Scal, he has had a TON of incredible miracle wins over the past couple months that have been ridiculously luckier than that Bucks loss. The packer one tonight was obvious, but it's one of about 5 absolute miracles.
I'll have to trust you on that one. It's hard to top Bucks Heat game although I saw you taking about Va Tech cover in Beamer's last game at home as being worse. Didn't see the ending, only that the number was covered on that one so I was trying to piece together exactly what happened through this thread.
But it is clear now, if he doesn't stick to his word about complaining, he'll be the all-time ultimate hypocrite.
Scal, he has had a TON of incredible miracle wins over the past couple months that have been ridiculously luckier than that Bucks loss. The packer one tonight was obvious, but it's one of about 5 absolute miracles.
I'll have to trust you on that one. It's hard to top Bucks Heat game although I saw you taking about Va Tech cover in Beamer's last game at home as being worse. Didn't see the ending, only that the number was covered on that one so I was trying to piece together exactly what happened through this thread.
But it is clear now, if he doesn't stick to his word about complaining, he'll be the all-time ultimate hypocrite.
Even if CG said he is good at NCAAF because he uses the color of the jersey to determine the winner - and had repeated this theory over and over - it would have to be taken seriously.
But he has proven (at least to my observations) that he has ZERO METHOD. It is random. The amount of picks per day are based on emotion and circumstances. The stakes are random and based on circumstances. If we are to believe his writeups for reasoning they are beyond juvenile (revenge, I believe...., I think they will be fired up...., stupid nicknames etc). He has never - to my knowledge - given a single writeup that added anything to a pick for any reader with an above average understanding of the sport or gambling.
So any intelligent outsider would write up these successful years of NCCAF as variance, luck, or maybe they dont truly exist (maybe they are exaggerated as folklore or that they were enhanced with other methods).
Imagine this was a legitimate business and CG was looking for investors. Can you imagine his pitch? Anyone with a brain would be insulted.
Thats why I ask you - if he doesnt know why he wins (and clearly he doesnt) - and you dont know why he wins - why would anyone actually listen to anything he says?
Van I doubt Nick even knows what an injury report is. And if he did I doubt he would know if it was a key player or bench warmer.
Even if CG said he is good at NCAAF because he uses the color of the jersey to determine the winner - and had repeated this theory over and over - it would have to be taken seriously.
But he has proven (at least to my observations) that he has ZERO METHOD. It is random. The amount of picks per day are based on emotion and circumstances. The stakes are random and based on circumstances. If we are to believe his writeups for reasoning they are beyond juvenile (revenge, I believe...., I think they will be fired up...., stupid nicknames etc). He has never - to my knowledge - given a single writeup that added anything to a pick for any reader with an above average understanding of the sport or gambling.
So any intelligent outsider would write up these successful years of NCCAF as variance, luck, or maybe they dont truly exist (maybe they are exaggerated as folklore or that they were enhanced with other methods).
Imagine this was a legitimate business and CG was looking for investors. Can you imagine his pitch? Anyone with a brain would be insulted.
Thats why I ask you - if he doesnt know why he wins (and clearly he doesnt) - and you dont know why he wins - why would anyone actually listen to anything he says?
Van I doubt Nick even knows what an injury report is. And if he did I doubt he would know if it was a key player or bench warmer.
Oddly enough, a guy who is bleeding cash doesn't make one peep about the tax hit that he took in cashing this "401K" of his. He would have at least 10K in penalties. I stand by my belief that this was some sort of trust fund that didn't entail a huge tax hit when cashing out.
Additionally, I don't know too many 27 year old gambling addicts who would have that much socked away. I distinctly remember this guy coming on to Covers about three or four years ago claiming that he was down on his luck and afraid that he was going to have to tell his parents that he was out of money. He hit a big parlay with the last of his funds, and then got hot. That is how he built his name on Covers. So the likelihood of the guy not touching a 401K at that point of desperation would have been incredibly slim.
You mean to tell me that a guy who says "I'd bet on two mice in a race" ... and goes from Sharp-to-Square as easy as he takes steps around the casino ... oh, and elects un-employment over a job paying much better than minimum wage (which would still be respectable for someone who know's better) .... You mean a guy like THIS isn't capable of some $70,000+ in SAVINGS?!?!
Bull-friggin-garbage Bro...Bullshit. Hey, it's not YOUR fault you didn't ask him a million times where the money was coming from when he OBVIOUSLY busted-out on the first "$30k". And it's not MY fault he waited till he's like $20k into that 401k to finally fess-up to ONLY losing the initial 30k...LMAO.
Oddly enough, a guy who is bleeding cash doesn't make one peep about the tax hit that he took in cashing this "401K" of his. He would have at least 10K in penalties. I stand by my belief that this was some sort of trust fund that didn't entail a huge tax hit when cashing out.
Additionally, I don't know too many 27 year old gambling addicts who would have that much socked away. I distinctly remember this guy coming on to Covers about three or four years ago claiming that he was down on his luck and afraid that he was going to have to tell his parents that he was out of money. He hit a big parlay with the last of his funds, and then got hot. That is how he built his name on Covers. So the likelihood of the guy not touching a 401K at that point of desperation would have been incredibly slim.
You mean to tell me that a guy who says "I'd bet on two mice in a race" ... and goes from Sharp-to-Square as easy as he takes steps around the casino ... oh, and elects un-employment over a job paying much better than minimum wage (which would still be respectable for someone who know's better) .... You mean a guy like THIS isn't capable of some $70,000+ in SAVINGS?!?!
