OTT@SSK : These 2 teams will not meet again until week 18 (out of 21) where OTT will have a 7 day rest advantage, playing @ home vs SSK.
Everyone is on SSK tonight, mainly because it is their home opener. I heard weak ticket sales for this game! They have some big injuries on the OL, so does OTT but I noticed how OTT seemed to be further along this preseason. Their weakness is their coach. This might be his last year?
Still I like OTT tonight. Ott's kick return game is awesome. Why teams still kick to Deadmon is beyond me, lol.
It is why OTT always starts with good field position! Almost every time! Bad coaching nullifies their good returns.
I noticed for the 1st time books are posting "live" throughout the whole game. Kinda screws with the true 2nd Half line, which I do not like.
Well I have OTT +3.5 for the full game tonight.
GL.
0
Only in the CFL...
OTT@SSK : These 2 teams will not meet again until week 18 (out of 21) where OTT will have a 7 day rest advantage, playing @ home vs SSK.
Everyone is on SSK tonight, mainly because it is their home opener. I heard weak ticket sales for this game! They have some big injuries on the OL, so does OTT but I noticed how OTT seemed to be further along this preseason. Their weakness is their coach. This might be his last year?
Still I like OTT tonight. Ott's kick return game is awesome. Why teams still kick to Deadmon is beyond me, lol.
It is why OTT always starts with good field position! Almost every time! Bad coaching nullifies their good returns.
I noticed for the 1st time books are posting "live" throughout the whole game. Kinda screws with the true 2nd Half line, which I do not like.
Its so true regarding lines. You can easily make a case that there was more transparency and better odds before legalization. Everyone wants a bigger cut with the betters paying the price. I was reading somewhere that the state of Illinois is going to charge bookmakers a 25% tax on every wager. If that is the case than the bookmaker will bake that into the lines, ie passing the tax onto the consumer. Hope other states / provinces push back on this. I deal with Pinnacle because I primarily bet Soccer and they have the best odds but North American Books seems to be really squeezing their customers. Sports Interaction Lines are usually 20 to 30 cents higher and a lot of their odds have juice on either side. Unacceptable!
0
@CFLChef
Its so true regarding lines. You can easily make a case that there was more transparency and better odds before legalization. Everyone wants a bigger cut with the betters paying the price. I was reading somewhere that the state of Illinois is going to charge bookmakers a 25% tax on every wager. If that is the case than the bookmaker will bake that into the lines, ie passing the tax onto the consumer. Hope other states / provinces push back on this. I deal with Pinnacle because I primarily bet Soccer and they have the best odds but North American Books seems to be really squeezing their customers. Sports Interaction Lines are usually 20 to 30 cents higher and a lot of their odds have juice on either side. Unacceptable!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.