Welcome all STREAK BREAKERS,,,,,,,into week #4,, time to get serious in the wagers we make
I see your reasoning, but from a money management perspective, I think I still have to disagree. if we play out the numbers that I am finding - you would have been up units betting on the 3-0 team to cover - and when they do, you get to win 2 units on them by fading them. Certainly you do lose a unit every loss at 3-0 as the streak is broken.
Doubling starting at 3-0 is very dicey - there are and WILL BE long streaks. There were 29 streaks of 7 or more last year. So far there have been 2 (though covers only has one due to them not recognizing a lined game). There are more to come. Avoiding them/cutting losses is key. Of those 29, 16 were eight or longer.
Once they get to 8, it may be profitable to start betting them again (16-10)
I am still thinking...and thinking....and thinking. We all want to win and it is great we are all putting our heads together.
I see your reasoning, but from a money management perspective, I think I still have to disagree. if we play out the numbers that I am finding - you would have been up units betting on the 3-0 team to cover - and when they do, you get to win 2 units on them by fading them. Certainly you do lose a unit every loss at 3-0 as the streak is broken.
Doubling starting at 3-0 is very dicey - there are and WILL BE long streaks. There were 29 streaks of 7 or more last year. So far there have been 2 (though covers only has one due to them not recognizing a lined game). There are more to come. Avoiding them/cutting losses is key. Of those 29, 16 were eight or longer.
Once they get to 8, it may be profitable to start betting them again (16-10)
I am still thinking...and thinking....and thinking. We all want to win and it is great we are all putting our heads together.
Guys there has been only 9 teams that have exceeded the #4 W/L streaks of all 280 teams,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,If you renove the teams that got to # 5 there were 5,,so after #5 there have only been 4 teams,,,,,,,N Mexico at #7,Longest,,,,0-6 Elon and San fran w ML, and 6-0 Sac St who finally lost,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
So you must understand SYSTEM has great POTENTIAL as these teams move foreward
Guys there has been only 9 teams that have exceeded the #4 W/L streaks of all 280 teams,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,If you renove the teams that got to # 5 there were 5,,so after #5 there have only been 4 teams,,,,,,,N Mexico at #7,Longest,,,,0-6 Elon and San fran w ML, and 6-0 Sac St who finally lost,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
So you must understand SYSTEM has great POTENTIAL as these teams move foreward
Wouldn't that conflict if 3-0 Portland St. is playing 5-0 St. Marys? I think it would be easier to play the smaller number of games with waiting till teams are 0-4 or 4-0
It all depends on how you want to play it/size of bankroll/unit etc.
I played ON portland st to cover again and against St Mary's who is due to NOT cover.
I played ON Minn - both from a capping and a continue the 3-0 streak.
I played ON La Lafayette, fading So Miss.
Wouldn't that conflict if 3-0 Portland St. is playing 5-0 St. Marys? I think it would be easier to play the smaller number of games with waiting till teams are 0-4 or 4-0
It all depends on how you want to play it/size of bankroll/unit etc.
I played ON portland st to cover again and against St Mary's who is due to NOT cover.
I played ON Minn - both from a capping and a continue the 3-0 streak.
I played ON La Lafayette, fading So Miss.
"I played ON Minn - both from a capping and a continue the 3-0 streak."
"I played ON Minn - both from a capping and a continue the 3-0 streak."
What's up boys. Yes the NHL system that everyone is referring to is DIFFERENT than the streak one that I do. So make sure you are looking at the right one before you leap. I think they are up between 20-30 units on the year. My NHL system has only been running since 11/25 and is up just over 10 units. So choose your poison.
Here are the NBA streak picks for tonight...You will notice Chigaco is not on there even though they are on about 100 in a row not covering...![]()
They were moved to my Labouchere system to avoid betting 1000 freaking units on a game.
Last chance on Detroit fade before it moves to Labouchere as well.
BOL!!! ![]()
Charlotte -4.5 1 unit
Charlotte Under 196 2.31 to win 2.1 units
Miami Under 206 1 unit
LA Lakers Over 193.5 1 unit
Houston -5 10.19 to win 9.26 units (last chance)
Houston Over 189 2.31 to win 2.1 units
Phoenix Over 211 1.21 to win 1.1 units
Peace out!
What's up boys. Yes the NHL system that everyone is referring to is DIFFERENT than the streak one that I do. So make sure you are looking at the right one before you leap. I think they are up between 20-30 units on the year. My NHL system has only been running since 11/25 and is up just over 10 units. So choose your poison.
Here are the NBA streak picks for tonight...You will notice Chigaco is not on there even though they are on about 100 in a row not covering...![]()
They were moved to my Labouchere system to avoid betting 1000 freaking units on a game.
Last chance on Detroit fade before it moves to Labouchere as well.
BOL!!! ![]()
Charlotte -4.5 1 unit
Charlotte Under 196 2.31 to win 2.1 units
Miami Under 206 1 unit
LA Lakers Over 193.5 1 unit
Houston -5 10.19 to win 9.26 units (last chance)
Houston Over 189 2.31 to win 2.1 units
Phoenix Over 211 1.21 to win 1.1 units
Peace out!
