Posted:
#201
BOL today 
0
*** NCAA Football Week 5 ***
Posted:
#202
Hey Boom, as you know, I saw all of Pitt's games, including the trip to Iowa....As you will see tonight on ESPN, if Pitt had a qb, somewhat like Smith of WVU, they'd be so much better....Sunseri is the QB because his old man was All American at Pitt....I've written this before on here that the line for this game, -2 SF, still got me puzzled as I think it's too low, but some here have made a good case for it....With that said, I'm locked in on Pitt, EVEN AT +2, as I think they put it all together tonight on national TV....I'll be at the game, and it's cooler here, in the 50's, with off-on rain all the way through today....Best of luck!!!!...Keep up the good work!
0
Posted:
#204
Quote Originally Posted by bleedncrimson:
Boom Boom....been following you and really respect your knowledge.
Any thoughts on Miss/Fresno St?? Im missing something....Is Ole Miss that bad??
Ole Miss fan for life here and honestly I have never seen a team so unprepared each week and that includes the miserable seasons under Coach O. On that note, I don't know if I can bet Fresno State though. Ole Miss is bad, traveling across the country, but Coach Nutt is coaching for his job this weekend. A loss here and I don't think he will make it through the season. Last week against Georgia, Ole Miss only scored two TDs and both were on trick plays. I am leaning Fresno but don't know if I will make it a play.
BOL on your plays this week Boom on a lot of them myself
0
Posted:
#205
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:
Thursday - Saturday
Georgia Tech -10.5 3 units
Clemson + 7 2 units
Auburn + 11.5 2 units
Texas -10 2 units
Alabama -3.5 2 units
UCLA +20.5 2 units
Auburn / S.C Over 59.5 2.5 units
Clemson / V.T Over 49 2 units
Nebraska / Wisconsin Under 56 2 units
Alabama / Florida Under 44.5 2 units
Will play two more games.........
Thursday - Saturday
Georgia Tech -10.5 3 units
Clemson + 7 2 units
Auburn + 11.5 2 units
Texas -10 2 units
Alabama -3.5 2 units
UCLA +20.5 2 units
Auburn / S.C Over 59.5 2.5 units
Clemson / V.T Over 49 2 units
Nebraska / Wisconsin Under 56 2 units
Alabama / Florida Under 44.5 2 units
Will play two more games.........
Damn Boom, I hate to jinx your mojo, but I like almost everything on your card . . . Bama, Bama UNDER, GT, Clemson (why the hell are they getting this many points??? 
), and Tejas.
Stay hot bro!!!
0
Posted:
#206
Quote Originally Posted by buildingbank:
Ole Miss fan for life here and honestly I have never seen a team so unprepared each week and that includes the miserable seasons under Coach O. On that note, I don't know if I can bet Fresno State though. Ole Miss is bad, traveling across the country, but Coach Nutt is coaching for his job this weekend. A loss here and I don't think he will make it through the season. Last week against Georgia, Ole Miss only scored two TDs and both were on trick plays. I am leaning Fresno but don't know if I will make it a play.
BOL on your plays this week Boom on a lot of them myself
Thanks for your insight Buildingbank
0
Posted:
#207
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:
EVERYONE
250 - Take it for what it's worth... my reputation of betting on Clemson football has been solid through the years. You have seen me betting on them a lot here recently... Why? There hot!! What do you do when a teams hot? I know when to pull the trigger on them and when not to.
EVERYONE
250 - Take it for what it's worth... my reputation of betting on Clemson football has been solid through the years. You have seen me betting on them a lot here recently... Why? There hot!! What do you do when a teams hot? I know when to pull the trigger on them and when not to.
He speaks the truth!
This guy is now my personal wagering consultant on this team.
I used to stay way clear of the Tigers but now I can pull the trigger with confidence starting with last week vs FSU
Thanks Boom, your commission check is in the mail
0
Posted:
#210
Damn, what a thread you got going Boom. Seems like you have to do everyone's homework for them without getting the credit...As always pal, GL this week and I am digging the card.
