pretty obvious you bet the B's -1 1/2 -105 against the "Flat Cats". also think the Devils @ Rags OVER 5 even a bet along with Canes @ Bugs OVER 6 even, BJ's @ Sharks OVER 5 -105 and and Ducks @ Oil OVER 5 -125.
sides more ticky. leaning for the Flames +180 to continue as the "Calgary Cockroaches" @ Minnesota and the Ducks -115 to go from "Das Braten Enten" back to "Der Kampfe Enten" @ Edmonton. will probably chance the Ducks -1 1/2 +250 also. somewhat suprised the Devils are a +160 in a rivalry game esp with both Kovalchuk and Volchenkov back in their lineup and "Der Sternen" (Stars) +170 @ Kings who they have beaten 3 of 4 this season including 2 @ LA.
off to South Point to book that early B's -1 1/2 $210 to return $410 AND the 4 OVERS in a parlay. $30 returns $421. like with the Saturday parlays, "Hey!!! Ya Never KNOW!!!
pretty obvious you bet the B's -1 1/2 -105 against the "Flat Cats". also think the Devils @ Rags OVER 5 even a bet along with Canes @ Bugs OVER 6 even, BJ's @ Sharks OVER 5 -105 and and Ducks @ Oil OVER 5 -125.
sides more ticky. leaning for the Flames +180 to continue as the "Calgary Cockroaches" @ Minnesota and the Ducks -115 to go from "Das Braten Enten" back to "Der Kampfe Enten" @ Edmonton. will probably chance the Ducks -1 1/2 +250 also. somewhat suprised the Devils are a +160 in a rivalry game esp with both Kovalchuk and Volchenkov back in their lineup and "Der Sternen" (Stars) +170 @ Kings who they have beaten 3 of 4 this season including 2 @ LA.
off to South Point to book that early B's -1 1/2 $210 to return $410 AND the 4 OVERS in a parlay. $30 returns $421. like with the Saturday parlays, "Hey!!! Ya Never KNOW!!!
The Bruins are playing absolutely horrendous as of late. They're not the same team they were at the beginning of this year at all. You'd think they'd be able to handle Florida, but they've lost 4 straight, including a loss to Carolina. Having watched all these games (and unfortunately lost money on them from being a homer), I'd say look elsewhere!
The Bruins are playing absolutely horrendous as of late. They're not the same team they were at the beginning of this year at all. You'd think they'd be able to handle Florida, but they've lost 4 straight, including a loss to Carolina. Having watched all these games (and unfortunately lost money on them from being a homer), I'd say look elsewhere!
Blues games are just TOO "low scoring tight" for my taste, Db. can't bet puckline with them AND -160 seems a bit "pricey" on road against an Ava's team that, like Calgary, have been "Darrell Royal Cockroaches" lately.
Bruins bet as much AGAINST the "Flat Cats" as ON the B's tomarrow. I think they "fill the net" on who ever Florida has in goal. Cats will get probably get one or two themselves SO changed my totals OVER parlay to Cats @ B's 5 1/2+120, Devils @ Rags 5 even, Canes @ Bugs 6 even and Ducks @ Oil 5 -125 and dropped the BJ's @ Sharks because BJ games are seriel unders. $30 returns $475. Cat @ B's does makes a mess, I can come back with other three later.
after Bruins -1 1/2 -105 for $210, also played Flames +180, Ducks -1 1/2 +250 and Stars +170 all for a buck each. will see what happens. I think BOTH the B's AND Ducks are ready to "scorch" someone.
Blues games are just TOO "low scoring tight" for my taste, Db. can't bet puckline with them AND -160 seems a bit "pricey" on road against an Ava's team that, like Calgary, have been "Darrell Royal Cockroaches" lately.
Bruins bet as much AGAINST the "Flat Cats" as ON the B's tomarrow. I think they "fill the net" on who ever Florida has in goal. Cats will get probably get one or two themselves SO changed my totals OVER parlay to Cats @ B's 5 1/2+120, Devils @ Rags 5 even, Canes @ Bugs 6 even and Ducks @ Oil 5 -125 and dropped the BJ's @ Sharks because BJ games are seriel unders. $30 returns $475. Cat @ B's does makes a mess, I can come back with other three later.
after Bruins -1 1/2 -105 for $210, also played Flames +180, Ducks -1 1/2 +250 and Stars +170 all for a buck each. will see what happens. I think BOTH the B's AND Ducks are ready to "scorch" someone.
Blues games are low scoring and tight and -165 is a lot to lay. But their focus is on defense and they are possessed right now. Backes has this team believing right now. Im obviously from stl but Im laying the juice tomorrow because this team is believing... When Elliot is in net. If not pass on that stuff. I like Allen but Elliot is a man on a mission. I think the avs have flamed out and the blues win and cover the pl tomorrow if Allen is in net 2-0, 3-1... But i am biased
Blues games are low scoring and tight and -165 is a lot to lay. But their focus is on defense and they are possessed right now. Backes has this team believing right now. Im obviously from stl but Im laying the juice tomorrow because this team is believing... When Elliot is in net. If not pass on that stuff. I like Allen but Elliot is a man on a mission. I think the avs have flamed out and the blues win and cover the pl tomorrow if Allen is in net 2-0, 3-1... But i am biased
BTW, the Blues have a hell of a time playing in Colorado. That was the last thing that pushed me on the Avs.
BOL
saw that in you thread, Lipps. not comfy with the game BUT low scoring Blues games can go either way. hope the "Colorado Cockroaches" "fall into a spoil" the Blues tonight for you
I had B's TT O 3.5
don't blame you for being P!SSED, HookEm. last four Cats roadies they allowed at LEAST 5 or more GA's. B's HAD 40 SOG's on Markstrom BUT only get 2 by him? (3rd was an "M-T")
BTW, the Blues have a hell of a time playing in Colorado. That was the last thing that pushed me on the Avs.
BOL
saw that in you thread, Lipps. not comfy with the game BUT low scoring Blues games can go either way. hope the "Colorado Cockroaches" "fall into a spoil" the Blues tonight for you
I had B's TT O 3.5
don't blame you for being P!SSED, HookEm. last four Cats roadies they allowed at LEAST 5 or more GA's. B's HAD 40 SOG's on Markstrom BUT only get 2 by him? (3rd was an "M-T")
How are you feeling about TB money line? I kinda like it.
Ya never can tell with the Bugs, lego, and I sure as hell wouldn't lay a -160 on them. just TOO inconsistant. something "fishy" going on when a team with Stamkos, St. Louis, Lecavalier and Teddy Purcell can NOT score goals.
How are you feeling about TB money line? I kinda like it.
Ya never can tell with the Bugs, lego, and I sure as hell wouldn't lay a -160 on them. just TOO inconsistant. something "fishy" going on when a team with Stamkos, St. Louis, Lecavalier and Teddy Purcell can NOT score goals.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.