72-50 +2054
ATL +7 -115 +6.5 -101
PIT +6 -104
PIT O43 -113
CIN +6 -101
NYJ +2.5 +104 / ml +130
NYJ O41 -107
NO +8.5 -104
JAX +110
AZ +10 -104
AZ U48 -112
CH +7 -108
72-50 +2054
ATL +7 -115 +6.5 -101
PIT +6 -104
PIT O43 -113
CIN +6 -101
NYJ +2.5 +104 / ml +130
NYJ O41 -107
NO +8.5 -104
JAX +110
AZ +10 -104
AZ U48 -112
CH +7 -108
72-50 +2054
ATL +7 -115 +6.5 -101
PIT +6 -104
PIT O43 -113
CIN +6 -101
NYJ +2.5 +104 / ml +130
NYJ O41 -107
NO +8.5 -104
JAX +110
AZ +10 -104
AZ U48 -112
CH +7 -108
@Raiders22
Dogs barking again this week?!?
Did some “advanced research” (lol assuming that I interpreted it correctly) this week and I predicted you would be on NO and AZ. GL brother ![]()
@Raiders22
Dogs barking again this week?!?
Did some “advanced research” (lol assuming that I interpreted it correctly) this week and I predicted you would be on NO and AZ. GL brother ![]()
@brn2loslive2win
Yeah. TB and LAR are both huge public plays also. But the public is right sometimes.
I played some favorites very early and some totals very early but the lines have moved way in my favor, so I did not post them.
![]()
@brn2loslive2win
Yeah. TB and LAR are both huge public plays also. But the public is right sometimes.
I played some favorites very early and some totals very early but the lines have moved way in my favor, so I did not post them.
![]()
@Raiders22
Tough to pull the trigger on NO or AZ. But looking carefully at the data on NFELOAPP, there is definitely indication that those lines are too high. NO and TB are almost identical on defense by those metrics. The question is whether or not the TB offense will outperform the NO defense by enough points to cover.
Using the eye test I can’t justify NO. I watched the game against MIA last week and that was a borderline blowout. The final score was not an indication of how the game was played. I was on NO along with you and felt it took a lot of luck to get that cover. That said, you’re probably right and NO is the right side today.
@Raiders22
Tough to pull the trigger on NO or AZ. But looking carefully at the data on NFELOAPP, there is definitely indication that those lines are too high. NO and TB are almost identical on defense by those metrics. The question is whether or not the TB offense will outperform the NO defense by enough points to cover.
Using the eye test I can’t justify NO. I watched the game against MIA last week and that was a borderline blowout. The final score was not an indication of how the game was played. I was on NO along with you and felt it took a lot of luck to get that cover. That said, you’re probably right and NO is the right side today.
@brn2loslive2win
All true. I did not want those teams at the open. But now the numbers are so high I feel they are worth it.
But NO has a terrible offense for sure. The Rams defense will be in shutdown mode after last week's letdown.
![]()
@brn2loslive2win
All true. I did not want those teams at the open. But now the numbers are so high I feel they are worth it.
But NO has a terrible offense for sure. The Rams defense will be in shutdown mode after last week's letdown.
![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.