23-36-3, -1,071.83, - ROR -17.9% All that is official and will not be denied!
5/29/2026
F5 – Athletics +102 – Rodon/Severino (Game +125)
More later, but you better get this one before the A's go negative.
![]()
23-36-3, -1,071.83, - ROR -17.9% All that is official and will not be denied!
5/29/2026
F5 – Athletics +102 – Rodon/Severino (Game +125)
More later, but you better get this one before the A's go negative.
![]()
23-36-3, -1,071.83, - ROR -17.9% All that is official and will not be denied!
5/29/2026
F5 – Athletics +102 – Rodon/Severino (Game +125)
More later, but you better get this one before the A's go negative.
![]()
23-36-3, -1,071.83, - ROR -17.9% All that is official and will not be denied!
5/29/2026
F5 – Angels +123 – Urena/Martinez
Fortunes are turning again, as they always do, but the public has not caught the slight reversal of both these teams, and especially the quality work Urena has been doing. That is to be expected, with most concentration centered on the East Coast and winners overall. Rays are overvalued here.
F5 – Athletics +102 – Rodon/Severino (Game +125)
This one opened around +120, similar to the game line of -145, but like yours truly, some bettors noticed the distinct difference in 5 inning probability and drove the line down while I was out (sorry about that). Rodon and the Skankees do not hold a 5 inning advantage, but do warrant being the game favorite due to bullpens and the Yankees propensities for late scoring.
Play At Your Own Risk.
![]()
23-36-3, -1,071.83, - ROR -17.9% All that is official and will not be denied!
5/29/2026
F5 – Angels +123 – Urena/Martinez
Fortunes are turning again, as they always do, but the public has not caught the slight reversal of both these teams, and especially the quality work Urena has been doing. That is to be expected, with most concentration centered on the East Coast and winners overall. Rays are overvalued here.
F5 – Athletics +102 – Rodon/Severino (Game +125)
This one opened around +120, similar to the game line of -145, but like yours truly, some bettors noticed the distinct difference in 5 inning probability and drove the line down while I was out (sorry about that). Rodon and the Skankees do not hold a 5 inning advantage, but do warrant being the game favorite due to bullpens and the Yankees propensities for late scoring.
Play At Your Own Risk.
![]()
Not official but I'm also on CIN and LAA tonight
BOL Key ![]()
Not official but I'm also on CIN and LAA tonight
BOL Key ![]()
@barneybeans
Glad to hear that on LAA Barney, but Braves vs Paddack was too scary. Braves far and away the best road team in MLB this year. My shorts got a little tight considering that game. BOL to you though.
![]()
@barneybeans
Glad to hear that on LAA Barney, but Braves vs Paddack was too scary. Braves far and away the best road team in MLB this year. My shorts got a little tight considering that game. BOL to you though.
![]()
@CharlieKellyUO
Please don't respond to trolls in my thread. If they get the attention they crave they keep coming back; ignored and they tire of it. JMHO
![]()
@CharlieKellyUO
Please don't respond to trolls in my thread. If they get the attention they crave they keep coming back; ignored and they tire of it. JMHO
![]()
KeyElement, nobody here is doing any trolling. I was on the forums way back like in 2004 where there were a lot of popular posters like Rush and a few others. Guys like Vanzack and all those guys.
All I mentioned was the only few posters that I noticed that I noticed still posted from back then was Badlands and you. Badlands has always posted like 3000 plays a year. Are you aware of him? I'm close to 100% certain he isn't a winning player because he literally bets the entire card for every sport. My point here is you can't fade him because even if he goes 48%, you still are going to lose at 52% due to the juice. My point here to other posters here is you might be slightly profitable just fading Badlands but because of the juice, you won't be profitable much.
As for you, yes everything I said about you is based on what I noticed about your postings. You been posting on the MLB forum for many years and I recalled you didn't post for a while and then got posting again. I never recalled you ever posted a winning year in MLB season. I just thought that was simply amazing and thought someone could literally just fade your plays and be profitable. I didn't mean to offend you. Remember, most people who bet sports are going to lose. I was just surprised I never saw you posted a winning season in MLB.
All I recall when looking at your threads was your green money sign avatar and your win loss record and you always had a negative number and you always posted a negative ROR%.
Let me ask you this. Do you have any idea how many total MLB seasons you posted since you been here? I got to assume at least 10 seasons right? Because I visited this covers forum for many years. I think you probably had maybe 1 or 2 winning MLB seasons at the most and those were probably the few seasons I didn't visited this forum. There isn't a way to check for old threads.
KeyElement, nobody here is doing any trolling. I was on the forums way back like in 2004 where there were a lot of popular posters like Rush and a few others. Guys like Vanzack and all those guys.
All I mentioned was the only few posters that I noticed that I noticed still posted from back then was Badlands and you. Badlands has always posted like 3000 plays a year. Are you aware of him? I'm close to 100% certain he isn't a winning player because he literally bets the entire card for every sport. My point here is you can't fade him because even if he goes 48%, you still are going to lose at 52% due to the juice. My point here to other posters here is you might be slightly profitable just fading Badlands but because of the juice, you won't be profitable much.
As for you, yes everything I said about you is based on what I noticed about your postings. You been posting on the MLB forum for many years and I recalled you didn't post for a while and then got posting again. I never recalled you ever posted a winning year in MLB season. I just thought that was simply amazing and thought someone could literally just fade your plays and be profitable. I didn't mean to offend you. Remember, most people who bet sports are going to lose. I was just surprised I never saw you posted a winning season in MLB.
All I recall when looking at your threads was your green money sign avatar and your win loss record and you always had a negative number and you always posted a negative ROR%.
Let me ask you this. Do you have any idea how many total MLB seasons you posted since you been here? I got to assume at least 10 seasons right? Because I visited this covers forum for many years. I think you probably had maybe 1 or 2 winning MLB seasons at the most and those were probably the few seasons I didn't visited this forum. There isn't a way to check for old threads.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.