Personally I think Clemson getting 7 is an early xmas gift, I am a huge Hokie fan, named my oldest son after Cory Moore. Va. Tech is not that good ...just not...I agree ride the hot team and the Frosh WR is a BEAST!!! GL
0
Posted:
#212
Clem-VT total was to low,they are adjusting it already,up to 51,Aub.down to 10 and Wisc.total went up a point,1/2 point up on Ala.-45 total.
Not to bad as I waited for bets to clear in baseball,great final day as 2 teams finish their big collapsed,Boston and Atl.,gotta love that if your a sports fan.
Sorry back to football,had to throw that in though,as I just cleaned up on Balt.over Boston,
There has been a few guys that have asked about tonight,SF-Pitt,just curious if you have looked at this one yet?Im guessing you dont like it either way,but would you take SFlor.-2 or go under better.
Thanks for all your work and you have saved me from a bad start,thanks for that.GL this week and the Top 10 is a great read.
Not to bad as I waited for bets to clear in baseball,great final day as 2 teams finish their big collapsed,Boston and Atl.,gotta love that if your a sports fan.
Sorry back to football,had to throw that in though,as I just cleaned up on Balt.over Boston,
There has been a few guys that have asked about tonight,SF-Pitt,just curious if you have looked at this one yet?Im guessing you dont like it either way,but would you take SFlor.-2 or go under better.
Thanks for all your work and you have saved me from a bad start,thanks for that.GL this week and the Top 10 is a great read.
0
Posted:
#213
Quote Originally Posted by Kaka123:
I think the reason why most gamblers that bet on a large card don't succeed is because they are addictive gamblers who force plays. I think Boom picks his plays based on stats, injuries, trends, ect.
Kaka.. I actually dont use a ton of trends and statistics. I use my eyes. I have a "feel" for the game...and along with a lot of experience.I think the reason why most gamblers that bet on a large card don't succeed is because they are addictive gamblers who force plays. I think Boom picks his plays based on stats, injuries, trends, ect.
0
Posted:
#214
Quote Originally Posted by Thebettymo:
hey man!! I agree. I think there is a different swagger about this team. There playing well right now and I think that we a legit shot at wining this game.Well Boom it looks like our boys are rolling! I think this team has the confidence it needs to really make a splash this year, and that starts Saturday in Blacksburg. I think we have what it takes to win straight up and I will gladly take the TD spot. After struggling with the two openers, spanking the defending national champ, and showing toughness after the pick six against the Noles, I think these kids are ready for the road trip. Tajh just needs to remember one thing: Get the ball to Sammy and everything will be ok!
Also like GT big this week as NC State is an absolute train wreck in all aspects of the game we know as American football. But you know what they say, "even when you know you never really know" GL this week!
0
Posted:
#215
Quote Originally Posted by pitbull666:
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:
This is the biggest lie people can tell you. Betting on less games doesn't prove shit. I have proven that betting on 10 - 15 games a week for several several years is profitable.
I dont increase my bets. I play anywhere from 1.5 to 3...every now and then I play a 4 or 5 play. ( units =$100 )
Why? Because I have a " plan "...and I know that through time I will be successful with playing what I believe is the right way. I dont get over excited about a win and down on myself on a loss.
Thank you for the answer but you may have left out your call on the UCLA game and question I had above.
Thx for your time and effort.
I know it doesn't match up to what "SEEMS" right. I just think that Stanford may be a tad overrated.. and UCLA is a team who is just hungry for success. This will be a close game.This is the biggest lie people can tell you. Betting on less games doesn't prove shit. I have proven that betting on 10 - 15 games a week for several several years is profitable.
I dont increase my bets. I play anywhere from 1.5 to 3...every now and then I play a 4 or 5 play. ( units =$100 )
Why? Because I have a " plan "...and I know that through time I will be successful with playing what I believe is the right way. I dont get over excited about a win and down on myself on a loss.
Thank you for the answer but you may have left out your call on the UCLA game and question I had above.
Thx for your time and effort.
0
Posted:
#217
Quote Originally Posted by GoMuckYaSelf:
Anything particular as to why you chose UCLA and the points Boom?
They got their asses handed to them by Texas at home, and played a close one at Houston. Stanford is in a whole different category than those two teams. I don't see them struggling at all this season, but maybe a close game with Oregon. I know Skov and Owusu are out, but Luck so many other weapons, and that defense did just fine in Arizona. UCLA is giving up almost 200 yards a game on the ground, and with this multiback threat Stanford should have no problem covering this one. Luck's options are wide open. Only way I see UCLA covering is if they cover late on the 2nd string D.
