psic, is that how you can be reached?
One future option for those of you who have a book that will give you moneylines and run lines....you can make a balanced wager using both the run line and money line so that if our underdog loses by exactly 1 run you break even and can just walk away. It's just like betting the favorite on the moneyline and on the -1.5 run line.
As an example using a 100 wager if you bet Detroit +1.5 -200 for $70 to win $35 and $30 at +114 to win about $40....with the Tigers losing by 1 they would have won the +1.5 bet and you would have collected back $105 in your account actually being $5 profitable. You could then walk away with zero effect on your line.
I DID play more that way last year. For me I use kind of a gut feel from experience but it is a very effective way to play thereby protecting yourself from a loss when your team leaves 12 runners stranded.....Detroit you rotten bastards....Ok I'm better now.
Seriously, I didn't want to make it confusing but all you have to do is bet enough on the +1.5 runs line to protect your moneyline bet. Just a possibility.
Finally, again just a gut feeling like why I laid off of the Dodgers...I'm staying in on the Detroit series. Maybe I'll look like an ass for doing it but I'm playing game 2 with Detriot and I'm playing the LA dodgers for the base amount of my line on Wednesday.
One future option for those of you who have a book that will give you moneylines and run lines....you can make a balanced wager using both the run line and money line so that if our underdog loses by exactly 1 run you break even and can just walk away. It's just like betting the favorite on the moneyline and on the -1.5 run line.
As an example using a 100 wager if you bet Detroit +1.5 -200 for $70 to win $35 and $30 at +114 to win about $40....with the Tigers losing by 1 they would have won the +1.5 bet and you would have collected back $105 in your account actually being $5 profitable. You could then walk away with zero effect on your line.
I DID play more that way last year. For me I use kind of a gut feel from experience but it is a very effective way to play thereby protecting yourself from a loss when your team leaves 12 runners stranded.....Detroit you rotten bastards....Ok I'm better now.
Seriously, I didn't want to make it confusing but all you have to do is bet enough on the +1.5 runs line to protect your moneyline bet. Just a possibility.
Finally, again just a gut feeling like why I laid off of the Dodgers...I'm staying in on the Detroit series. Maybe I'll look like an ass for doing it but I'm playing game 2 with Detriot and I'm playing the LA dodgers for the base amount of my line on Wednesday.
I just got an e-mail from John Morrison saying that he has come up with a Version 2.0 for his "Advanced NBA & MLB System." He claims the flaws from the old system are patched up and the filters are enhanced. Apparently, John says, this will vastly increase your return on investment. He also claims that he went undefeated last MLB season using Version 2.0. He is charging an a fee of $175 for they improved system.
Has any else heard of this? He doesn't give any more details regarding Version 2.0 and I'm trying to figure out if it's worth purchasing. If it works, it would definitely be worth spending $175 to avoid enduring those couple of painful (and costly) losses throughout the season. Thoughts???
I just got an e-mail from John Morrison saying that he has come up with a Version 2.0 for his "Advanced NBA & MLB System." He claims the flaws from the old system are patched up and the filters are enhanced. Apparently, John says, this will vastly increase your return on investment. He also claims that he went undefeated last MLB season using Version 2.0. He is charging an a fee of $175 for they improved system.
Has any else heard of this? He doesn't give any more details regarding Version 2.0 and I'm trying to figure out if it's worth purchasing. If it works, it would definitely be worth spending $175 to avoid enduring those couple of painful (and costly) losses throughout the season. Thoughts???
I think Boston has a pretty good show, but would be careful with St.Louis. Pitt is 7-3 in thier L10.
I think Boston has a pretty good show, but would be careful with St.Louis. Pitt is 7-3 in thier L10.
My understanding is that based on the system we would only chase a team like this if it had lost 4+ games going into a new series. For example, if you started chasing St. Louis tomorrow, would you chase them for 3 games (1 in the Pittsburgh series and 2 in the Tampa series)? I don't think this fits in with the system. I believe it was designed to chase in a 3-game series. Obviously you are free to make whatever plays you want, but I'm not going to make plays like that unless psic comes on and corrects my understanding of the system. Good luck if you decide to go ahead with it though.
Based on my so far limited knowledge of this money management system I think you're pretty much correct. Assuming you are reasonable with your lines, I don't think it will make that much of a difference in the end. Psic used an example where if there was a game at 7 and a game at 10, he would use the same line for the 10:00 game if the 7:00 game won, but start a new line if the 7:00 game lost. So I think, as you say, you basically just decide how many lines to use based on a) how many games are being played and b) how conservative you want to be.
As soon as the team you're chasing wins one game in the series you are finished with that series and move on to the next. I think this answers your question, let me know if I didn't quite understand what you were asking.
My understanding is that based on the system we would only chase a team like this if it had lost 4+ games going into a new series. For example, if you started chasing St. Louis tomorrow, would you chase them for 3 games (1 in the Pittsburgh series and 2 in the Tampa series)? I don't think this fits in with the system. I believe it was designed to chase in a 3-game series. Obviously you are free to make whatever plays you want, but I'm not going to make plays like that unless psic comes on and corrects my understanding of the system. Good luck if you decide to go ahead with it though.
Based on my so far limited knowledge of this money management system I think you're pretty much correct. Assuming you are reasonable with your lines, I don't think it will make that much of a difference in the end. Psic used an example where if there was a game at 7 and a game at 10, he would use the same line for the 10:00 game if the 7:00 game won, but start a new line if the 7:00 game lost. So I think, as you say, you basically just decide how many lines to use based on a) how many games are being played and b) how conservative you want to be.
As soon as the team you're chasing wins one game in the series you are finished with that series and move on to the next. I think this answers your question, let me know if I didn't quite understand what you were asking.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.