1) Week 1 favorites that will be underdogs their next game.....91-125-11 ATS, 42.1%....VERSUS Eagles, Commanders, Jaguars, Patriots, Steelers, Bears, Colts, Eagles 2) Week 1 underdogs that will favored their next two games.....67-40-3 ATS, 62.6%...ON Vikings, Ravens, Texans, Chargers 3) Week 1 underdogs that will be favored next game versus a team that will be an underdog their next game....61-35-3 ATS, 63.6%....ON Cowboys, Dolphins, Ravens, Vikings 4) Before week 8, a home favorite whose next game is on Thursday has gone 24-70-2 ATS, 25.5%....................................week 1 VERSUS Packers, Commanders Obviously lines are subject to change.
Thx indigo
Made angle 4:
HF and n:day=Thursday and week=1 and line>-7.5 and total<52.5 and we get a juicy (1-10) ATS ans (3-8) O/U
Will have this in week 1.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
1) Week 1 favorites that will be underdogs their next game.....91-125-11 ATS, 42.1%....VERSUS Eagles, Commanders, Jaguars, Patriots, Steelers, Bears, Colts, Eagles 2) Week 1 underdogs that will favored their next two games.....67-40-3 ATS, 62.6%...ON Vikings, Ravens, Texans, Chargers 3) Week 1 underdogs that will be favored next game versus a team that will be an underdog their next game....61-35-3 ATS, 63.6%....ON Cowboys, Dolphins, Ravens, Vikings 4) Before week 8, a home favorite whose next game is on Thursday has gone 24-70-2 ATS, 25.5%....................................week 1 VERSUS Packers, Commanders Obviously lines are subject to change.
Thx indigo
Made angle 4:
HF and n:day=Thursday and week=1 and line>-7.5 and total<52.5 and we get a juicy (1-10) ATS ans (3-8) O/U
1) Week 1 favorites that will be underdogs their next game.....91-125-11 ATS, 42.1%....VERSUS Eagles, Commanders, Jaguars, Patriots, Steelers, Bears, Colts, Eagles 2) Week 1 underdogs that will favored their next two games.....67-40-3 ATS, 62.6%...ON Vikings, Ravens, Texans, Chargers 3) Week 1 underdogs that will be favored next game versus a team that will be an underdog their next game....61-35-3 ATS, 63.6%....ON Cowboys, Dolphins, Ravens, Vikings 4) Before week 8, a home favorite whose next game is on Thursday has gone 24-70-2 ATS, 25.5%....................................week 1 VERSUS Packers, Commanders Obviously lines are subject to change.
#2 Goes to 78% with these additions:
week=1 and season>2018 and D and n:F and nn:F and line<7 and total<51.5......(11-3) 78.6%
0
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
1) Week 1 favorites that will be underdogs their next game.....91-125-11 ATS, 42.1%....VERSUS Eagles, Commanders, Jaguars, Patriots, Steelers, Bears, Colts, Eagles 2) Week 1 underdogs that will favored their next two games.....67-40-3 ATS, 62.6%...ON Vikings, Ravens, Texans, Chargers 3) Week 1 underdogs that will be favored next game versus a team that will be an underdog their next game....61-35-3 ATS, 63.6%....ON Cowboys, Dolphins, Ravens, Vikings 4) Before week 8, a home favorite whose next game is on Thursday has gone 24-70-2 ATS, 25.5%....................................week 1 VERSUS Packers, Commanders Obviously lines are subject to change.
#2 Goes to 78% with these additions:
week=1 and season>2018 and D and n:F and nn:F and line<7 and total<51.5......(11-3) 78.6%
6) Home favorites that will be underdogs their next two games have gone 269-386-13 ATS in the regular season, 41.1% 7) Away favorites that will be underdogs their next two games have gone 76-102-5 ATS, 42.7%. 8) Away dogs that will be favored their next two games have gone 418-290-18 ATS, 59%. 9) Home dogs that will be favored their next two games have gone 87-76-3 ATS, 53.4%
Played with your #6 and was able to make it 79% (15-4)....hope you do not mind.
AD and n:F and nn:F and week=1 and season>2015 and 7>line>1 and day!=Monday
0
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
6) Home favorites that will be underdogs their next two games have gone 269-386-13 ATS in the regular season, 41.1% 7) Away favorites that will be underdogs their next two games have gone 76-102-5 ATS, 42.7%. 8) Away dogs that will be favored their next two games have gone 418-290-18 ATS, 59%. 9) Home dogs that will be favored their next two games have gone 87-76-3 ATS, 53.4%
Played with your #6 and was able to make it 79% (15-4)....hope you do not mind.
