All Forums | College Football

*** NCAA Football Week 8 ***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 160714
Posts: 629
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 534
Posted: #376
Quote Originally Posted by sonicboom2532:

Do any of you guys think for yourselves? Boom is nice enough to post his picks. If you can't make educated decisions on a line moving a point one way or the other and it's affect in relation to critical numbers, you probably shouldn't be betting. Play the games he posts if you trail him(which I certainly do), you will make money. Talk about spoon feeding.

Yes, I understand what critical numbers are, and these lines have moved over critical numbers. (minus ND, just on the fence with this one, 8 can be key with 2 tuddys vs 2 field goals, or whether or not buying a half point is worth it, which I believe the answer to be no)

You ever think to yourself, speak when spoken to? 

If Boom doesn't want to answer he won't, next time when I'm asking a question I want you to respond to I'll say "hey, can that fucking loser who sticks his nose into other peoples business please let me know how he feels on the topic?"
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1717
Posted: #377

Quote Originally Posted by oddsbuster:

So you made the statement of "I know one thing, if the zookster couldn't beat this Ohio St. team, he never will"  with full knowledge and understanding of Zook's win in 2007 over Ohio st. Where is the sarcasm in that statement? Because i'm not seeing any. Why not just admit you made a mistake like Pony Express said and move along...

This is a quote from oddsbuster who has been around longer then Atomic Bomb. It just goes to show how pompous he is and his retarded top ten. He can't remember who won the game but now says he not only remembers the game but says he had Illini and the spread and remembers the ENTIRE GAME. Like I said he can't admit a simple mistake because his alter-ego is so big it won't let him. Also don't count on him giving you an opinion that is an actual play because it will come back and bite him in the ass especially not totals. Oddsbuster has WAYYY more credibility than BOMB because he can actual play multiple sports and his life is not this site.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 20312
Posted: #378
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 249
Posted: #379
If you have thought this much about it guy, then buy the points or don't bet it. Do you want him to hit the submit button on your wager for you too?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 864
Posted: #380
HANDICAPPER33....... please just get lost. We know your stance on boom.,,, you don't like/respect him..... That's fine... Just leave then. Don't waste any more of your time on Boom's thread then. I don't understand your thought process. If you don't like a restaurant, do you just go hang out there and tell people how bad the food is, and talk crap to the chef???? You my friend are the one who honestly has no life.

Last thought for HC33..... ( this is what I have a hard time understanding) HC33 say's that boom has no life, and that his life is this thread, all he ever does is post on covers! BUT, think about YOUR life HC33, by your logic, you posting about how pathetic boom is for posting????? Please explain that to me and the rest of us????
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 864
Posted: #381
Btw, HC33 if you ever come to Vegas lemme know, I will give you a full week of MMA training at my gym. Then I would LOVE to spar with you!!! All for free!!!! It will be a great way for you to get in shape!!!! :) ( wink, wink)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 2754
Posted: #382

I guess 70K views makes us all retards! Long live the Top 10!

 

 

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #383
Guys don't even pay attention to those nut sacks.....thats what they want.

I will discuss and talk later. Hope everyone has a great day.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 3197
Posted: #384
Boom like the picks

Good Luck To All Covers

Handicapper33 move on it's getting old
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 69
Posted: #385

Quote Originally Posted by GoGoplata123:

HANDICAPPER33....... please just get lost. We know your stance on boom.,,, you don't like/respect him..... That's fine... Just leave then. Don't waste any more of your time on Boom's thread then. I don't understand your thought process. If you don't like a restaurant, do you just go hang out there and tell people how bad the food is, and talk crap to the chef???? You my friend are the one who honestly has no life. 

Very well said!!!

We all want to read good discussions:

to share info,

to learn more,

help each other,

beat the man,

but it it seems like you gotta sort through a lot of crappy posters that act like a 14 year old.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 864
Posted: #386
Boom, what's your angle on the Minnesota pick????
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 1999
Posts: 4024
Posted: #387
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

Guys don't even pay attention to those nut sacks.....thats what they want.

 


THIS
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 534
Posted: #388
Quote Originally Posted by sonicboom2532:

If you have thought this much about it guy, then buy the points or don't bet it. Do you want him to hit the submit button on your wager for you too?

Why don't you mind your own stupid fuck? Why do you feel the need to butt into something that doesn't even concern you?

Do you feel like a big man trying to put me down on the internet? Do you feel you have some credibility or that you are doing boom favors so that one day you can suck on his dick?

I am asking for insight from Boom, and only Boom. When I come into your thread of winning picks and make comments (wait, who the fuck are you) I will gladly await your response. 

This world has enough assholes in it, thanks for contributing to the negativity that is all too common, you are quite a winning individual.

