715-715 +1239
.5U CLV 1st5 -.5 -127
1.5U NYY U8 -104
2U TB -1 -128
CIN TT U3.5 -138
.5U LAD 1st5 -.5 -146
CHC 1st5 O4 -110
1.5U BOS +100
.5U SD TT U 6.5 -119
715-715 +1239
.5U CLV 1st5 -.5 -127
1.5U NYY U8 -104
2U TB -1 -128
CIN TT U3.5 -138
.5U LAD 1st5 -.5 -146
CHC 1st5 O4 -110
1.5U BOS +100
.5U SD TT U 6.5 -119
715-715 +1239
.5U CLV 1st5 -.5 -127
1.5U NYY U8 -104
2U TB -1 -128
CIN TT U3.5 -138
.5U LAD 1st5 -.5 -146
CHC 1st5 O4 -110
1.5U BOS +100
.5U SD TT U 6.5 -119
Kinda surprised Yanks TT is 4.5. I was expecting 5.5 against Zebby with a 5 ERA and the way the Twins have been playing With Yanks a -160 favorites. I was going to go under but.....4.5 with Judge back and Yanks maybe getting hot and Twins pitching like sh!t.......Meh
Kinda surprised Yanks TT is 4.5. I was expecting 5.5 against Zebby with a 5 ERA and the way the Twins have been playing With Yanks a -160 favorites. I was going to go under but.....4.5 with Judge back and Yanks maybe getting hot and Twins pitching like sh!t.......Meh
Yessir. I did consider that also. But at -110 the implied B/E is the 52.38%. It would need to be 55.4% to even be at a 3% edge.
Whereas, the NYY U8 -104 I make to be about a 4% edge because the win probability is close to 56%, etc., etc.
![]()
Yessir. I did consider that also. But at -110 the implied B/E is the 52.38%. It would need to be 55.4% to even be at a 3% edge.
Whereas, the NYY U8 -104 I make to be about a 4% edge because the win probability is close to 56%, etc., etc.
![]()