AD and n:F and nn:F and week=1 and season>2015 and 7>line>1 and day!=Monday
5) In weeks 1-5 an away dog of less than 7 points who missed the playoffs last season, playing an opponent that will be an underdog their subsequent game......244-144-19 ATS, 62.1%....ON Panthers, Dolphins
Played with this winner.
1<week<=3 and line<7 and AD and not PO=1 and on:D and seaon>2018 and total>38......(28-6)...82%...NICE
0
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
5) In weeks 1-5 an away dog of less than 7 points who missed the playoffs last season, playing an opponent that will be an underdog their subsequent game......244-144-19 ATS, 62.1%....ON Panthers, Dolphins
Played with this winner.
1<week<=3 and line<7 and AD and not PO=1 and on:D and seaon>2018 and total>38......(28-6)...82%...NICE
I'd rather have a 62% angle with hundreds of results than an 85% angle with 15 results.....siphoning down to the nth degree won't improve your results, long-haul.
I would have thought you'd be cognizant of that after you very successfully faded angles/trends last year with small sample sizes that were perfect or close to it.
0
I'd rather have a 62% angle with hundreds of results than an 85% angle with 15 results.....siphoning down to the nth degree won't improve your results, long-haul.
I would have thought you'd be cognizant of that after you very successfully faded angles/trends last year with small sample sizes that were perfect or close to it.
I'd rather have a 62% angle with hundreds of results than an 85% angle with 15 results.....siphoning down to the nth degree won't improve your results, long-haul. I would have thought you'd be cognizant of that after you very successfully faded angles/trends last year with small sample sizes that were perfect or close to it.
It is 34 sample size,not 15 and we differ on the the relevant priority of sample sizes as discussed before. My success last season was NOT due to
successfully fading trends with small sample sizes but rather integrating regression into a teaser model. I am expecting near 1K plays this year as SDQL
will open up more small sample size data and the regression stuff is fairly consistent. One area of exploration for me this year will be half time props when
SDQL warrants. Have you ever thought about applying these querys to half time wagers?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
I'd rather have a 62% angle with hundreds of results than an 85% angle with 15 results.....siphoning down to the nth degree won't improve your results, long-haul. I would have thought you'd be cognizant of that after you very successfully faded angles/trends last year with small sample sizes that were perfect or close to it.
It is 34 sample size,not 15 and we differ on the the relevant priority of sample sizes as discussed before. My success last season was NOT due to
successfully fading trends with small sample sizes but rather integrating regression into a teaser model. I am expecting near 1K plays this year as SDQL
will open up more small sample size data and the regression stuff is fairly consistent. One area of exploration for me this year will be half time props when
SDQL warrants. Have you ever thought about applying these querys to half time wagers?
@jowchoo I don't think either data base has halftime lines, so ATS results will be tough to research and ascertain. If you know how to find those halftime lines, please let us all know.
Not sure what your trying to do but try this
AD and line<6 and M2>line and week=1 (50-9-3) 84% on killer and 82% on the dog, looking at Q1 and Q2 on the site it works but like you said it doesn't give you halftime lines, you may half to do some homework.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
@jowchoo I don't think either data base has halftime lines, so ATS results will be tough to research and ascertain. If you know how to find those halftime lines, please let us all know.
Not sure what your trying to do but try this
AD and line<6 and M2>line and week=1 (50-9-3) 84% on killer and 82% on the dog, looking at Q1 and Q2 on the site it works but like you said it doesn't give you halftime lines, you may half to do some homework.
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams: @jowchoo I don't think either data base has halftime lines, so ATS results will be tough to research and ascertain. If you know how to find those halftime lines, please let us all know. Not sure what your trying to do but try this AD and line<6 and M2>line and week=1 (50-9-3) 84% on killer and 82% on the dog, looking at Q1 and Q2 on the site it works but like you said it doesn't give you halftime lines, you may half to do some homework.
That is a PRESENT parameter. Naturally if the margin at the half is greater than the line, those teams will almost always cover the spread.