Why don't you take a second and practice shutting the fuck up, I think it will do you wonders not only on covers forums but in real life. I feel the less you talk the better everyone's life may be. May Satan have mercy on your soul, you pretentious dirtbag.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 3288
Posted: #389
Quote Originally Posted by GoGoplata123:

The only problem is Barrett Trotter, was spotted last week at Chuck-E-Cheese playing that little game where you try and throw the mini football's through the three little holes. Lady workin the toy store section, said he'd been there for a solid 30 minutes, and cashed out with 20 total prize tickets..... Good luck War Eagle offense!!!!


No Trotter this week.  Moseley is getting his first 'start' after relieving Trotter last week at halftime.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 984
Posted: #390
WHY USF? I dont get it? Just tell me why
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 5673
Posted: #391
Boom good luck on your upcoming picks.

Any leans to tonight's games?

Was leaning UAB +16.5 and Arizona -4.5.

Any thoughts?

Thx.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 249
Posted: #392
Don't want to disrespect someone's thread so I won't respond after this, but my point was the use common sense with your bets. If a line swings from when it opens, use some insight and bet it or pass on it. At the end of the day, its your money. You need to decide what you are comfortable with. No need for dropping a ton of f bombs and getting all religious.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 10
Posted: #393
It's Time to drop da BOOM BOOM on these bookies this week.... Cheeeeeeeeehuuuuuuuu!!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 113
Posted: #394
Quote Originally Posted by Handicapper33:

This is a quote from oddsbuster who has been around longer then Atomic Bomb. It just goes to show how pompous he is and his retarded top ten. He can't remember who won the game but now says he not only remembers the game but says he had Illini and the spread and remembers the ENTIRE GAME. Like I said he can't admit a simple mistake because his alter-ego is so big it won't let him. Also don't count on him giving you an opinion that is an actual play because it will come back and bite him in the ass especially not totals. Oddsbuster has WAYYY more credibility than BOMB because he can actual play multiple sports and his life is not this site.



hey handicapper33,
why dont you go and start your own threads like the one you started about fsu bein an easy play against clemson a few weeks ago.  what a wack bitch.  then i see you put down in your little space that your interests is women.  you have no game hater.  your women are prolly some skanks with stinky box.  thats why your breath stinks and you cant pick a winner you little bitch.  you got a wack avatar, your user name doesnt describe you, you cant make money, and cant pull dime women.  wackcapper33.  thats what ima start callin you.  wack bitch.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 12
Posted: #395

Just wish everyone would stop bashing everyone and focus on winning some $$. just saying....

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 534
Posted: #396
Sorry for blowing up, in retrospect it was uncalled for, I just don't like to be belittled especially when my inquiry wasn't directed at you.

On to more important things,

I think I will play Ok State -8.5 and drop ND  (not comfortable giving up more than 7).

Do you still see any value in Clemson -11.5?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 85
Posted: #397
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 818
Posted: #398
Hi Boom,

I am a habitual tailer of your plays and I usually agree with most of them.

However, I am concerned and surprised at your Minnesota pick, as I will be heavily on Nebraska. Minnesota lost at home to NMST, lost at home to FCS team NDST and got killed in their opening Big Ten games at Mich and Purdue.
Now, Nebraska has only covered one game this year (vs. Wyoming) but, coming off the bye, in a Big Ten game, I see them winning big. Nebraska is 15-7 vs. Big Ten teams before this year (ATS), on top of that Minnesota is 1-18 vs. ranked opponents historically.

I kind of thought this was going to be a laugher - can you put any context around your pick?

Thanks
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #399
Quote Originally Posted by GoMuckYaSelf:




Me either that's why I can't figure it out. The better side is obvious here. Wisconsin has to be it, or no play. This game should either end in a road trip blowout, or end at 35-17 or somewhere in that range. Notre Dame exposed State's defense. We are in a similar spot in this game. Everyone knows both teams pack defensive power, but you simply have to roll with the side that has the nation's #1 scoring offense. I basically see a clock management game here with Wisconsin pounding the ball with their three backs, and with one or two stops the Spartans stand no chance.

I am loving your Washington play, but again like I asked last week, why do you book dogs early? Stanford's public appearance will get you 21.5 or more easily. I don't think half of America knows who the Washington Huskies are.

Let's go!
you know I dont think we will see this one go any higher... ESPN and other are really hyping this game up and when that happens the Dog always seems to get love. I see it staying at 21 or going lower.

BTW... I think Washington is a pretty good football team. I know they got smacked by Nebraska earlier in the season but that means nothing.. Price was still finding his way. I think this team is much better with price than they were with locker.


 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #400
Quote Originally Posted by mas1E:

Boom,

Like your card, lines have moved, still play on these?

Ok St -9.5

Clemson -11.5

ND -8.5

Thoughts? buy 1/2 pts? lay off?
I think your fine
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.