2008-2009 + 2006-2008 major conferences ONLY.
Teams that reached 3-0
506 streaks
Teams covered to got to 4-0 254-250
Criminy - thanks for making me do that again - I know it is productive this year, and thought it was productive in years past but IT IS NOT.
Avoiding 3-0 all together is certainly the smart thing to do.
Teams that reached 0-3
I must have just transposed it in my mind. betting 0-3 teams this year would lead to a 20-23 mark. Historically it would lead to a 223-255. Better to think that they might continue to 0-4 instead.
Conclusion: 3-0 and 0-3 are not good indicators.
2008-2009 + 2006-2008 major conferences ONLY.
Teams that reached 3-0
506 streaks
Teams covered to got to 4-0 254-250
Criminy - thanks for making me do that again - I know it is productive this year, and thought it was productive in years past but IT IS NOT.
Avoiding 3-0 all together is certainly the smart thing to do.
Teams that reached 0-3
I must have just transposed it in my mind. betting 0-3 teams this year would lead to a 20-23 mark. Historically it would lead to a 223-255. Better to think that they might continue to 0-4 instead.
Conclusion: 3-0 and 0-3 are not good indicators.
I keep forgetting that we start new threads. I think I need to post the past streak numbers on my profile page so that everyone can reference them. I will do that once the 2006-2008 numbers are done.
2008-2009 + 2006-2008 major conferences ONLY.
Teams that reached 3-0
506 streaks
Teams covered to got to 4-0 254-250
Criminy - thanks for making me do that again - I know it is productive this year, and thought it was productive in years past but IT IS NOT.
Avoiding 3-0 all together is certainly the smart thing to do.
Teams that reached 0-3
I must have just transposed it in my mind. betting 0-3 teams this year would lead to a 20-23 mark. Historically it would lead to a 223-255. Better to think that they might continue to 0-4 instead.
Conclusion: 3-0 and 0-3 are not good indicators.
The good news is once you rake playing this system for a few more years the bankroll will be big enough to back up to the 3-0, 0-3 games if you want. Basically you would have to chase for one more game on all of those....which means eventually it would lead to another 506 units won in those years.
FYI I did this for a few years starting from game 1...meaning I basically bet on every team - every game...I can get into it more sometime but it was sweet. Unfortunately not productive unless you have a huge bankroll. Losing 10 straight starting from game 1 gets up there in a hurry....5,10,20,40,80,160,320,640,1280 and 2560 (plus juice)....seems weird to be betting 2560 to win back your 5 but it happens. (I did have a positive year in the NBA one year doing it. played from 1-8 and ended up winning about $3K for the season.) That was the only positive year.
Damn I got off topic there for a while. Good luck tonight everyone.
![]()
I keep forgetting that we start new threads. I think I need to post the past streak numbers on my profile page so that everyone can reference them. I will do that once the 2006-2008 numbers are done.
2008-2009 + 2006-2008 major conferences ONLY.
Teams that reached 3-0
506 streaks
Teams covered to got to 4-0 254-250
Criminy - thanks for making me do that again - I know it is productive this year, and thought it was productive in years past but IT IS NOT.
Avoiding 3-0 all together is certainly the smart thing to do.
Teams that reached 0-3
I must have just transposed it in my mind. betting 0-3 teams this year would lead to a 20-23 mark. Historically it would lead to a 223-255. Better to think that they might continue to 0-4 instead.
Conclusion: 3-0 and 0-3 are not good indicators.
The good news is once you rake playing this system for a few more years the bankroll will be big enough to back up to the 3-0, 0-3 games if you want. Basically you would have to chase for one more game on all of those....which means eventually it would lead to another 506 units won in those years.
FYI I did this for a few years starting from game 1...meaning I basically bet on every team - every game...I can get into it more sometime but it was sweet. Unfortunately not productive unless you have a huge bankroll. Losing 10 straight starting from game 1 gets up there in a hurry....5,10,20,40,80,160,320,640,1280 and 2560 (plus juice)....seems weird to be betting 2560 to win back your 5 but it happens. (I did have a positive year in the NBA one year doing it. played from 1-8 and ended up winning about $3K for the season.) That was the only positive year.
Damn I got off topic there for a while. Good luck tonight everyone.