0
Quote Originally Posted by hoody:
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams: @jowchoo I don't think either data base has halftime lines, so ATS results will be tough to research and ascertain. If you know how to find those halftime lines, please let us all know. Not sure what your trying to do but try this AD and line<6 and M2>line and week=1 (50-9-3) 84% on killer and 82% on the dog, looking at Q1 and Q2 on the site it works but like you said it doesn't give you halftime lines, you may half to do some homework.
That is a PRESENT parameter. Naturally if the margin at the half is greater than the line, those teams will almost always cover the spread.
Once someone has a database with half-time lines one can proceed....there are in-game injuries, etc., that are in the equation that one cannot go back in a retrograde scenario to see if something works. There are probably sports database suppliers that sell that information.
If you can beat it (half-time lines) all power to you. The books want to be the candy store, with every type of enticement for kids like us. Too much of a good thing basically benefits them. Does one need to play more than 600 or 1000 plays in a year?
That is where we enter into the realm of Gordon Gecko and crackheads.
0
Once someone has a database with half-time lines one can proceed....there are in-game injuries, etc., that are in the equation that one cannot go back in a retrograde scenario to see if something works. There are probably sports database suppliers that sell that information.
If you can beat it (half-time lines) all power to you. The books want to be the candy store, with every type of enticement for kids like us. Too much of a good thing basically benefits them. Does one need to play more than 600 or 1000 plays in a year?
That is where we enter into the realm of Gordon Gecko and crackheads.
7) Take a week 1 away dog that missed the playoffs last season, whose present opponent will be an underdog their next two games...46-19-5 ATS (+7.6), 70.8%.
These teams have gone 33-37 straight up, with an average line of 4.2.
ON Panthers, and possibly the Dolphins, as that MD/IC line now is around pick 'em.
If you guys post your angles on my thread, explain the parameters so those not versed in query text can understand what your query entails. Ideally, angles with lesser parameters and filters are what this thread is about. If for example, you have more than 5 different filters on a query, post those types of angles on a separate thread.
This thread is not just for query freaks like you and me, but the common man that may not use a database.
1
7) Take a week 1 away dog that missed the playoffs last season, whose present opponent will be an underdog their next two games...46-19-5 ATS (+7.6), 70.8%.
These teams have gone 33-37 straight up, with an average line of 4.2.
ON Panthers, and possibly the Dolphins, as that MD/IC line now is around pick 'em.
If you guys post your angles on my thread, explain the parameters so those not versed in query text can understand what your query entails. Ideally, angles with lesser parameters and filters are what this thread is about. If for example, you have more than 5 different filters on a query, post those types of angles on a separate thread.
This thread is not just for query freaks like you and me, but the common man that may not use a database.
8) Take a week one team (except for away favorites) whose next week line will greater than 3 points stronger than their present opponent's next week line.....158-102-9 ATS, 60.8% (+3.3)
This takes into consideration that the age-old possibility that time is not linear and that what happens in the future can have influence in the past.
Query text.....week = 1 and n:line-on:line<-3 and not AF
Play ON: Vikings, Rams, Lions, Broncos, Commanders, Dolphins, Cowboys
1
8) Take a week one team (except for away favorites) whose next week line will greater than 3 points stronger than their present opponent's next week line.....158-102-9 ATS, 60.8% (+3.3)
This takes into consideration that the age-old possibility that time is not linear and that what happens in the future can have influence in the past.
Query text.....week = 1 and n:line-on:line<-3 and not AF
Play ON: Vikings, Rams, Lions, Broncos, Commanders, Dolphins, Cowboys
8) Take a week one team (except for away favorites) whose next week line will greater than 3 points stronger than their present opponent's next week line.....158-102-9 ATS, 60.8% (+3.3) This takes into consideration that the age-old possibility that time is not linear and that what happens in the future can have influence in the past. Query text.....week = 1 and n:line-on:line<-3 and not AF Play ON: Vikings, Rams, Lions, Broncos, Commanders, Dolphins, Cowboys
Put this in the CFL and you get 65% and not bad on the U, but there's not many games.
0
@ Indigo
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
8) Take a week one team (except for away favorites) whose next week line will greater than 3 points stronger than their present opponent's next week line.....158-102-9 ATS, 60.8% (+3.3) This takes into consideration that the age-old possibility that time is not linear and that what happens in the future can have influence in the past. Query text.....week = 1 and n:line-on:line<-3 and not AF Play ON: Vikings, Rams, Lions, Broncos, Commanders, Dolphins, Cowboys
Put this in the CFL and you get 65% and not bad on the U, but there's not many games.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.