Maybe---but you DO NOT hear about the vast amount of non suspected things---only the trumped up ones the media promotes. The world benefited that there weren't weapons---even though we all suspected there were---or that they were hidden, etc.
But that could be another big trumped up news story---Sadaam has weapons---Sadaam has weapons---good for news.
Sort of like ---politicians do corp bidding---politicians do corp bidding---makes for good news. Who cares if it is true or not--just get a lot of people to think so. Got a hot story then.
Maybe---but you DO NOT hear about the vast amount of non suspected things---only the trumped up ones the media promotes. The world benefited that there weren't weapons---even though we all suspected there were---or that they were hidden, etc.
But that could be another big trumped up news story---Sadaam has weapons---Sadaam has weapons---good for news.
Sort of like ---politicians do corp bidding---politicians do corp bidding---makes for good news. Who cares if it is true or not--just get a lot of people to think so. Got a hot story then.
Whoa Not the Lewinsky conspiracy.
So, the banks supported both sides? So someone that has your argument cannot lose then? No matter who got elected was gonna have pressure from the average folks to do something, thus, leading into the conspiracies of doing corps bidding.
Whoa Not the Lewinsky conspiracy.
So, the banks supported both sides? So someone that has your argument cannot lose then? No matter who got elected was gonna have pressure from the average folks to do something, thus, leading into the conspiracies of doing corps bidding.
If there is a 'pattern' there should be some ---like the Perry allegations. The Bush ones....but got to prove this is reason. Cannot just accuse and pick and choose---when candidates have lots of backers on either side of multiple issues.
Good conversation---later---
If there is a 'pattern' there should be some ---like the Perry allegations. The Bush ones....but got to prove this is reason. Cannot just accuse and pick and choose---when candidates have lots of backers on either side of multiple issues.
Good conversation---later---
Didn't know anyone was defending a party or candidate?
At this point they are all doing it or none are doing it---catch up quick--we'll be moving along shortly
Didn't know anyone was defending a party or candidate?
At this point they are all doing it or none are doing it---catch up quick--we'll be moving along shortly
I would use something like NRA or gaay rights. Where, clearly one candidate got the backing. Then show me how the candidate got benefit or felt obligated to change sides because of their backing, or afraid to lose their backing, etc.
Know what I mean? Just because we suspect there are raccons in the basement and your neighbors have caught a couple in theirs---doesn't mean you have them---yet. Not best analogy---but you get point.
Doing mulitple things ---so wording is jumbled.
I would use something like NRA or gaay rights. Where, clearly one candidate got the backing. Then show me how the candidate got benefit or felt obligated to change sides because of their backing, or afraid to lose their backing, etc.
Know what I mean? Just because we suspect there are raccons in the basement and your neighbors have caught a couple in theirs---doesn't mean you have them---yet. Not best analogy---but you get point.
Doing mulitple things ---so wording is jumbled.
All that I agree with. Because I do feel it is about power, even more than money.
I think they should be---especially if they have some sort of quorum(is that right word for it?) or whatever you wanna call it. But they usually don't have a quorum. Otherwise, all sorts of fringe guys be demanding a podium.
I hate the two-party system---because as much as I say there is no hard evidence---I agree there sure is an awful lot of smoke.
Should be at least 3-4 parties.
That is a credit to Dems though---Reps try to have splinter parties--splits their vote and they lose. Dems stick together---cannot recall last dem fringe?
All that I agree with. Because I do feel it is about power, even more than money.
I think they should be---especially if they have some sort of quorum(is that right word for it?) or whatever you wanna call it. But they usually don't have a quorum. Otherwise, all sorts of fringe guys be demanding a podium.
I hate the two-party system---because as much as I say there is no hard evidence---I agree there sure is an awful lot of smoke.
Should be at least 3-4 parties.
That is a credit to Dems though---Reps try to have splinter parties--splits their vote and they lose. Dems stick together---cannot recall last dem fringe?
Maybe---but you DO NOT hear about the vast amount of non suspected things---only the trumped up ones the media promotes. The world benefited that there weren't weapons---even though we all suspected there were---or that they were hidden, etc.
But that could be another big trumped up news story---Sadaam has weapons---Sadaam has weapons---good for news.
Sort of like ---politicians do corp bidding---politicians do corp bidding---makes for good news. Who cares if it is true or not--just get a lot of people to think so. Got a hot story then.
Maybe---but you DO NOT hear about the vast amount of non suspected things---only the trumped up ones the media promotes. The world benefited that there weren't weapons---even though we all suspected there were---or that they were hidden, etc.
But that could be another big trumped up news story---Sadaam has weapons---Sadaam has weapons---good for news.
Sort of like ---politicians do corp bidding---politicians do corp bidding---makes for good news. Who cares if it is true or not--just get a lot of people to think so. Got a hot story then.
All that I agree with. Because I do feel it is about power, even more than money.
I think they should be---especially if they have some sort of quorum(is that right word for it?) or whatever you wanna call it. But they usually don't have a quorum. Otherwise, all sorts of fringe guys be demanding a podium.
I hate the two-party system---because as much as I say there is no hard evidence---I agree there sure is an awful lot of smoke.
Should be at least 3-4 parties.
That is a credit to Dems though---Reps try to have splinter parties--splits their vote and they lose. Dems stick together---cannot recall last dem fringe?
All that I agree with. Because I do feel it is about power, even more than money.
I think they should be---especially if they have some sort of quorum(is that right word for it?) or whatever you wanna call it. But they usually don't have a quorum. Otherwise, all sorts of fringe guys be demanding a podium.
I hate the two-party system---because as much as I say there is no hard evidence---I agree there sure is an awful lot of smoke.
Should be at least 3-4 parties.
That is a credit to Dems though---Reps try to have splinter parties--splits their vote and they lose. Dems stick together---cannot recall last dem fringe?
You are correct. If Rep in office and supports a ban of some sort--we need to check his bank acct quick! Haha!
I do some research later---I know allegations like Perry---and Purdue in GA making money while in office popped up. May be something to them, can't recall exact corps thouhg.
Funny how Republicans downplay these, while making fun of Biden because he is not a miilionaire after being in office so long.
You are correct. If Rep in office and supports a ban of some sort--we need to check his bank acct quick! Haha!
I do some research later---I know allegations like Perry---and Purdue in GA making money while in office popped up. May be something to them, can't recall exact corps thouhg.
Funny how Republicans downplay these, while making fun of Biden because he is not a miilionaire after being in office so long.
I agree they can be swayed or minds changed--I just am not sure they are just doing corp bidding because of backing strictly is all. Like I said---heap a smoke--no flames yet.
Of course I would believe a good specific example--Rep or Dem
I look for some later---gotta look into some games now---
I agree they can be swayed or minds changed--I just am not sure they are just doing corp bidding because of backing strictly is all. Like I said---heap a smoke--no flames yet.
Of course I would believe a good specific example--Rep or Dem
I look for some later---gotta look into some games now---
The only thing I would argue is those guys probably lost most of it before they even close to that point. Most of them started their "training" in city, county and state levels.
The only thing I would argue is those guys probably lost most of it before they even close to that point. Most of them started their "training" in city, county and state levels.
The only thing I would argue is those guys probably lost most of it before they even close to that point. Most of them started their "training" in city, county and state levels.
The only thing I would argue is those guys probably lost most of it before they even close to that point. Most of them started their "training" in city, county and state levels.
The only thing I would argue is those guys probably lost most of it before they even close to that point. Most of them started their "training" in city, county and state levels.
The only thing I would argue is those guys probably lost most of it before they even close to that point. Most of them started their "training" in city, county and state levels.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.