Posted:
#76
What book was this placed with? I would totally hedge too....
0
55k parlay depends on Pittsburgh ml!
Posted:
#79
Ni offense Panda, but based upon some of your previous dealings, it's tough for me to buy this.
You are the same guy that posted your $22.000 bet on Nevada in your Game of the Year that lost and got called out for the time stamp on it because it stated it was made at 21:50am and were told that marine time doesn't have am/pm and 21:50am wouldn't exist anyway because 21:50 is at night.
Then you started a thread about your play on Ball State/Tulsa bolw game with 7 reasons why Ball would win and 5 of the reasons you stated were completely wrong and based upon totally erroneous statistics and concepts. Then you tried to explain that you were using just road stats because the game was a road game for both teams and explained that every big gambler in Vegas knows that bowl games are road games for both teams, which is the silliest thing I ever heard. Needless to say, if you look back on your faulty premises on that game, you couldn't have been further off in your statements in that game (i.e., stating that Ball had a huge rushing advantage (which was totally contrary to the stats) and it turned out to be the most lopsided rushing disparity in rushing yards in a bowl game in three years as Tulsa outrushed Ball by about 300 yards. We are all often wrong in our analysis, but the point is your analysis was based upon completely faulty information and every gambler knows bowl games are not road games for each team.
My point is, it is tough to take you seriously when you post tickets like this. By chance you have a ticket such as this or anything close, you would clearly take Artizona +7 for some of it to lock in a profit and shoot for a middle.
You are the same guy that posted your $22.000 bet on Nevada in your Game of the Year that lost and got called out for the time stamp on it because it stated it was made at 21:50am and were told that marine time doesn't have am/pm and 21:50am wouldn't exist anyway because 21:50 is at night.
Then you started a thread about your play on Ball State/Tulsa bolw game with 7 reasons why Ball would win and 5 of the reasons you stated were completely wrong and based upon totally erroneous statistics and concepts. Then you tried to explain that you were using just road stats because the game was a road game for both teams and explained that every big gambler in Vegas knows that bowl games are road games for both teams, which is the silliest thing I ever heard. Needless to say, if you look back on your faulty premises on that game, you couldn't have been further off in your statements in that game (i.e., stating that Ball had a huge rushing advantage (which was totally contrary to the stats) and it turned out to be the most lopsided rushing disparity in rushing yards in a bowl game in three years as Tulsa outrushed Ball by about 300 yards. We are all often wrong in our analysis, but the point is your analysis was based upon completely faulty information and every gambler knows bowl games are not road games for each team.
My point is, it is tough to take you seriously when you post tickets like this. By chance you have a ticket such as this or anything close, you would clearly take Artizona +7 for some of it to lock in a profit and shoot for a middle.
0
Posted:
#82
Quote Originally Posted by GameHunter:
Ni offense Panda, but based upon some of your previous dealings, it's tough for me to buy this.
You are the same guy that posted your $22.000 bet on Nevada in your Game of the Year that lost and got called out for the time stamp on it because it stated it was made at 21:50am and were told that marine time doesn't have am/pm and 21:50am wouldn't exist anyway because 21:50 is at night.
Then you started a thread about your play on Ball State/Tulsa bolw game with 7 reasons why Ball would win and 5 of the reasons you stated were completely wrong and based upon totally erroneous statistics and concepts. Then you tried to explain that you were using just road stats because the game was a road game for both teams and explained that every big gambler in Vegas knows that bowl games are road games for both teams, which is the silliest thing I ever heard. Needless to say, if you look back on your faulty premises on that game, you couldn't have been further off in your statements in that game (i.e., stating that Ball had a huge rushing advantage (which was totally contrary to the stats) and it turned out to be the most lopsided rushing disparity in rushing yards in a bowl game in three years as Tulsa outrushed Ball by about 300 yards. We are all often wrong in our analysis, but the point is your analysis was based upon completely faulty information and every gambler knows bowl games are not road games for each team.
My point is, it is tough to take you seriously when you post tickets like this. By chance you have a ticket such as this or anything close, you would clearly take Artizona +7 for some of it to lock in a profit and shoot for a middle.
Ni offense Panda, but based upon some of your previous dealings, it's tough for me to buy this.
You are the same guy that posted your $22.000 bet on Nevada in your Game of the Year that lost and got called out for the time stamp on it because it stated it was made at 21:50am and were told that marine time doesn't have am/pm and 21:50am wouldn't exist anyway because 21:50 is at night.