Bull-friggin-garbage Bro...Bullshit. Hey, it's not YOUR fault you didn't ask him a million times where the money was coming from when he OBVIOUSLY busted-out on the first "$30k". And it's not MY fault he waited till he's like $20k into that 401k to finally fess-up to ONLY losing the initial 30k...LMAO.
uuuuummmmmm,im giving the over/under on this promise being broken 3 days MAXIMUM!!!!!!.....thats if he makes wagers within that period(as if theres any way he wont)
That 3 day Over/Under is spot on... Remember the time when he was gonna quit betting the NFL after the Thanksgiving games then he had a $1K 3 team parlay on Sunday and bet on probably the worst Monday Night matchup in a decade?
uuuuummmmmm,im giving the over/under on this promise being broken 3 days MAXIMUM!!!!!!.....thats if he makes wagers within that period(as if theres any way he wont)
That 3 day Over/Under is spot on... Remember the time when he was gonna quit betting the NFL after the Thanksgiving games then he had a $1K 3 team parlay on Sunday and bet on probably the worst Monday Night matchup in a decade?
That 3 day Over/Under is spot on... Remember the time when he was gonna quit betting the NFL after the Thanksgiving games then he had a $1K 3 team parlay on Sunday and bet on probably the worst Monday Night matchup in a decade?
Oh yeah, that was 5 days ago
hmmm,let me see........
no,no i dont believe i do.......much like college gambler and homer j. simpson i remember nothing and i learn nothing....
That 3 day Over/Under is spot on... Remember the time when he was gonna quit betting the NFL after the Thanksgiving games then he had a $1K 3 team parlay on Sunday and bet on probably the worst Monday Night matchup in a decade?
Oh yeah, that was 5 days ago
hmmm,let me see........
no,no i dont believe i do.......much like college gambler and homer j. simpson i remember nothing and i learn nothing....
I'll have to trust you on that one. It's hard to top Bucks Heat game although I saw you taking about Va Tech cover in Beamer's last game at home as being worse. Didn't see the ending, only that the number was covered on that one so I was trying to piece together exactly what happened through this thread.
But it is clear now, if he doesn't stick to his word about complaining, he'll be the all-time ultimate hypocrite.
or, you could use the INTERNET and take 30 seconds and figure it out. I mean seriously Scal, get with it or GO THE F AWAY.
I'll have to trust you on that one. It's hard to top Bucks Heat game although I saw you taking about Va Tech cover in Beamer's last game at home as being worse. Didn't see the ending, only that the number was covered on that one so I was trying to piece together exactly what happened through this thread.
But it is clear now, if he doesn't stick to his word about complaining, he'll be the all-time ultimate hypocrite.
or, you could use the INTERNET and take 30 seconds and figure it out. I mean seriously Scal, get with it or GO THE F AWAY.
or, you could use the INTERNET and take 30 seconds and figure it out. I mean seriously Scal, get with it or GO THE F AWAY.
Me go away...
Yeah, I wonder how many people on this site would care if I went away or you went away.
For the record, the general postgame wrap-ups on the web will not specifically detail how brutal a COVER is vs. an significant ending of a game resulting in a win or a loss. We are not talking about the Green Bay Detroit ending here. We are talking about a meaningless score in garbage time that only matters to GAMBLERS resulting in a cover, one that virtually all websites could give a shi* about and will not report on in detail.
So what was that about 30 seconds again??? Beat it kid.
or, you could use the INTERNET and take 30 seconds and figure it out. I mean seriously Scal, get with it or GO THE F AWAY.
Me go away...
Yeah, I wonder how many people on this site would care if I went away or you went away.
For the record, the general postgame wrap-ups on the web will not specifically detail how brutal a COVER is vs. an significant ending of a game resulting in a win or a loss. We are not talking about the Green Bay Detroit ending here. We are talking about a meaningless score in garbage time that only matters to GAMBLERS resulting in a cover, one that virtually all websites could give a shi* about and will not report on in detail.
So what was that about 30 seconds again??? Beat it kid.
"A miracle for the ages. Will never ever complain again. Amazing. Watching with my boys from New York too at the book visiting. We all had the pack went insane"
"A miracle for the ages. Will never ever complain again. Amazing. Watching with my boys from New York too at the book visiting. We all had the pack went insane"
Surely he can't get backdoored twice in one night? NC threatening to cover.
And NC has the ball on the 50 with 3 timeouts after an onside kick recovery. ready to get within 5, and the ref calls an absolute phantom offsides penalty on UNC to effectively end the game and seal the cover for CG. The call was so bad, even the announcers were chastising refs for it.
You're right Rangerz, this guy has the magic touch!!!
Surely he can't get backdoored twice in one night? NC threatening to cover.
And NC has the ball on the 50 with 3 timeouts after an onside kick recovery. ready to get within 5, and the ref calls an absolute phantom offsides penalty on UNC to effectively end the game and seal the cover for CG. The call was so bad, even the announcers were chastising refs for it.
You're right Rangerz, this guy has the magic touch!!!
Surely he can't get backdoored twice in one night? NC threatening to cover.
And NC has the ball on the 50 with 3 timeouts after an onside kick recovery. ready to get within 5, and the ref calls an absolute phantom offsides penalty on UNC to effectively end the game and seal the cover for CG. The call was so bad, even the announcers were chastising refs for it.
You're right Rangerz, this guy has the magic touch!!!
Surely he can't get backdoored twice in one night? NC threatening to cover.
And NC has the ball on the 50 with 3 timeouts after an onside kick recovery. ready to get within 5, and the ref calls an absolute phantom offsides penalty on UNC to effectively end the game and seal the cover for CG. The call was so bad, even the announcers were chastising refs for it.
You're right Rangerz, this guy has the magic touch!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.