Can anyone explain to me why Liberals show mercy for an inmate on death row but no mercy for an unborn fetus?
that's too general of a question, but i think some people don't believe in killing actual people particularly when the death sentence comes as part of a flawed legal system where it is proven that many people have been wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death, i.e. are innocent. as for the abortion part, i don't know anyone who has no sympathy for the fetus, so i can't speak for all those people foxnews talks about who just get off on killing fetuses, but for the pro choice people i know, it's more of a balancing test where a woman's right to choose what happens within her body and the desire to avoid big government worshiping republicans controlling their body when we all know they don't give two shits about the kid once it is born wins the balancing test over the death of the fetus. a tough choice for them, but a choice nonetheless.
Can anyone explain to me why Liberals show mercy for an inmate on death row but no mercy for an unborn fetus?
that's too general of a question, but i think some people don't believe in killing actual people particularly when the death sentence comes as part of a flawed legal system where it is proven that many people have been wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death, i.e. are innocent. as for the abortion part, i don't know anyone who has no sympathy for the fetus, so i can't speak for all those people foxnews talks about who just get off on killing fetuses, but for the pro choice people i know, it's more of a balancing test where a woman's right to choose what happens within her body and the desire to avoid big government worshiping republicans controlling their body when we all know they don't give two shits about the kid once it is born wins the balancing test over the death of the fetus. a tough choice for them, but a choice nonetheless.
I can see where you are coming from on that. I'm not a big fan of legislating morality or at least what they view as moral vs immoral. I have the same issues with the left on pushing their social equality garbage. We should help those that truly cannot provide for themselves (mentally/physically handicapped, orphans, etc), but we need to reign in the government handouts from those just gaming the system. No able bodied adult should receive anything for free. Unemployment and welfare should be tied to some type of community service work. I think that would not only help the local communities but also provide an incentive for that person to get off welfare. At the very least the tax payers are actually getting something positive back from the welfare spending.
I agree with you in many things. Like I said, it is the Evangelical conservatives which need extermination..not the moderate republicans.
I agree that it is unfair for the working man to pay the bills of all the dead beat dads in this country. But the Kids still need to have their needs met because they should not be held responsible for the actions of their irresponsible dads. So i came up with a solution for this one problem.. INCARCERATE them and make them do PAID community service, but the pay does not go to the dead beat dads, it goes to the children via food stamps, clothing stamps, school supply stamps. You can enforce this by denying help to any woman who refuses to report the dead beat dad of her kids. Because many of these women are not reporting these men out of fear, and no reason to report them if they are getting the benefits without needing to report them.
But there are many circumstances of people being poor and in serious need that did not result from irresponsibility on their part.
I can see where you are coming from on that. I'm not a big fan of legislating morality or at least what they view as moral vs immoral. I have the same issues with the left on pushing their social equality garbage. We should help those that truly cannot provide for themselves (mentally/physically handicapped, orphans, etc), but we need to reign in the government handouts from those just gaming the system. No able bodied adult should receive anything for free. Unemployment and welfare should be tied to some type of community service work. I think that would not only help the local communities but also provide an incentive for that person to get off welfare. At the very least the tax payers are actually getting something positive back from the welfare spending.
I agree with you in many things. Like I said, it is the Evangelical conservatives which need extermination..not the moderate republicans.
I agree that it is unfair for the working man to pay the bills of all the dead beat dads in this country. But the Kids still need to have their needs met because they should not be held responsible for the actions of their irresponsible dads. So i came up with a solution for this one problem.. INCARCERATE them and make them do PAID community service, but the pay does not go to the dead beat dads, it goes to the children via food stamps, clothing stamps, school supply stamps. You can enforce this by denying help to any woman who refuses to report the dead beat dad of her kids. Because many of these women are not reporting these men out of fear, and no reason to report them if they are getting the benefits without needing to report them.
But there are many circumstances of people being poor and in serious need that did not result from irresponsibility on their part.
