I get where you are coming from with the comment, but I also have no problem personally with boiler-room.
Some of the best resources come from the oddest places. If someone can pitch in and make us some cash I am fine with the lack of commas or sentence structure.
I guess I am saying that everyone is welcome, barring attacking or assholes, I hope everyone welcomes everyone.
0
Gunners,
I get where you are coming from with the comment, but I also have no problem personally with boiler-room.
Some of the best resources come from the oddest places. If someone can pitch in and make us some cash I am fine with the lack of commas or sentence structure.
I guess I am saying that everyone is welcome, barring attacking or assholes, I hope everyone welcomes everyone.
bottom line ,i think fast ,talk fast and this is how it comes out,,just thoughts on a page.....especially during the day when im at work and am doing 100 things at once,,,just my hectic nature
0
bottom line ,i think fast ,talk fast and this is how it comes out,,just thoughts on a page.....especially during the day when im at work and am doing 100 things at once,,,just my hectic nature
Anyone else get the proxy material etc from Cardica today? I have leafed through it but not read carefully...if anyone did get it, let me know what you think if you feel like it...
0
I like it boiler room, keep em coming ...
Anyone else get the proxy material etc from Cardica today? I have leafed through it but not read carefully...if anyone did get it, let me know what you think if you feel like it...
I got the info in my email saying they had a meeting planned, but I didnt read further since after the meeting usually there is an Edgar filing and I can read up that way..
Lazy I know..
0
I got the info in my email saying they had a meeting planned, but I didnt read further since after the meeting usually there is an Edgar filing and I can read up that way..
Also, it is not really an easy ticker symbol to trade back and forth cause the moves up are drastic and severe right now.
I say buy it for the long haul, put it away, assess it later (unless it gets bought out-----then I'll most likely sell it and hope the premium is a nice gain).
Mid 12s now. I am hoping for 20ish by end of 2008 (on its own or from the buy out premium).
Cheers
0
Bottom line on CRDC is this, though:
Potential upside outweighs potential downside.
Also, it is not really an easy ticker symbol to trade back and forth cause the moves up are drastic and severe right now.
I say buy it for the long haul, put it away, assess it later (unless it gets bought out-----then I'll most likely sell it and hope the premium is a nice gain).
Mid 12s now. I am hoping for 20ish by end of 2008 (on its own or from the buy out premium).
Maybe boiler room is a descendant of Jack Kerouac or some Beat writer He may be producing a scroll, which is on display now soemwhere
not far off my friend,fast speedy writing,,lots of booze,,i may be a legend and not even know it,,,,,,haha,,,fuck all that ,had the over in the sox game ,,ring the cash register my friend
0
Quote Originally Posted by Vermeer:
PS
Maybe boiler room is a descendant of Jack Kerouac or some Beat writer He may be producing a scroll, which is on display now soemwhere
not far off my friend,fast speedy writing,,lots of booze,,i may be a legend and not even know it,,,,,,haha,,,fuck all that ,had the over in the sox game ,,ring the cash register my friend
I'm not taking a shot at you or anything. you seem like a nice guy. good luck to you, i'll probably still read a couple of your posts, but it might make my eyes pop out of my head
0
I'm not taking a shot at you or anything. you seem like a nice guy. good luck to you, i'll probably still read a couple of your posts, but it might make my eyes pop out of my head
Alright guys...Boiler I hope you don't work in one of said rooms...keep pounding the keyboard and the booze however and let fly...
Here is a little thing which causes some small worry...and more bets on alternative energy sources perhaps (oil sands have been good to canada and to me)...
A few days ago, Boone Pickens declared..
"The world hit peak oil last year [2006]"
And about the time ... the
German-based Energy Watch Group released a report that also
said oil peaked in 2006..... oil production will now
fall by 7% a year.
That means, that next year... oil production will decline by 5.9 million barrels per day.
"They talked like $50 was going to be difficult, and $60 and $70.
We went through those like a knife through hot butter.'' - Boone
Pickens, October 19, 2007
0
Alright guys...Boiler I hope you don't work in one of said rooms...keep pounding the keyboard and the booze however and let fly...
Here is a little thing which causes some small worry...and more bets on alternative energy sources perhaps (oil sands have been good to canada and to me)...
A few days ago, Boone Pickens declared..
"The world hit peak oil last year [2006]"
And about the time ... the
German-based Energy Watch Group released a report that also
said oil peaked in 2006..... oil production will now
fall by 7% a year.
That means, that next year... oil production will decline by 5.9 million barrels per day.
"They talked like $50 was going to be difficult, and $60 and $70.
We went through those like a knife through hot butter.'' - Boone
Pickens, October 19, 2007
Every time CRDC goes down I nibble a bit more...am in for the long run too CC
I was just getting ready to post something very similiar. The volume is sooooo low, it's creating some pretty big swings in the share price. If you like the stock, throw a series of bids out there, no matter how ridiculous, you just never know.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Vermeer:
Every time CRDC goes down I nibble a bit more...am in for the long run too CC
I was just getting ready to post something very similiar. The volume is sooooo low, it's creating some pretty big swings in the share price. If you like the stock, throw a series of bids out there, no matter how ridiculous, you just never know.