Just wondering you reason for the play man. Much respect to you and BOL. I love your Tigers this week, it's too bad Clemson is not at home so we could get them like +2 or a pk. There would be some good value with them as a home dog. I'm with you on Bama too. Even though its the "Swamp" I think the Tide will be bringing their waders. Florida has met their match, and Bama should win by a touchdown.
Hey manAnything particular as to why you chose UCLA and the points Boom?
They got their asses handed to them by Texas at home, and played a close one at Houston. Stanford is in a whole different category than those two teams. I don't see them struggling at all this season, but maybe a close game with Oregon. I know Skov and Owusu are out, but Luck so many other weapons, and that defense did just fine in Arizona. UCLA is giving up almost 200 yards a game on the ground, and with this multiback threat Stanford should have no problem covering this one. Luck's options are wide open. Only way I see UCLA covering is if they cover late on the 2nd string D.
Just wondering you reason for the play man. Much respect to you and BOL. I love your Tigers this week, it's too bad Clemson is not at home so we could get them like +2 or a pk. There would be some good value with them as a home dog. I'm with you on Bama too. Even though its the "Swamp" I think the Tide will be bringing their waders. Florida has met their match, and Bama should win by a touchdown.
.. Yeah I addressed this in another post somewhere. But this game will be much closer than people will think. 0
Posted:
#218
Quote Originally Posted by PlacinUnits:
your card, my card, same difference. at least i can say i posted some of those totals first and posted behind you on the spreads. which means, we can celebrate together...or get really mad about the same time on saturday.
Placin... you better be rightyour card, my card, same difference. at least i can say i posted some of those totals first and posted behind you on the spreads. which means, we can celebrate together...or get really mad about the same time on saturday.
0
Posted:
#220
Quote Originally Posted by bleedncrimson:
damn does Ole Miss Suck...Boom Boom....been following you and really respect your knowledge.
Any thoughts on Miss/Fresno St?? Im missing something....Is Ole Miss that bad??
..Im JK. I really think there not as bad as people think. They just need some confidence to come there way.0
Posted:
#221
Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:
Whats up JimmyDamn Boom, I hate to jinx your mojo, but I like almost everything on your card . . . Bama, Bama UNDER, GT, Clemson (why the hell are they getting this many points??? ), and Tejas.
Stay hot bro!!!
Yeah, I see a Bama win this week. 23 - 10 is my prediction 0
Posted:
#223
Quote Originally Posted by phark:
Damn, what a thread you got going Boom. Seems like you have to do everyone's homework for them without getting the credit...As always pal, GL this week and I am digging the card.
Personally I think Clemson getting 7 is an early xmas gift, I am a huge Hokie fan, named my oldest son after Cory Moore. Va. Tech is not that good ...just not...I agree ride the hot team and the Frosh WR is a BEAST!!! GL
Thanks man... I m not saying we win this game with complete confidence. But, i do think we have a very good shot at it. I respect the V.T program, those guys have ran the ACC for several years now.... I just think this YOUNG Clemson team is good.0
Posted:
#225
Thursday - Saturday
Georgia Tech -10.5 3 units
Clemson + 7 2 units
Auburn + 11.5 2 units
Texas -10 2 units
Alabama -3.5 2 units
UCLA +20.5 2 units
Pittsburgh + 3 1.5 units
Auburn / S.C Over 59.5 2.5 units
Clemson / V.T Over 49 2 units
Nebraska / Wisconsin Under 56 2 units
Alabama / Florida Under 44.5 2 units
Georgia Tech -10.5 3 units
Clemson + 7 2 units
Auburn + 11.5 2 units
Texas -10 2 units
Alabama -3.5 2 units
UCLA +20.5 2 units
Pittsburgh + 3 1.5 units
Auburn / S.C Over 59.5 2.5 units
Clemson / V.T Over 49 2 units
Nebraska / Wisconsin Under 56 2 units
Alabama / Florida Under 44.5 2 units
0
Hot Forum Topics
Established in 1995,Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by:
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.