And also add the "corporate welfare" and other pork-barrel projects into the equation as well. What's truly disheartening is the fact that a lot of people seem ONLY be able to argue on one side.
I have been accused of voting for both the Democrat and the Republican candidates in the SAME election when I did neither. I figured I must have done something right.
Corporate welfare included as being cut also, for sure. I'd cut the military spending as well. No reason for us to have bases in over 130 countries around the world.
It's been a while since I voted for a Dem but I did vote for Clinton for a 2nd term. He was doing a good job and the country was doing great.
And also add the "corporate welfare" and other pork-barrel projects into the equation as well. What's truly disheartening is the fact that a lot of people seem ONLY be able to argue on one side.
I have been accused of voting for both the Democrat and the Republican candidates in the SAME election when I did neither. I figured I must have done something right.
Corporate welfare included as being cut also, for sure. I'd cut the military spending as well. No reason for us to have bases in over 130 countries around the world.
It's been a while since I voted for a Dem but I did vote for Clinton for a 2nd term. He was doing a good job and the country was doing great.
Have to disagree with this. I'd be willing to bet that there are Republicans that are fiscally conservative but not part of the religious right. Then again the more that I think about this, any Republican that has voted for any of the bloated budgets I wouldn't consider a fiscal conservative, so on second thought you may be right. There might not be any fiscal conservative Republicans left.
Have to disagree with this. I'd be willing to bet that there are Republicans that are fiscally conservative but not part of the religious right. Then again the more that I think about this, any Republican that has voted for any of the bloated budgets I wouldn't consider a fiscal conservative, so on second thought you may be right. There might not be any fiscal conservative Republicans left.
Can anyone explain to me why Liberals show mercy for an inmate on death row but no mercy for an unborn fetus?
Ok, lets try this again....being PRO CHOICE does not make one PRO Abortion. One can be PRO LIFE--meaning anti death penalty and anti abortion while being for PRO CHOICE. PRO CHOICE means i have no right trying to take away something that God gave someone..FREE WILL even if it means their choice going against what I believe is moral.
Can anyone explain to me why Liberals show mercy for an inmate on death row but no mercy for an unborn fetus?
Ok, lets try this again....being PRO CHOICE does not make one PRO Abortion. One can be PRO LIFE--meaning anti death penalty and anti abortion while being for PRO CHOICE. PRO CHOICE means i have no right trying to take away something that God gave someone..FREE WILL even if it means their choice going against what I believe is moral.
Corporate welfare included as being cut also, for sure. I'd cut the military spending as well. No reason for us to have bases in over 130 countries around the world.
It's been a while since I voted for a Dem but I did vote for Clinton for a 2nd term. He was doing a good job and the country was doing great.
I am not an registered Republican but I never voted for a Dem in a general election. I still got called an "RINO", "liberal" just because I DARE to criticize the Party or people like Ted Cruz. The extreme segment is destroying the Party.
Corporate welfare included as being cut also, for sure. I'd cut the military spending as well. No reason for us to have bases in over 130 countries around the world.
It's been a while since I voted for a Dem but I did vote for Clinton for a 2nd term. He was doing a good job and the country was doing great.
I am not an registered Republican but I never voted for a Dem in a general election. I still got called an "RINO", "liberal" just because I DARE to criticize the Party or people like Ted Cruz. The extreme segment is destroying the Party.
I am not an registered Republican but I never voted for a Dem in a general election. I still got called an "RINO", "liberal" just because I DARE to criticize the Party or people like Ted Cruz. The extreme segment is destroying the Party.
[/Quote
I agree Bunny....i dont vote any party to tell you the truth. People think I am a Liberal because i speak out against the evangelicals in the republican party. They don't understand that there is nothing wrong with Moderate republicans, it is them who are the problem.
They simply can't understand that both the Bible and Constitution they claim to defend both support separation between State and Church.
