Done some significant research on TOM (turnover margins) that suggests the outliers + or - (10 or more) in net turnovers are +EV to regress the following year. Where you can find this years win total going the opposite way triggers a +EV play. BUFF/LAC/PHIL had their win totals increase despite their massive TOM JAX/TENN/CLEV had their win totals decrease despite their horrendous TOM I will throw a 1.5% play on; BUFF under 11.5 LAC under 9.5 PHIL under 11.5 JAX over 7.5 TENN over 5.5 CLEV over 4.5
@ jowchoo
You most of liked that query I had with the (TO). Think I got another one for you, will get back to ya.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
Done some significant research on TOM (turnover margins) that suggests the outliers + or - (10 or more) in net turnovers are +EV to regress the following year. Where you can find this years win total going the opposite way triggers a +EV play. BUFF/LAC/PHIL had their win totals increase despite their massive TOM JAX/TENN/CLEV had their win totals decrease despite their horrendous TOM I will throw a 1.5% play on; BUFF under 11.5 LAC under 9.5 PHIL under 11.5 JAX over 7.5 TENN over 5.5 CLEV over 4.5
@ jowchoo
You most of liked that query I had with the (TO). Think I got another one for you, will get back to ya.
Done some significant research on TOM (turnover margins) that suggests the outliers + or - (10 or more) in net turnovers are +EV to regress the following year. Where you can find this years win total going the opposite way triggers a +EV play. BUFF/LAC/PHIL had their win totals increase despite their massive TOM JAX/TENN/CLEV had their win totals decrease despite their horrendous TOM I will throw a 1.5% play on; BUFF under 11.5 LAC under 9.5 PHIL under 11.5 JAX over 7.5 TENN over 5.5 CLEV over 4.5
Cancelling the UNDER 11.5 BUFFALO wins.
This season has me more invested in FUTURES than at any time in last 10 years!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
Done some significant research on TOM (turnover margins) that suggests the outliers + or - (10 or more) in net turnovers are +EV to regress the following year. Where you can find this years win total going the opposite way triggers a +EV play. BUFF/LAC/PHIL had their win totals increase despite their massive TOM JAX/TENN/CLEV had their win totals decrease despite their horrendous TOM I will throw a 1.5% play on; BUFF under 11.5 LAC under 9.5 PHIL under 11.5 JAX over 7.5 TENN over 5.5 CLEV over 4.5
Cancelling the UNDER 11.5 BUFFALO wins.
This season has me more invested in FUTURES than at any time in last 10 years!!
You may win your over bets, but it's not due to some "regression to the mean." If you had the same bozos throwing the football for CLE, JAX, TEN this year as you did for the majority of last year, well, you'd likely have more dismal performance, and bad TO margins. And what do bad TO margins lead to ? More losses. Do you really think of winning football when you have DTR, Jameis Winston, Mac Jones, Will Levis, and Mason Rudolph leading the charge ?
What's ironic is that you may win your bets , but you're completely disregarding how the incoming QBs influence these TO outcomes. And TEN looks most problematic , because you are guaranteed to start a rookie QB mated to a poorly run franchise, with an unimpressive head coach in Callahan.
1
You may win your over bets, but it's not due to some "regression to the mean." If you had the same bozos throwing the football for CLE, JAX, TEN this year as you did for the majority of last year, well, you'd likely have more dismal performance, and bad TO margins. And what do bad TO margins lead to ? More losses. Do you really think of winning football when you have DTR, Jameis Winston, Mac Jones, Will Levis, and Mason Rudolph leading the charge ?
What's ironic is that you may win your bets , but you're completely disregarding how the incoming QBs influence these TO outcomes. And TEN looks most problematic , because you are guaranteed to start a rookie QB mated to a poorly run franchise, with an unimpressive head coach in Callahan.
Also, just a note when it comes to Turnover Margins. Certainly, the defense plays a part in the final result, but I put a greater premium on the QB's performance that influences the final outcome.
1
Also, just a note when it comes to Turnover Margins. Certainly, the defense plays a part in the final result, but I put a greater premium on the QB's performance that influences the final outcome.
Last season HOU had the #4-rated passing DEF according to NFL.com. If they have improved their horrible OFF line, C.J. Stroud could bounce back and HOU might surprise. That off-year provides a juicy price.
Good luck.
1
Last season HOU had the #4-rated passing DEF according to NFL.com. If they have improved their horrible OFF line, C.J. Stroud could bounce back and HOU might surprise. That off-year provides a juicy price.
I like Atlanta to win the NFC South. I think we've seen Baker's ceiling. We don't know what Penix's is yet. Could be lower than those first few games he played, but what if it's much higher?
1
I like Atlanta to win the NFC South. I think we've seen Baker's ceiling. We don't know what Penix's is yet. Could be lower than those first few games he played, but what if it's much higher?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.