Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator: They don't like me at either place. I have Princeton today, too. who else are you on today?
|
Cross21 | 123 |
|
|
facebook is a joke, no? when investing you want to ask yourself if the company has been around for 5 years and if they will likely be around for the next 5. good rule of thumb. |
bigvern1013 | 67 |
|
|
2 team parlay: boston -140 vs miami 1st leg. 2nd leg is boston +240-300 vs OKC/spurs gives you ~ 5-1
|
smartkuz | 9 |
|
|
yeah but when did danny green miss so many wide open 3 pointers?
|
PIDI | 20 |
|
|
what was the final here?
|
Gavinnick | 12 |
|
|
hmm ok, not sold on your arguments. seems like you are trying to save face with your $1500 being significant argument, but only you know if thats the case.
ill point out that the number (1500) has become $2200 overnight. 100 shares of Facebook is 3400 and 10 shares of apple is 5600. so to place a lot of faith in this 1500 is dangerous. i.e. your 29% argument just skyrocketed to about 40% in 1 trading day. but this whole debate is moot if you just buy 8 shares of apple. the point of this debate is lost in your argument of the average investor clunking down $5600 vs $3200, i think.
|
bigvern1013 | 67 |
|
|
also, the 'cheapness' or 'bargain-ability' for lack of a better word of a stock has nothing to do with its stock price. it does have to do with their PE ratio. so when people talk about how apple is so expensive, its really only a 14 P/E. they could do a 10-1 split and make it a $56 dollar stock and nothing would change.
so you need to look at a stocks price to earnings ratio but errrm ill give you a pardon on that one with Facebook and their looming question over the E part of the equation.
|
bigvern1013 | 67 |
|
|
so before today, 100 shares of FB $3800 vs 10 shares of apple at $5300 is SIGNIFICANT?
ok bro. also,can you explain which cost outlays/economies of scale you speak of? |
bigvern1013 | 67 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mellow_wolf: If the stock continues to drop, it certainly is an investment to ponder. If you are a long-term investor, potentially obtaining FB at $25-30 a share is an intriguing wager. Most people are priced out of purchasing multiple shares(100 or more) of other, more established, large cap tech companies such as Apple($560), Google($614) or LinkedIn($97). However, FB is reasonably priced for most folks at this initial stage. The big question is userbase monetization, especially in the mobile market. FB will likely be able to monetize its userbase over the next few years, though at what rate remains unclear. To his credit, Zuckerberg has established a strong executive leadership with Sandberg(COO) and Cox(VP). These two are savvy and well thought out individuals who are prepared for the long haul. FB is essentially in its infancy in terms of revenue. Its profit margins are in the high 40's, which is enviable. Though its growth is slowing(relatively to its past hyper-growth), its revenues and profits are all going to increase this year and likely the next. It has multiple potential avenues to explore to increase revenue, including, significantly, online gambling. It's a worldwide presence, so don't discount FB's potential in countries such as India and Brazil and, possibly, China in the future. I think many of us get sucked into a bubble of thinking FB is an American phenomenon. It's bigger than most of surmise. American skepticism rules the FB media here, but it is not quite so "hated" abroad. If it drops into the 20's, it is something I would certainly consider as a long-term wager. The price would be more appropriate(and quite affordable) and the payoff possibly significant, over time, if you are willing to wait for returns. whats so special about 100 shares? if i had 10 shares of apple today, i made 300. 100 shares of fb would require a $3 move to make that same 300. i don't see any difference. this is a common misnomer "oh geez i can't buy apple or google because its $600 a share!"
|
bigvern1013 | 67 |
|
|
i just played, i don't think its rigged
|
Messier-11 | 47 |
|
|
nigga looks like ET with glasses
|
Blackchips | 2 |
|
|
just got back yesterday, stayed at el san juan too. (ESJ). roooms are horrible compared to the ritz or the intercontinental, both 5 min walk from ESJ. but the nightlife at ESJ is the best, the lobby turns into a club just about every night and the pool scene is good. brother jimmys is supposed to open march 22, awesome rooftop sports bar. |
timdogs17 | 9 |
|
|
while we are on the topic of giving advice, it would also be good for all you young newcomers to spell "consistent" properly.
|
bigvern1013 | 21 |
|
|
i would argue that tony brothers is not corrupt, but actually quite the contrary. i've watched him ref each of his last 22 games sincei started following this trend more closely. it is my belief that 90% of refs slightly, subconsciously favor the home team when it comes to marginal calls (block vs charge, tipped ball out of bounds, over the back fouls). tony brothers, on the other hand, keeps it REAL. and thats real good for away backers. so if anyone is crying out to tell david stern to look at this, they might want to tell mr. stern to hire some more brothers.
|
TheWalkman | 15 |
|
|
giants to receive the ball is as much of a lock as there can be without laying absurd juice. if anyone likes to challenge that i'd be curious as to what they have to say
|
TheAceMan | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
I do think it will be funny if the Pats win by exactly 1 or 2 points.... That will be a monstrous bloodbath. how do you know this for certain? as for me, my biggest wager on this game is a prop bet that dwarfs my bet on the game. i am laying -220 on giants to receive the ball. risking 18 dimes. the line should be more like -600. |
vanzack | 50 |
|
|
not trying to be combative but i learned nothing from that article. not a knock on vanzack |
vanzack | 50 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by nooob:
found his website https://www.sayreschool.org/page.cfm?p=433
lol wtf is this shyt |
NEPatsFan | 14 |
|
|
ill be there, we have been going to the private party at PH for years and they really do it. ive got extra tickets to the party at HR if anyone covers members want them
|
DOVJAK | 66 |
|
|
his real forte was nba
|
NEPatsFan | 14 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.