions and use the run game to slow the game and give Seahawks fewer plays.
Hey Flacco came back what, last year or year before I think it was and did pretty well with Browns. I think he was 40 ?
It doesn't seem reasonable Rivers will be very effective. They do have Leonard if he don't look good.
The Bounce Factor .................
KC -5.5 over Chargers --- 1.1 units
We have a BF play on KC, playing on a low unsustainable level.
Public on Chargers but sharps on KC driving the line higher.
Good spot to back KC .
Packers -1 (-113) over Broncos --- .57 units
The Bounce Factor .................
KC -5.5 over Chargers --- 1.1 units
We have a BF play on KC, playing on a low unsustainable level.
Public on Chargers but sharps on KC driving the line higher.
Good spot to back KC .
Packers -1 (-113) over Broncos --- .57 units
Pending plays ..........
Steelers
Zona
Colts
Jets
KC
Packers
You can get the best lines all week on some of these plays.
Zona up to +10.5
Jets and Colts I saw at +14, I did get the 14 but buying up to do that.
I did miss getting KC at -4 or -4.5 early in the week, I thought that was to high and public would drive it down which I was correct but the sharps backed KC.
I did see some talk early in week on you tube that KC'S dynasty was dead, KC was toast and done which is a pretty good indicator they peaked at the bottom.
Pending plays ..........
Steelers
Zona
Colts
Jets
KC
Packers
You can get the best lines all week on some of these plays.
Zona up to +10.5
Jets and Colts I saw at +14, I did get the 14 but buying up to do that.
I did miss getting KC at -4 or -4.5 early in the week, I thought that was to high and public would drive it down which I was correct but the sharps backed KC.
I did see some talk early in week on you tube that KC'S dynasty was dead, KC was toast and done which is a pretty good indicator they peaked at the bottom.
Josh Jacobs is questionable is all I'm seeing. Backup is too.
Josh Jacobs is questionable is all I'm seeing. Backup is too.
Posted this in its own thread, but worth seeing the Westgate top 5 picks. They're off their best week last time (4-1), but they're still underwater, 31-38 (favorites 21-22, dogs 10-16). They like two dogs this week, one of them Miami (vs Pitt).
BUF 232 -1
CAR 215 -2.5
DET 192 6
GB 180 -1
MIA 179 3.5
By the way, KC was #6 with 176 picks, Denver #7 with 170.
Posted this in its own thread, but worth seeing the Westgate top 5 picks. They're off their best week last time (4-1), but they're still underwater, 31-38 (favorites 21-22, dogs 10-16). They like two dogs this week, one of them Miami (vs Pitt).
BUF 232 -1
CAR 215 -2.5
DET 192 6
GB 180 -1
MIA 179 3.5
By the way, KC was #6 with 176 picks, Denver #7 with 170.
![]()
![]()
Love it with top 5 pick being on the dog Dolphins..............![]()
Love it with top 5 pick being on the dog Dolphins..............![]()
Colts are 13.5 right now, and it occurs to me that Seattle are relatively close to a "twin peaks" fade. It's supposed to come into play when a team is off consecutive games of scoring 30 and giving up fewer than 10. Seahawks beat Minnesota 26-0 and Atlanta 37-9 the last two. When it's a pure twin peaks angle, the ATS record is something like 75% if not a divisional matchup. Don't know what happens when you water down the requirements.
Colts are 13.5 right now, and it occurs to me that Seattle are relatively close to a "twin peaks" fade. It's supposed to come into play when a team is off consecutive games of scoring 30 and giving up fewer than 10. Seahawks beat Minnesota 26-0 and Atlanta 37-9 the last two. When it's a pure twin peaks angle, the ATS record is something like 75% if not a divisional matchup. Don't know what happens when you water down the requirements.
Crap… favs are crushing. I’m banking on Phil rivers. Can’t do worse than the young guys did in early games. Some of these teams/players are quitting.
Crap… favs are crushing. I’m banking on Phil rivers. Can’t do worse than the young guys did in early games. Some of these teams/players are quitting.
Almost took the Chiefs myself, but too many "must win" teams this week.
This morning I saw Denver and Patriots both -120 to be the #1 seed. I think Denver probably takes it. Took em today.
I think you're a little biased toward Green Bay Claw. I remember you were like one team is going to overachieve based on something this season, and I've been seeing Green Bay in the picks pretty often this season. They're been winning though.
Almost took the Chiefs myself, but too many "must win" teams this week.
This morning I saw Denver and Patriots both -120 to be the #1 seed. I think Denver probably takes it. Took em today.
I think you're a little biased toward Green Bay Claw. I remember you were like one team is going to overachieve based on something this season, and I've been seeing Green Bay in the picks pretty often this season. They're been winning though.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.