I watched that peak oil flick on Sundance last night and the show makes convincing arguments.
To me the only way we get oil prices down is by HUGE and I mean larger than Carter incentives for individuals and corporations to develop and purchase alt-energy products. Of course there is no way in hell it happens until Bush is out, and the best shot is if a DEM gets into office. The last time the US really invested and incentived alt energy, it drove oil right back down. Since Bush is pretty much in the pockets of the Saudis and oil companies we will have to wait, and waiting a year means we see oil over 100..
So keep buying solar companies.
0
Solars keep running..
STP and FSLR.
I watched that peak oil flick on Sundance last night and the show makes convincing arguments.
To me the only way we get oil prices down is by HUGE and I mean larger than Carter incentives for individuals and corporations to develop and purchase alt-energy products. Of course there is no way in hell it happens until Bush is out, and the best shot is if a DEM gets into office. The last time the US really invested and incentived alt energy, it drove oil right back down. Since Bush is pretty much in the pockets of the Saudis and oil companies we will have to wait, and waiting a year means we see oil over 100..
WSC we have been around this topic before, and I would strongly suggest that the significant change since the Carter years (and they, by the way, were terrible years, recall 14% prime rates??) is the emergence of China and India on the demand side of the equation.Completely different playing field than the 80s.The Chinese would gladly buy all Saudi reserves if they could.
That these countries come into prominence precisely at a time when supplies are getting harder to find/extricate truly exacerbates the problems already created by our stupid oil policies throughout the past 50 years.
Secondly, what specific incentives are you referring to that ""caused" oil prices to decline? I do not recall any. US legislation does not control oil prices. I wish it did, or could.
0
WSC we have been around this topic before, and I would strongly suggest that the significant change since the Carter years (and they, by the way, were terrible years, recall 14% prime rates??) is the emergence of China and India on the demand side of the equation.Completely different playing field than the 80s.The Chinese would gladly buy all Saudi reserves if they could.
That these countries come into prominence precisely at a time when supplies are getting harder to find/extricate truly exacerbates the problems already created by our stupid oil policies throughout the past 50 years.
Secondly, what specific incentives are you referring to that ""caused" oil prices to decline? I do not recall any. US legislation does not control oil prices. I wish it did, or could.
We need to MAKE huge incentives because you are right, we have none and China is chomping at the bit to get as much oil as possible.
That show on Sundance (or IFC?) was great..some insight about the oil dependance problem and how we might solve it.
After looking at the alternatives I see NONE outside solar, and wind..but wind isnt practical.
Nuclear is too costly and prohibitive and people dont like the reactor in the backyard (although when I lived in Philly I could see one looking out my front door, the reactor in Royersford)
Biofuel is a joke..too expensive
Sugar-fuel is too expensive..
Solar is IT..thats all I can see. The reason I say solar is because there are ways to cut cost and increase productivity by technology. I think nano-solar will eventually end up solving the problem, making more effective and space effective solutions..right now it is too expensive otherwise.
If I recall, back in the Carter years (I was a kiddo back then) there were some pretty heavy tax incentives, plus the tax code was different and people could form partnerships and investment groups and that was how many did this.
To me if you want to stop oil dependance then create a reason to do so...if you gave a monster tax break to people who put solar panels on home/business or monster incentives for ANY vehicle which had over 35 MPG, but more for the alt energy cars, then demand would increase, costs come down and innovation goes up.
Bush wants none of this..if Clinton were president (well oil wouldnt be at 80 if he was because Iraq would never have happened) these incentives would occur.
If we want to break dependance then we either have to drill our own in those reserve lands/Alaska or give corporations and individuals the reason to take the risk and innovate.
0
Vermeer,
We need to MAKE huge incentives because you are right, we have none and China is chomping at the bit to get as much oil as possible.
That show on Sundance (or IFC?) was great..some insight about the oil dependance problem and how we might solve it.
After looking at the alternatives I see NONE outside solar, and wind..but wind isnt practical.
Nuclear is too costly and prohibitive and people dont like the reactor in the backyard (although when I lived in Philly I could see one looking out my front door, the reactor in Royersford)
Biofuel is a joke..too expensive
Sugar-fuel is too expensive..
Solar is IT..thats all I can see. The reason I say solar is because there are ways to cut cost and increase productivity by technology. I think nano-solar will eventually end up solving the problem, making more effective and space effective solutions..right now it is too expensive otherwise.
If I recall, back in the Carter years (I was a kiddo back then) there were some pretty heavy tax incentives, plus the tax code was different and people could form partnerships and investment groups and that was how many did this.
To me if you want to stop oil dependance then create a reason to do so...if you gave a monster tax break to people who put solar panels on home/business or monster incentives for ANY vehicle which had over 35 MPG, but more for the alt energy cars, then demand would increase, costs come down and innovation goes up.
Bush wants none of this..if Clinton were president (well oil wouldnt be at 80 if he was because Iraq would never have happened) these incentives would occur.
If we want to break dependance then we either have to drill our own in those reserve lands/Alaska or give corporations and individuals the reason to take the risk and innovate.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
He may be producing a scroll, which is on display now soemwhere
Hot Forum Topics
