Pats were lucky to get by Denver , tipped FG snd Sean going for it on 4th down hurt them. Pats are a very good team but their QB is still young and I think Seattle w be too much. They beat the Rams twice and the Rams are the second best team in the NFL. I could be wrong but I love the fav Hawks in the SB
Never know but I’m taking Hawks to avenge their stupid loss to the lucky Pats and Wilson’s horrible interception.
9
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Pats were lucky to get by Denver , tipped FG snd Sean going for it on 4th down hurt them. Pats are a very good team but their QB is still young and I think Seattle w be too much. They beat the Rams twice and the Rams are the second best team in the NFL. I could be wrong but I love the fav Hawks in the SB
Never know but I’m taking Hawks to avenge their stupid loss to the lucky Pats and Wilson’s horrible interception.
what revenge are you talking about, lol it was a completely different team with zero personnel related, no players or coaches from either of those teams in that superbowl, what revenge???? Seahawks might loook better on paper but none of the players or coaches will feel there's a need or be extra motivated to avenge that loss, lol
7
what revenge are you talking about, lol it was a completely different team with zero personnel related, no players or coaches from either of those teams in that superbowl, what revenge???? Seahawks might loook better on paper but none of the players or coaches will feel there's a need or be extra motivated to avenge that loss, lol
Pats were lucky to get by Denver , tipped FG snd Sean going for it on 4th down hurt them. Pats are a very good team but their QB is still young and I think Seattle w be too much. They beat the Rams twice and the Rams are the second best team in the NFL. I could be wrong but I love the fav Hawks in the SB Never know but I’m taking Hawks to avenge their stupid loss to the lucky Pats and Wilson’s horrible interception.
BoL
1
Quote Originally Posted by RayRayK:
Pats were lucky to get by Denver , tipped FG snd Sean going for it on 4th down hurt them. Pats are a very good team but their QB is still young and I think Seattle w be too much. They beat the Rams twice and the Rams are the second best team in the NFL. I could be wrong but I love the fav Hawks in the SB Never know but I’m taking Hawks to avenge their stupid loss to the lucky Pats and Wilson’s horrible interception.
Wilson shouldn't even be talked about here. Pete Carroll got cute and decided to pass instead of giving the ball to Marshon Lynch at the 1 yard line. Dumbest call ever
6
@RayRayK
Wilson shouldn't even be talked about here. Pete Carroll got cute and decided to pass instead of giving the ball to Marshon Lynch at the 1 yard line. Dumbest call ever
what revenge are you talking about, lol it was a completely different team with zero personnel related, no players or coaches from either of those teams in that superbowl, what revenge???? Seahawks might loook better on paper but none of the players or coaches will feel there's a need or be extra motivated to avenge that loss, lol
for the fans
the ones they call the '12th man'
5
Quote Originally Posted by skn02:
what revenge are you talking about, lol it was a completely different team with zero personnel related, no players or coaches from either of those teams in that superbowl, what revenge???? Seahawks might loook better on paper but none of the players or coaches will feel there's a need or be extra motivated to avenge that loss, lol
@RayRayK Wilson shouldn't even be talked about here. Pete Carroll got cute and decided to pass instead of giving the ball to Marshon Lynch at the 1 yard line. Dumbest call ever
^^^^
This right here. I still cant believe why Pete would have made that call, the stupidest play call of all time imo. You have the best running back in the league, you got the ball at the one yard line, & the biggest bonehead play call in NFL history.
4
Quote Originally Posted by tbogie1:
@RayRayK Wilson shouldn't even be talked about here. Pete Carroll got cute and decided to pass instead of giving the ball to Marshon Lynch at the 1 yard line. Dumbest call ever
^^^^
This right here. I still cant believe why Pete would have made that call, the stupidest play call of all time imo. You have the best running back in the league, you got the ball at the one yard line, & the biggest bonehead play call in NFL history.