I am not an registered Republican but I never voted for a Dem in a general election. I still got called an "RINO", "liberal" just because I DARE to criticize the Party or people like Ted Cruz. The extreme segment is destroying the Party.
[/Quote
I agree Bunny....i dont vote any party to tell you the truth. People think I am a Liberal because i speak out against the evangelicals in the republican party. They don't understand that there is nothing wrong with Moderate republicans, it is them who are the problem.
They simply can't understand that both the Bible and Constitution they claim to defend both support separation between State and Church.
Ok, lets try this again....being PRO CHOICE does not make one PRO Abortion. One can be PRO LIFE--meaning anti death penalty and anti abortion while being for PRO CHOICE. PRO CHOICE means i have no right trying to take away something that God gave someone..FREE WILL even if it means their choice going against what I believe is moral.
I believe PRO CHOICE takes place before conception in MOST cases.
Excluding rape cases....women and their partners make the choice to be responsible or not before the snake hits the beaver.
Ok, lets try this again....being PRO CHOICE does not make one PRO Abortion. One can be PRO LIFE--meaning anti death penalty and anti abortion while being for PRO CHOICE. PRO CHOICE means i have no right trying to take away something that God gave someone..FREE WILL even if it means their choice going against what I believe is moral.
I believe PRO CHOICE takes place before conception in MOST cases.
Excluding rape cases....women and their partners make the choice to be responsible or not before the snake hits the beaver.
I believe PRO CHOICE takes place before conception in MOST cases.
Excluding rape cases....women and their partners make the choice to be responsible or not before the snake hits the beaver.
Agreed. and they still have another choice they can make after that.. and another after that, and another after that. Life is full of choices!
Imo, Abortion is murder. But in the opinion of others it is not. I can't try persuading them while i am wearing sandwich boards outside Washington that shout REPENT OR BURN...the only chance to limit abortions in this country is through education.
I believe PRO CHOICE takes place before conception in MOST cases.
Excluding rape cases....women and their partners make the choice to be responsible or not before the snake hits the beaver.
Agreed. and they still have another choice they can make after that.. and another after that, and another after that. Life is full of choices!
Imo, Abortion is murder. But in the opinion of others it is not. I can't try persuading them while i am wearing sandwich boards outside Washington that shout REPENT OR BURN...the only chance to limit abortions in this country is through education.
Why is it that the only ones who constantly talk about folks like Hannity and Rush are staunch liberals? I don't know many ppl who watch either show but I am starting to think that his viewership may have a majority of liberals
Why is it that the only ones who constantly talk about folks like Hannity and Rush are staunch liberals? I don't know many ppl who watch either show but I am starting to think that his viewership may have a majority of liberals
I cruise by Hannity once in a while, but I can't stand to look at him long. I do listen to Rush in me car once in a while, and I laugh at him and the middle class chumps that believe that propaganda and call in.
I cruise by Hannity once in a while, but I can't stand to look at him long. I do listen to Rush in me car once in a while, and I laugh at him and the middle class chumps that believe that propaganda and call in.
1, They claim they are the Ambassadors of Christ in this world. Christ was all for helping the poor, elderly, sick. They people vote against anything and everything that helps the poor, elderly and sick.
2. They claim they are PRO -LIFE but they are found being pro DEATH penalty. Funny, they claim they are Ambassadors of Christ and yet despite Christ pardoning the criminals, these folk want the criminals fried on an electric chair.
3. They tell the entire world that God is sovereign but also He gave man free will. That in itself is moronic, I mean really, think about it. A dad with little kids is going to make the final decision on all decisions. The 4 yr old can want to go to Disney but unless their dad takes them they aint going. ..but what makes them hypocrites is this.. If God gave man free will, why are "God's Ambassadors" fighting to take away from man what God gave man? What makes them think they are wiser then God? So in other words, God gave women the right to choose between good and evil(that is what free will is) but these oxymoron hypocrites want to take away that choice from women, the choice they tell women God gave them but they as his ambassadors are trying to take away..hahahaha
4. They hit everyone over the head with New Testament Scriptures, and yet are found pushing laws that go entirely against New Testament Scriptures..such as Gun Laws. New Testament says that our Armor is Spiritual..it does say it is a semi-automatic weapon. In fact, Jesus Himself never tried defending himself with a physical sword. He rebuked his disciple for using the sword against his enemy. Yet these people who call themselves ambassadors of God are found protesting for their right to guns to defend themselves.
