Sep 4 Dallas at Philly
Philly -7 no answer for saquon
under 46.5 elite Philly defense
regular season wins
kc over 11.5
philly under 11.5
minn under 8.5 [+130]
buff over 11.5 [-160]
wash over 9.5 [-120]
green bay over 9.5 [-120]
la chargers over 9.5
Cleveland under 4.5 [+140]
tenn under 5.5 [+125]
ny giants under 5.5 [-145]
new england under 8.5 [-140]
las vegas under 6.5 [+125]
Jacksonville under 7.5
regular season wins
kc over 11.5
philly under 11.5
minn under 8.5 [+130]
buff over 11.5 [-160]
wash over 9.5 [-120]
green bay over 9.5 [-120]
la chargers over 9.5
Cleveland under 4.5 [+140]
tenn under 5.5 [+125]
ny giants under 5.5 [-145]
new england under 8.5 [-140]
las vegas under 6.5 [+125]
Jacksonville under 7.5
week=1 and season>2013 and HF and tpS(playoffs)!=1 and tpS(playoffs)!=3 and tpS(W)>7 and -9.5<line<-4
Last 11 years, big trend AGAINST Philly
(3-16) ATS. I will be taking the points.........................gl
week=1 and season>2013 and HF and tpS(playoffs)!=1 and tpS(playoffs)!=3 and tpS(W)>7 and -9.5<line<-4
Last 11 years, big trend AGAINST Philly
(3-16) ATS. I will be taking the points.........................gl
[Quote: Originally Posted by jowchoo]Quote Originally Posted by maxwagers781: Sep 4 Dallas at Philly Philly -7 no answer for saquon under 46.5 elite Philly defense week=1 and season>2013 and HF and tpS(playoffs)!=1 and tpS(playoffs)!=3 and tpS(W)>7 and -9.5
cowboys only have one win and cover at phi in recent years. but divisional games hit different. and it's a clean slate for all.
[Quote: Originally Posted by jowchoo]Quote Originally Posted by maxwagers781: Sep 4 Dallas at Philly Philly -7 no answer for saquon under 46.5 elite Philly defense week=1 and season>2013 and HF and tpS(playoffs)!=1 and tpS(playoffs)!=3 and tpS(W)>7 and -9.5
cowboys only have one win and cover at phi in recent years. but divisional games hit different. and it's a clean slate for all.
Yes, if I use DIV in the query the result comes (1-5) this small sample size would still take me off the Eagles and make the
Cowboys a strong teaser candidate.....................................gl
Yes, if I use DIV in the query the result comes (1-5) this small sample size would still take me off the Eagles and make the
Cowboys a strong teaser candidate.....................................gl
@jowchoo
week=1 and HF and tpS(playoffs)!=1 and tpS(playoffs)!=3 and tpS(W)>7 and season>2013 and line<-4 and o:points<23.
First of all use my trend it would be nice to pass on credit.
2nd you bet teasers so the line you will have is not relevant to him.
3rd of all Dallas must score 23 points or more so if they dont the query is 50/50 against the regular line.
You tie this into another game with minus juice to get paid.
You're going to win this one because of the teaser but to make a comment on his wagers is not congruent.
You have no business in others threads combating their games when they bet lines without adding additional points using teasers. SMH
@jowchoo
week=1 and HF and tpS(playoffs)!=1 and tpS(playoffs)!=3 and tpS(W)>7 and season>2013 and line<-4 and o:points<23.
First of all use my trend it would be nice to pass on credit.
2nd you bet teasers so the line you will have is not relevant to him.
3rd of all Dallas must score 23 points or more so if they dont the query is 50/50 against the regular line.
You tie this into another game with minus juice to get paid.
You're going to win this one because of the teaser but to make a comment on his wagers is not congruent.
You have no business in others threads combating their games when they bet lines without adding additional points using teasers. SMH
This is a good proposal for the NFL playoff format. Reseeding should matter. Better teams shouldn't have to play on the road in the postseason against a host team with fewer wins.
This is a good proposal for the NFL playoff format. Reseeding should matter. Better teams shouldn't have to play on the road in the postseason against a host team with fewer wins.
[Quote: Originally Posted by maxwagers781] This is a good proposal for the NFL playoff format. Reseeding should matter. Better teams shouldn't have to play on the road in the postseason against a (Division Winning) host team with fewer wins. story in link[/Quote]
I disagree... and I hope the owners realize they are "neutering" Division Winners if they go forward with this proposal.
If this is truly the direction we're going w/ things , then why not just have an AFC Conference and an NFC Conference (with no divisions), and let the top 7 teams in each Conference go to the playoffs. Top Teams get HFA. Problem solved.. Frankly, I'm surprised the owners didn't torpedo this nonsense and bring up this argument, when it was first brought up by the Lions.
We shouldn't be rewarding Wildcard Teams. We should be telling Wildcard Teams if they want home field to win the Division !!
[Quote: Originally Posted by maxwagers781] This is a good proposal for the NFL playoff format. Reseeding should matter. Better teams shouldn't have to play on the road in the postseason against a (Division Winning) host team with fewer wins. story in link[/Quote]
I disagree... and I hope the owners realize they are "neutering" Division Winners if they go forward with this proposal.
If this is truly the direction we're going w/ things , then why not just have an AFC Conference and an NFC Conference (with no divisions), and let the top 7 teams in each Conference go to the playoffs. Top Teams get HFA. Problem solved.. Frankly, I'm surprised the owners didn't torpedo this nonsense and bring up this argument, when it was first brought up by the Lions.