@RayRayK Wilson shouldn't even be talked about here. Pete Carroll got cute and decided to pass instead of giving the ball to Marshon Lynch at the 1 yard line. Dumbest call ever
It wasn't a too bad of call. It was BAD execution by Wilson. He hesitated a bit before throwing that ball which allowed Butler to get in position for INT. Had he thrown it a bit sooner, it would have been a TD. And true, give Marshawn 3 tries, I am sure he would have scored. But Wilson was the darling in Pete Carroll's eyes, so he made that call to give Wilson a chance at the MVP. Had Wilson thrown that TD, he would have been the MVP. As opposed to giving the ball to Marshawn, if Marshawn scored then Marshawn would be the presumptive MVP.
3
Quote Originally Posted by tbogie1:
@RayRayK Wilson shouldn't even be talked about here. Pete Carroll got cute and decided to pass instead of giving the ball to Marshon Lynch at the 1 yard line. Dumbest call ever
It wasn't a too bad of call. It was BAD execution by Wilson. He hesitated a bit before throwing that ball which allowed Butler to get in position for INT. Had he thrown it a bit sooner, it would have been a TD. And true, give Marshawn 3 tries, I am sure he would have scored. But Wilson was the darling in Pete Carroll's eyes, so he made that call to give Wilson a chance at the MVP. Had Wilson thrown that TD, he would have been the MVP. As opposed to giving the ball to Marshawn, if Marshawn scored then Marshawn would be the presumptive MVP.
Rams have one of the worst defenses in the league and Seattle scored 30 on them rightfully so but also gave up 27 and 30 to them! They won't be so lucky against this NE D grant it Maye will have a tough time as a rookie in the big game but Darnold will fold like $2 bill under pressure not to mention he will most likely lose with his usual last minute interception!.Best to you either way!
Gotta take the points in this one brother!
New England+4.5
4
Rams have one of the worst defenses in the league and Seattle scored 30 on them rightfully so but also gave up 27 and 30 to them! They won't be so lucky against this NE D grant it Maye will have a tough time as a rookie in the big game but Darnold will fold like $2 bill under pressure not to mention he will most likely lose with his usual last minute interception!.Best to you either way!
It wasn't a too bad of call. It was BAD execution by Wilson. He hesitated a bit before throwing that ball which allowed Butler to get in position for INT. Had he thrown it a bit sooner, it would have been a TD. And true, give Marshawn 3 tries, I am sure he would have scored.
Except......there wasn't enough time for three running plays. There was only enough time for two running plays, which is why the Seahawks attempted a pass play, to give their offense three shots at the endzone instead of just two. Also long forgotten by those calling it "the dumbest play call ever" is the fact that 66 passes were attempted from the 1-yard line that season and none of them were intercepted until the undrafted rookie Malcolm Butler made the greatest defensive play in Super Bowl history.
6
Quote Originally Posted by seattleseahawks:
It wasn't a too bad of call. It was BAD execution by Wilson. He hesitated a bit before throwing that ball which allowed Butler to get in position for INT. Had he thrown it a bit sooner, it would have been a TD. And true, give Marshawn 3 tries, I am sure he would have scored.
Except......there wasn't enough time for three running plays. There was only enough time for two running plays, which is why the Seahawks attempted a pass play, to give their offense three shots at the endzone instead of just two. Also long forgotten by those calling it "the dumbest play call ever" is the fact that 66 passes were attempted from the 1-yard line that season and none of them were intercepted until the undrafted rookie Malcolm Butler made the greatest defensive play in Super Bowl history.
what revenge are you talking about, lol it was a completely different team with zero personnel related, no players or coaches from either of those teams in that superbowl, what revenge???? Seahawks might loook better on paper but none of the players or coaches will feel there's a need or be extra motivated to avenge that loss, lol
With all that you said, you don't think the media will jump all over that angle, and push it down are throats leading up to the SB........even though it doesn't mean shit?
