BILLS -------> Boy I Love Losing Superbowls ![]()
I’ll tell you how I really feel. Cooks fumble costed them the game. But the refs costed them the game twice at the end. And Bo Nix broke his ankle. So at least the Broncos won’t go to the Super Bowl now
thankfully
I’ll tell you how I really feel. Cooks fumble costed them the game. But the refs costed them the game twice at the end. And Bo Nix broke his ankle. So at least the Broncos won’t go to the Super Bowl now
thankfully
Even if Josh Allen is to win a SuperBowl in the future he will always be trash. Losing to a 2nd year player with a Broken ankle will allow Destroy his Legacy moving forward. Cant just blame his WR's or the Refs. The guy is a Busted Rubber thst went to Wyoming. He will NEVER amount to anything.
Even if Josh Allen is to win a SuperBowl in the future he will always be trash. Losing to a 2nd year player with a Broken ankle will allow Destroy his Legacy moving forward. Cant just blame his WR's or the Refs. The guy is a Busted Rubber thst went to Wyoming. He will NEVER amount to anything.
When the Bills & Allen continue to lose to Mahomes & the Chiefs 0-4 in playoffs, there is no SB ring awaiting. Most thought since Chiefs were out of the playoffs, it was Allens year to win. The Bills are destined to never win a SB.
When the Bills & Allen continue to lose to Mahomes & the Chiefs 0-4 in playoffs, there is no SB ring awaiting. Most thought since Chiefs were out of the playoffs, it was Allens year to win. The Bills are destined to never win a SB.
@jpot34
It wasn't an interception. He was already down on the ground when the ball was stolen. Refs do it again.
It would have been an EASY TD if Allen hadn't underthrown his receiver. The receiver had a step on the defender - hit him in stride, and it's a TD. That said, officials redefine "catch" however they want. The receiver caught the ball, and the defender had his hands NEAR the ball when the receiver fell to the ground. Then, AFTER the player was on the ground, the defender snatched the ball away. In a traditional call, that's a "catch," and the receiver is down by contact before the ball is snatched away. In the new NFL, it's whatever they want it to be.
@jpot34
It wasn't an interception. He was already down on the ground when the ball was stolen. Refs do it again.
It would have been an EASY TD if Allen hadn't underthrown his receiver. The receiver had a step on the defender - hit him in stride, and it's a TD. That said, officials redefine "catch" however they want. The receiver caught the ball, and the defender had his hands NEAR the ball when the receiver fell to the ground. Then, AFTER the player was on the ground, the defender snatched the ball away. In a traditional call, that's a "catch," and the receiver is down by contact before the ball is snatched away. In the new NFL, it's whatever they want it to be.
@PhillyPhilly
well his 4 turnovers really hurt but my biggest beef is why didn't the referees stop play on the INT in OT and do an official challenge to get it right? And I think that coaches should be allowed 1 challenge in OT. Too much is at stake to not be 100% correct. The referees just flossed over this play and Denver went to continue play. Absolutely pathetic when the Monday morning talk shows will talk about these blunders that did effect the game and not the play on the field.
@PhillyPhilly
well his 4 turnovers really hurt but my biggest beef is why didn't the referees stop play on the INT in OT and do an official challenge to get it right? And I think that coaches should be allowed 1 challenge in OT. Too much is at stake to not be 100% correct. The referees just flossed over this play and Denver went to continue play. Absolutely pathetic when the Monday morning talk shows will talk about these blunders that did effect the game and not the play on the field.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.