We shouldn't be rewarding Wildcard Teams. We should be telling Wildcard Teams if they want home field to win the Division !!
[Quote: Originally Posted by spottie2935]Quote Originally Posted by maxwagers781: Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: Quote Originally Posted by maxwagers781: Sep 4 Dallas at Philly Philly -7 no answer for saquon under 46.5 elite Philly defense week=1 and season>2013 and HF and tpS(playoffs)!=1 and tpS(playoffs)!=3 and tpS(W)>7 and -9.5 cowboys only have one win and cover at phi in recent years. but divisional games hit different. and it's a clean slate for all. Yes, if I use DIV in the query the result comes (1-5) this small sample size would still take me off the Eagles and make the Cowboys a strong teaser candidate.....................................gl @jowchoo i always go to those 6-team teasers for plus money @jowchoo odds not as good as it use to be falcons +7.5 browns +11.5 comm -1 jets +9 broncos -1.5 seahawks +7.5@jowchoo week=1 and HF and tpS(playoffs)!=1 and tpS(playoffs)!=3 and tpS(W)>7 and season>2013 and line<-4 and o:points<23. First of all use my trend it would be nice to pass on credit. 2nd you bet teasers so the line you will have is not relevant to him. 3rd of all Dallas must score 23 points or more so if they dont the query is 50/50 against the regular line. You tie this into another game with minus juice to get paid. You're going to win this one because of the teaser but to make a comment on his wagers is not congruent. You have no business in others threads combating their :
Your wagering analysis is useless due to your tunnel vision and insecurities.
Your lack of knowledge on bet sizing and ROI is a dead giveaway.
Since this is NOT your thread, open season on your laughable sense of self importance.
Your rants are incoherent and baseless.
Care to play some chess?
[Quote: Originally Posted by spottie2935]Quote Originally Posted by maxwagers781: Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: Quote Originally Posted by maxwagers781: Sep 4 Dallas at Philly Philly -7 no answer for saquon under 46.5 elite Philly defense week=1 and season>2013 and HF and tpS(playoffs)!=1 and tpS(playoffs)!=3 and tpS(W)>7 and -9.5 cowboys only have one win and cover at phi in recent years. but divisional games hit different. and it's a clean slate for all. Yes, if I use DIV in the query the result comes (1-5) this small sample size would still take me off the Eagles and make the Cowboys a strong teaser candidate.....................................gl @jowchoo i always go to those 6-team teasers for plus money @jowchoo odds not as good as it use to be falcons +7.5 browns +11.5 comm -1 jets +9 broncos -1.5 seahawks +7.5@jowchoo week=1 and HF and tpS(playoffs)!=1 and tpS(playoffs)!=3 and tpS(W)>7 and season>2013 and line<-4 and o:points<23. First of all use my trend it would be nice to pass on credit. 2nd you bet teasers so the line you will have is not relevant to him. 3rd of all Dallas must score 23 points or more so if they dont the query is 50/50 against the regular line. You tie this into another game with minus juice to get paid. You're going to win this one because of the teaser but to make a comment on his wagers is not congruent. You have no business in others threads combating their :
Your wagering analysis is useless due to your tunnel vision and insecurities.
Your lack of knowledge on bet sizing and ROI is a dead giveaway.
Since this is NOT your thread, open season on your laughable sense of self importance.
Your rants are incoherent and baseless.
Care to play some chess?
Your wagering analysis is useless due to your tunnel vision and insecurities.
Your lack of knowledge on bet sizing and ROI is a dead giveaway.
Since this is NOT your thread, open season on your laughable sense of self importance.
Your rants are incoherent and baseless.
Care to play some chess?
This was intended for snottie!
Your wagering analysis is useless due to your tunnel vision and insecurities.
Your lack of knowledge on bet sizing and ROI is a dead giveaway.
Since this is NOT your thread, open season on your laughable sense of self importance.
Your rants are incoherent and baseless.
Care to play some chess?
This was intended for snottie!
@Rush51
Take last season for example. The playoffs showcased 3 teams win better overall records playing on the road in the Wildcard against division winners with fewer wins. The Vikings, Commanders, and Chargers deserved to play a home game in that round because they won more games than their opponent, but played in a division with a winning team with more wins than them. With their number of wins, they could've won in any other division.
Look at the division winners with 10-7 records. The play in the division is sub-par to the rest of the league and you could back your way into the playoffs. For the most part, the rest of the division had sub .500 records. It would be hard to argue that either the Texans or Rams played well during the regular season and deserved a home playoff game.
@Rush51
Take last season for example. The playoffs showcased 3 teams win better overall records playing on the road in the Wildcard against division winners with fewer wins. The Vikings, Commanders, and Chargers deserved to play a home game in that round because they won more games than their opponent, but played in a division with a winning team with more wins than them. With their number of wins, they could've won in any other division.
Look at the division winners with 10-7 records. The play in the division is sub-par to the rest of the league and you could back your way into the playoffs. For the most part, the rest of the division had sub .500 records. It would be hard to argue that either the Texans or Rams played well during the regular season and deserved a home playoff game.
some more offseason news with stefon diggs. its official that he and cardi b are romantically involved in new england. without cardi b the world wouldn't be where it is right now- she's a true pioneer in the society we live in. and with out stefon diggs that new england wide receiver situation room is a dumpster fire the likes no ones ever seen before
some more offseason news with stefon diggs. its official that he and cardi b are romantically involved in new england. without cardi b the world wouldn't be where it is right now- she's a true pioneer in the society we live in. and with out stefon diggs that new england wide receiver situation room is a dumpster fire the likes no ones ever seen before
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.