Listen, I had Mayo and Dudley getting to minutes too based on pre-game interviews. Dudley got none and Mayo was a goose egg in 6 minutes. Of course neither compare to Whiteside as a starter but that is a significant portion of my bench that basically didn't play and I had them more in than not (although never confirmed).
Still I'll take it, what can I say? I'm not gonna sit here and go "knew it all along!". I didn't.
Ya just gotta keep trusting folks. It took 3.5 quarters but the Bucks FINALLY got it together. 
College Gambler had a direct fade of this play and right now I don't know how he is handling these excruciating losses.
And this was the worst of the worst by far.
I feel terribly bad for him...honestly. This one was a dagger right through the heart with a twist and turn (maybe worse than the Spurs Cavs game where he had the Spurs).
I don't know how he is keeping his sanity going through this shi t.
Yes Liturgy, the Harvard game was gonna come to the wire (and did it ever) and this one couldn't be any closer. Did one go my way tonight? It sure did.
But it was a long time coming. Thanks for the true covers brothers who always stuck with me and the play. Ultimately, the Bucks used all 48 minutes to play to win...each and every 48 right down to the last tenth... 
And don't talk to me about "dumb luck" Wizard. Denver Jets INT's. Jags Giants greatest comebacks in the history of the franchise with turnovers. And several others I won't bore you with.
This is a BAD Bucks team and maybe a buzzer beater is just what the doctor ordered to get them in the playoffs.
I knew what I was dealing with taking MCW as I said in the OP. I thought I would get progress and like meloss said, I didn't just get regression, I got a total no show (1-4 4 pts). Thank god Bayless gave me something to make up for it.
So the comeback is just 'backdooring' it right? Yeah, the Heat put up 9. And the Bucks get no credit for the comeback? By the way, he put his bet in AFTER he read my write-up. Do I have proof he faded it? No. But of course it planted a seed for his play (and he most likely faded the play, with some of his own reasoning because he disagreed with the OP. That's the definition of fading. Anyhow, who cares. I wasn't playing against him. I was betting my own money).
We will take it and we knew it would be close. Nuff said.
Good to see ya prime.
The Talib pick was still worse than this IMO (I will die remembering that loss) but dollar for dollar, yes, this made up for that loss in my bankroll and that's all that matters.
So the comeback is just 'backdooring' it right? Yeah, the Heat put up 9. And the Bucks get no credit for the comeback? By the way, he put his bet in AFTER he read my write-up. Do I have proof he faded it? No. But of course it planted a seed for his play (and he most likely faded the play, with some of his own reasoning because he disagreed with the OP. That's the definition of fading. Anyhow, who cares. I wasn't playing against him. I was betting my own money).
Established in 1995,
Ok kid. You couldn't cap your way out of a wet paper bag.
Hot Forum Topics