1
Quote Originally Posted by skn02:
what revenge are you talking about, lol it was a completely different team with zero personnel related, no players or coaches from either of those teams in that superbowl, what revenge???? Seahawks might loook better on paper but none of the players or coaches will feel there's a need or be extra motivated to avenge that loss, lol
With all that you said, you don't think the media will jump all over that angle, and push it down are throats leading up to the SB........even though it doesn't mean shit?
which is exactly what i mean, lol it doesnt mean anything even if they push the narrative harder, players dont have that burning desire to "revenge", they didnt feel that pain as players, not part of the team that had the devastating loss. Usually the so called revenge angle happen like the spurs that lost to heat in a devastating fashion and they played the whole year with a chip on shoulder and crushed the heat when they rematch in a "revenge". I don't see that particular case here at all.
1
@Cooler999
which is exactly what i mean, lol it doesnt mean anything even if they push the narrative harder, players dont have that burning desire to "revenge", they didnt feel that pain as players, not part of the team that had the devastating loss. Usually the so called revenge angle happen like the spurs that lost to heat in a devastating fashion and they played the whole year with a chip on shoulder and crushed the heat when they rematch in a "revenge". I don't see that particular case here at all.
Quote Originally Posted by tbogie1: @RayRayK Wilson shouldn't even be talked about here. Pete Carroll got cute and decided to pass instead of giving the ball to Marshon Lynch at the 1 yard line. Dumbest call ever It wasn't a too bad of call. It was BAD execution by Wilson. He hesitated a bit before throwing that ball which allowed Butler to get in position for INT. Had he thrown it a bit sooner, it would have been a TD. And true, give Marshawn 3 tries, I am sure he would have scored. But Wilson was the darling in Pete Carroll's eyes, so he made that call to give Wilson a chance at the MVP. Had Wilson thrown that TD, he would have been the MVP. As opposed to giving the ball to Marshawn, if Marshawn scored then Marshawn would be the presumptive MVP.
Probably they wanted a TD in a nice fashion way but ended up choking
0
Quote Originally Posted by seattleseahawks:
Quote Originally Posted by tbogie1: @RayRayK Wilson shouldn't even be talked about here. Pete Carroll got cute and decided to pass instead of giving the ball to Marshon Lynch at the 1 yard line. Dumbest call ever It wasn't a too bad of call. It was BAD execution by Wilson. He hesitated a bit before throwing that ball which allowed Butler to get in position for INT. Had he thrown it a bit sooner, it would have been a TD. And true, give Marshawn 3 tries, I am sure he would have scored. But Wilson was the darling in Pete Carroll's eyes, so he made that call to give Wilson a chance at the MVP. Had Wilson thrown that TD, he would have been the MVP. As opposed to giving the ball to Marshawn, if Marshawn scored then Marshawn would be the presumptive MVP.
Probably they wanted a TD in a nice fashion way but ended up choking
what revenge are you talking about, lol it was a completely different team with zero personnel related, no players or coaches from either of those teams in that superbowl, what revenge???? Seahawks might loook better on paper but none of the players or coaches will feel there's a need or be extra motivated to avenge that loss, lol
Certainly it would be revenge for the Seattle fanbase. The fans are the only ones who truly care or so it seems to me. Of course the players who participated in that Superbowl years ago have moved on but that painful loss is still a part of Seahawks franchise history.
Anyone who promotes any form of censorship is an enemy of human freedom.
0
Quote Originally Posted by skn02:
what revenge are you talking about, lol it was a completely different team with zero personnel related, no players or coaches from either of those teams in that superbowl, what revenge???? Seahawks might loook better on paper but none of the players or coaches will feel there's a need or be extra motivated to avenge that loss, lol
Certainly it would be revenge for the Seattle fanbase. The fans are the only ones who truly care or so it seems to me. Of course the players who participated in that Superbowl years ago have moved on but that painful loss is still a part of Seahawks franchise history.
We see where Pete is now…. How ….was Pete Carroll a genius in this arena 10 years ago…. Fired in one year these days…. Makes no sense…. Doesn’t have to …raiders were very poor this year… all signs to me say Seattle… patriots lost to Pete Carroll game one of this year if memory serves….
0
We see where Pete is now…. How ….was Pete Carroll a genius in this arena 10 years ago…. Fired in one year these days…. Makes no sense…. Doesn’t have to …raiders were very poor this year… all signs to me say Seattle… patriots lost to Pete Carroll game one of this year if memory serves….
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.