5. They seem to always enjoy preaching on LOVE but these people hate everyone...Gays, Muslims, Athiest, Hindus,blacks,..essentially, to these people, if you do not believe whatever doctrine they believe, and if you do not look like them, dress like them and act like them..you are going to HELL and you are going to be subject to their wrath, because well ya know..they are the so called Ambassadors of God.
They know how to call everyone an Anti-Christ, but truth be told, the evangelical right wing in America are the true Anti-Christ's in the world..the wolves in sheep clothing that Christ Himself warned against..those people who love taking on a form of godliness but deny the power of the Spirit!
What a confusing thread topic, since all the recent bashing in politics has been over where to spend the country's next dime (i.e. fiscal matters)
1, They claim they are the Ambassadors of Christ in this world. Christ was all for helping the poor, elderly, sick. They people vote against anything and everything that helps the poor, elderly and sick.
2. They claim they are PRO -LIFE but they are found being pro DEATH penalty. Funny, they claim they are Ambassadors of Christ and yet despite Christ pardoning the criminals, these folk want the criminals fried on an electric chair.
3. They tell the entire world that God is sovereign but also He gave man free will. That in itself is moronic, I mean really, think about it. A dad with little kids is going to make the final decision on all decisions. The 4 yr old can want to go to Disney but unless their dad takes them they aint going. ..but what makes them hypocrites is this.. If God gave man free will, why are "God's Ambassadors" fighting to take away from man what God gave man? What makes them think they are wiser then God? So in other words, God gave women the right to choose between good and evil(that is what free will is) but these oxymoron hypocrites want to take away that choice from women, the choice they tell women God gave them but they as his ambassadors are trying to take away..hahahaha
4. They hit everyone over the head with New Testament Scriptures, and yet are found pushing laws that go entirely against New Testament Scriptures..such as Gun Laws. New Testament says that our Armor is Spiritual..it does say it is a semi-automatic weapon. In fact, Jesus Himself never tried defending himself with a physical sword. He rebuked his disciple for using the sword against his enemy. Yet these people who call themselves ambassadors of God are found protesting for their right to guns to defend themselves.
5. They seem to always enjoy preaching on LOVE but these people hate everyone...Gays, Muslims, Athiest, Hindus,blacks,..essentially, to these people, if you do not believe whatever doctrine they believe, and if you do not look like them, dress like them and act like them..you are going to HELL and you are going to be subject to their wrath, because well ya know..they are the so called Ambassadors of God.
They know how to call everyone an Anti-Christ, but truth be told, the evangelical right wing in America are the true Anti-Christ's in the world..the wolves in sheep clothing that Christ Himself warned against..those people who love taking on a form of godliness but deny the power of the Spirit!
What a confusing thread topic, since all the recent bashing in politics has been over where to spend the country's next dime (i.e. fiscal matters)
Have to disagree with this. I'd be willing to bet that there are Republicans that are fiscally conservative but not part of the religious right. Then again the more that I think about this, any Republican that has voted for any of the bloated budgets I wouldn't consider a fiscal conservative, so on second thought you may be right. There might not be any fiscal conservative Republicans left.
Have to disagree with this. I'd be willing to bet that there are Republicans that are fiscally conservative but not part of the religious right. Then again the more that I think about this, any Republican that has voted for any of the bloated budgets I wouldn't consider a fiscal conservative, so on second thought you may be right. There might not be any fiscal conservative Republicans left.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.