![]()
Guys i do not see the reason to play streaks less than #4,,if you on a slow day want to mess with them so be it,,,,,
The first is there are too many games that can come to that,,For me team must get to #4 this reduces the # of plays and allows you to keep your bankroll for latter plays,,,,With only 9 teams out of 280 i think is great ODDS exceeding #4,,and i'll push it to -5 or +5 as then its only 4 teams so far this season out of 280 and i know those #'s are correct as i'm counting them,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Guys i do not see the reason to play streaks less than #4,,if you on a slow day want to mess with them so be it,,,,,
The first is there are too many games that can come to that,,For me team must get to #4 this reduces the # of plays and allows you to keep your bankroll for latter plays,,,,With only 9 teams out of 280 i think is great ODDS exceeding #4,,and i'll push it to -5 or +5 as then its only 4 teams so far this season out of 280 and i know those #'s are correct as i'm counting them,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
my plays t nite
Portland St,,,,+15.5
Lafayette,,,,,,+8.5
going to try the NBA since both are noted in both posts of
Airmail and osborne
Bobcats and Rockets
thats it for me,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,I'm in no hurry to play 15 games
my plays t nite
Portland St,,,,+15.5
Lafayette,,,,,,+8.5
going to try the NBA since both are noted in both posts of
Airmail and osborne
Bobcats and Rockets
thats it for me,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,I'm in no hurry to play 15 games
Guys i do not see the reason to play streaks less than #4,,if you on a slow day want to mess with them so be it,,,,,
The first is there are too many games that can come to that,,For me team must get to #4 this reduces the # of plays and allows you to keep your bankroll for latter plays,,,,With only 9 teams out of 280 i think is great ODDS exceeding #4,,and i'll push it to -5 or +5 as then its only 4 teams so far this season out of 280 and i know those #'s are correct as i'm counting them,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I've got about 16 plays for all thress sports if you count streaks and over/unders. If you need more action than that you are a kook!! Let's kick some hiney tonight!! ![]()
Guys i do not see the reason to play streaks less than #4,,if you on a slow day want to mess with them so be it,,,,,
The first is there are too many games that can come to that,,For me team must get to #4 this reduces the # of plays and allows you to keep your bankroll for latter plays,,,,With only 9 teams out of 280 i think is great ODDS exceeding #4,,and i'll push it to -5 or +5 as then its only 4 teams so far this season out of 280 and i know those #'s are correct as i'm counting them,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I've got about 16 plays for all thress sports if you count streaks and over/unders. If you need more action than that you are a kook!! Let's kick some hiney tonight!! ![]()
my plays t nite
Portland St,,,,+15.5
Lafayette,,,,,,+8.5
going to try the NBA since both are noted in both posts of
Airmail and osborne
Bobcats and Rockets
thats it for me,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,I'm in no hurry to play 15 games
Goalline no Florida St for you? I've got Georgia St on a 4 games cover streak...it's a little shaky though because there are some games in there where there was no line because they were playing 4 homeless guys and a rabbi in a pickup game. Good Luck tonight!!
my plays t nite
Portland St,,,,+15.5
Lafayette,,,,,,+8.5
going to try the NBA since both are noted in both posts of
Airmail and osborne
Bobcats and Rockets
thats it for me,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,I'm in no hurry to play 15 games
Goalline no Florida St for you? I've got Georgia St on a 4 games cover streak...it's a little shaky though because there are some games in there where there was no line because they were playing 4 homeless guys and a rabbi in a pickup game. Good Luck tonight!!
| 12/13/09 | @FAMU | L 58-60 | - - | - - |
| 12/05/09 | @JMAD | W 49-44 | W 1.5 | U 121 |
| 11/30/09 | JCKSN | W 64-54 | - - | - - |
| 11/26/09 | @SALAB | L 66-70 | W 4.5 | - - |
| 11/25/09 | UTVAL (N) | W 59-52 | W -6.5 | - - |
| 11/22/09 | INDPU (N) | L 56-67 (OT) | L 4.5 | - - |
| 11/21/09 | HOW (N) | W 57-33 | W -12 | - - |
| 11/20/09 | DRAKE (N) | L 58-65 | L -1 | - - |
| 11/17/09 | CBC | W 77-53 | - - | - - |
| 11/12/09 | @NCSTA | L 53-69 | L 10.5 | U 135 |
| 12/13/09 | @FAMU | L 58-60 | - - | - - |
| 12/05/09 | @JMAD | W 49-44 | W 1.5 | U 121 |
| 11/30/09 | JCKSN | W 64-54 | - - | - - |
| 11/26/09 | @SALAB | L 66-70 | W 4.5 | - - |
| 11/25/09 | UTVAL (N) | W 59-52 | W -6.5 | - - |
| 11/22/09 | INDPU (N) | L 56-67 (OT) | L 4.5 | - - |
| 11/21/09 | HOW (N) | W 57-33 | W -12 | - - |
| 11/20/09 | DRAKE (N) | L 58-65 | L -1 | - - |
| 11/17/09 | CBC | W 77-53 | - - | - - |
| 11/12/09 | @NCSTA | L 53-69 | L 10.5 | U 135 |
...it's a little shaky though because there are some games in there where there was no line because they were playing 4 homeless guys and a rabbi in a pickup game. Good Luck tonight!!![]()
...it's a little shaky though because there are some games in there where there was no line because they were playing 4 homeless guys and a rabbi in a pickup game. Good Luck tonight!!![]()
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
445,784
-
Tuesday 09/08/2026
977
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
253,247
-
Couple thoughts
3,958
-
9/8 POD 🔥🔥????
3,453
-
Tuesday
2,834
-
Breathtaking ....truly
20,479
-
We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever
26,699
-
Obviously the true face of the republican party
30,558
-
PART DEUX
216
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