Then you started a thread about your play on Ball State/Tulsa bolw game with 7 reasons why Ball would win and 5 of the reasons you stated were completely wrong and based upon totally erroneous statistics and concepts. Then you tried to explain that you were using just road stats because the game was a road game for both teams and explained that every big gambler in Vegas knows that bowl games are road games for both teams, which is the silliest thing I ever heard. Needless to say, if you look back on your faulty premises on that game, you couldn't have been further off in your statements in that game (i.e., stating that Ball had a huge rushing advantage (which was totally contrary to the stats) and it turned out to be the most lopsided rushing disparity in rushing yards in a bowl game in three years as Tulsa outrushed Ball by about 300 yards. We are all often wrong in our analysis, but the point is your analysis was based upon completely faulty information and every gambler knows bowl games are not road games for each team.
My point is, it is tough to take you seriously when you post tickets like this. By chance you have a ticket such as this or anything close, you would clearly take Artizona +7 for some of it to lock in a profit and shoot for a middle.
0
Posted:
#83
HEDGE ZONA + THE POINTS FOR $25k. YOU WOULD BE GUARANTEED AT LEAST 25K AND YOU HAVE A CHANCE TO WIN 80K IF PITT WINS, BUT DOESN'T COVER.
ZONA WINS STRAIGHT UP YOU WIN 25K ON THE BET AND LOSE $500 FROM THE PARLAY
PITT WINS BY 6 OR LESS YOU WIN 80K BECUASE YOU WIN THE PARLAY AND YOU COVER THE 25K FROM YOUR ZONA BET
PITT WINS AND COVERS YOU WOULD STILL WIN 25K BECASUE YOU LOSE THE ZONA BET
THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT THIS IS THE WAY TO GO ON THIS.
0
Posted:
#88
Quote Originally Posted by sinkhole1:
why did u evet put pittsburg in the parlay if u are going to hedge?
why did u evet put pittsburg in the parlay if u are going to hedge?
I have a similar (but not quite as fruitful) conundrum myself. I made the parlay bets with the intent of hedging...
Anygame played with a ball can hinge on quirky bounces.... Have you seen the shape of a football?
It'd be downright idiotic not to hedge.
oh and I forgot to mention......How SWEEEEEET it is, RedPanda.
...... etc,
0
yeah right....
Posted:
#91
I've been on here for a long time but this is my first post. What wax said is the right thing to do. Don't take Arizona on the ml because then you're gauranteed to lose one of the bets. Take them with the points and hope you middle it, and if you don't the worst you end up with is 25k or better. I'm sure almost all of us on here would love to have that problem. Unless you're loaded and these amounts don't matter to you then you really should hedge it. You would be really sick if you had the chance for 55k and ended up a nickle in the red.
amounts don't matter to you then you really should hedge it. You would be really sick if you had the chance for 55k and ended up a nickle in the red.0
Posted:
#99
Nice one vtec. 
Looks like you've been studying up on how to make the big bucks via the esteemed redpanda.
You're gonna' hedge that, right?
Here's my easy winner:
Looks like you've been studying up on how to make the big bucks via the esteemed redpanda.
You're gonna' hedge that, right?
Here's my easy winner:
Wager type : Parlay
Select #1 : NFL Football (Pittsburgh Steelers vs Arizona Cardinals - Super Bowl XLIII - Raymond James Stadium - Tampa, FL - live IN GAME betting during every commerial break)
Pittsburgh Steelers 2/1/2009 6:20 PM - (EST)
Spread -9½ +137 for Game
Select #2 : WNCAA Basketball (NCAA Division I Women's National Championship - winner)
Field wins Women's Championship 2/7/2009 12:00 PM - (EST)
Money Line +235 for Game
Select #3 : Cricket Other Sports (England at West Indies - 1st Test)
West Indies wins 1st test 2/4/2009 10:00 AM - (EST)
Money Line +250 for Game
Select #4 : Lotto Other Sports (Mega Millions Jackpot winner - Tuesday, February 03rd, 2009)
Mega Millions Jackpot Winner 02/03 2/3/2009 10:30 PM - (EST)
Money Line +600 for Game
Select #5 : Lotto Other Sports (Powerball Jackpot winner - Wednesday, February 04th, 2009)
Powerball Jackpot Winner 02/04 2/4/2009 10:30 PM - (EST)
Money Line +555 for Game
Amount : Risking 1,000.00 To Win 500,000.00 USD
0
Hot Forum Topics
