Some poor performance here last week (3-6, .333). Which brings the young season overall to .300 (3-7). Not good. Dutifully feeding in data for a look at every game, the box likes these: 1) NorthCarolina(-13.5)/Charlotte 2) Hawaii(-7)/SamHouston 3) TexasSt(+4.5)/UTSA 4) FresnoSt(+3)/OrergonSt 5) Virginia(+3)/NorthCarolinaSt 6) Baylor(+3)/SMU 7) ArizonaSt(-6.5)/MississippiSt 8) Colorado(-23.5)/Delaware 9) Florida(-17.5)/SouthFlorida
The algorithm also likes a handful of dogs not listed above (Duke/SanDiegoSt/UNLV). However, they all need to get-to a certain upward line (3.5/2.5/3.5). A few years ago, I incorporated an internal mechanism with the scope to assess lines higher & lower than present magnitude – allowing me to loosely anticipate. Very helpful to the process....
Apart from having a disappointing overall week, last Saturday did hold some rank-value (top five 3-2, .600). My system routinely delivers volume, so rank value can be a by-product of that. In fact, I have never really had a handicapping year where progressive rank was not imparted. Now, precisely where that seasonal magic-cutoff falls -- remains a mystery until December. Top four? Top six? Eight?
Even the Human Administrator is blind to that aspect! The current good news is -- we have 50 on the board this week; lots of opportunity. Good luck, TheKingfish
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Some poor performance here last week (3-6, .333). Which brings the young season overall to .300 (3-7). Not good. Dutifully feeding in data for a look at every game, the box likes these: 1) NorthCarolina(-13.5)/Charlotte 2) Hawaii(-7)/SamHouston 3) TexasSt(+4.5)/UTSA 4) FresnoSt(+3)/OrergonSt 5) Virginia(+3)/NorthCarolinaSt 6) Baylor(+3)/SMU 7) ArizonaSt(-6.5)/MississippiSt 8) Colorado(-23.5)/Delaware 9) Florida(-17.5)/SouthFlorida
The algorithm also likes a handful of dogs not listed above (Duke/SanDiegoSt/UNLV). However, they all need to get-to a certain upward line (3.5/2.5/3.5). A few years ago, I incorporated an internal mechanism with the scope to assess lines higher & lower than present magnitude – allowing me to loosely anticipate. Very helpful to the process....
Apart from having a disappointing overall week, last Saturday did hold some rank-value (top five 3-2, .600). My system routinely delivers volume, so rank value can be a by-product of that. In fact, I have never really had a handicapping year where progressive rank was not imparted. Now, precisely where that seasonal magic-cutoff falls -- remains a mystery until December. Top four? Top six? Eight?
Even the Human Administrator is blind to that aspect! The current good news is -- we have 50 on the board this week; lots of opportunity. Good luck, TheKingfish
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
